Category: Economy

  • An ancient Russian Orthodox prophecy accomplished

    An ancient Russian Orthodox prophecy (I remember for sure that such a prophecy exists, but I can’t find it in Internet, please comment with a reference.) says that the world will die as a result of forcibly parting ways of a loving couple of a man and a woman.

    It accomplished this way:

    I was 17, I met a 15 years girl. We started to speak. In scorn I asked her a question to laugh about a stupid answer. But she gave a correct answer. She is a genius!, though I. A few phrases, and I understood that she had essentially the same views as me.

    The girl was also very beautiful and I proposed her marriage. She agreed.

    We spoke about different things.

    Among other things, I started to speak about sex. I offered her sex. But after a second remembered it may produce a child. But she responded she never yet had menstruation and so would not bear a child. We had sex. (The law about child “abuse” did not matter: we didn’t reach legal responsibility age.)

    But our conspiracy was bad. Her father (He was a state official. Hm, maybe they were Maria Putina and Putin? I don’t remember that man’s look at all.) He forcibly parted us.

    So, the world died this way, because I had no dowry to make my financial state sane.

    This repeated several times. Apparently, I was also very happily married (apparently, without state registration) to a K-12 math teacher and to a math professor (both much elder than me, but I considered them young because despite of me being then a teenager, 24 or so years old women are sometimes felt by me as somehow too young) – maybe two math professors (one a white Russian and another black, probably American), but my head was hit so badly that I don’t know the details.

  • The author’s story

    This is the story of the author of great site allworldfiles.net

    I was blamed when I said I am a genius. I was in fear that somebody will ask me if I think about myself as a genius that I will die from hunger because people refuse to speak with me when I boast. I was frightened and afraid to think: If I make a scientific discovery, I will know for sure that I am a genius and then I will die because when being asked whether I think to be a genius I will answer “yes”.

    When the mother sent me for being a Baptist out of house after not feeding me for a few weeks (I was dying of hunger many times also after this) in the first year of my university study, I finished my first discovery, and thought: I have a trillion dollars formula and will now die. I was wrong: I survived. I also was wrong that it’s trillion dollars: Later I realized that my discovery is about as general theory as group theory and is therefore about half of mathematics (~$50 trillions). But it is yet an underestimation: Because as a result of hunger I lost the ability to get a scientific degree, I mis-published (self-published a too long scientific article, 400 pages, that does not conform to length standards of scientific journals) it thus “effectively” blocking further development of science even if somebody rediscovered it.

    I did more discoveries and now I am the record winner: I discovered about 3-4 (dependently on how to count) fundamental branches of mathematics, while AFAIK nobody other did more than one such a discovery. And I apparently discovered the several latest such things, that is by definition these ones that were the most difficult to discover. I did it with no financing, hunger, broken head, hate and fear of being considered a genius and die, and with difficult philosophical and theological problems such as whether I to go to hell after misbehaving because of damaged head. Thus, I am the best mathematician in the known History with a very big handicap.

    My app for advanced study of Tanakh (ancient Hebrew Bible) hasn’t become popular enough. Because I was also beaten and hungry for making this app, I was despaired and in a nervous breakdown prayed for coronavirus (as a punishment for not using my app). That was a nervous breakdown but now nevertheless I think it was a right decision.

    I was mis-diagnosed with schizophrenia instead of post-trauma syndrome and essentially lost all citizen rights.

    I meditated on the Bible and once understood: The purpose of the experiment was for the lab mouse to break out of the cell. I did broke my religion (the Gospel) and now am no more a Christian, Christianity as well as Judaism are true but they are now silly funny jokes. So, I am the winner, that mouse that sit in the cell but exited from it.

    I called to God claiming against people to revenge against them for Hitler-like “We don’t need geniuses.”, for caste system where I had no scientific degree and no voice, for hate and discrimination to me, and for being beaten and hungry, etc.

    God responded to me like:

    • He makes people my slaves and I get the spiritual “money” you earn from God for your disability, stupidity and greed.
    • I will shut up my ears for a flight and He takes me in the time machine to the past, the time machine will crush 7000 people in Jerusalem destroying the city, because they offended a time traveler just like as it was in Sodom.
    • I was build a copy (that’s the process of reproduction of the living God) of God (that is however is the same as the original God, because there is only one God) and you pray to my copy of God.
    • Your Messiah will fly to there together with me, we will dine together and set diplomatic relations between our planets.
    • The planet where I to go is populated by Messiahs, and I will become one of them, just like as Elisha became another Eliah.
    • I am a man from the book of Revelation, chapter 11.
    • Moreover, I am the god of the Sea that created himself (using a time machine), about which we can read in Genesis 1:1, if to read without vowels.
    • God told me to cure my post-trauma syndrome by using magic against the people, attacking them whenever I want. That’s a well known kind of psychotherapy, when one reproduces his traumatic situation but this time wins. (That’s by the way a clever strategy: I am a proxy sent by a psychiatrist wanting to harm people without a clear pupose for me to be like insane, thus making for people no protection strategy against me. One of my main purposes now is to train my insanity to be prepared for future (past) wars with aliens.)
    • Apparently, I am was be the archangel Gabriel. When I was come to saint Mary, still having a human form, I am not going to touch her for her being unclean to me, but instead to use a genetic technology.
    • I am a child of Abraham (He was a bad person, by the way: only an insane stupid bastard could give to Melek Zedek 10% instead of planning to give 100% and to die of hunger, while Melek Zedek is of the Most High God not just omnipotent as the part of God’s that Abraham understood.) My civilization will fire stars, so many stars are Abraham’s childrens as promised.
    • Why people in Rev. 11 are afraid? Apparently, because only two people are taken to the heaven. Maybe, the second one is myself from a different quantum world variant? Why only me? Only I use cryptocurrency to fight climate change, all the rest are in the cell where they if do good then only to a neighbor not to distant climate victims.
    • God says me that He will not reject me and give me victory no matter what I do.
    • Messiah said me to stop praying and start to think.
    • Accordingly my understanding, your Messiah is going to throw his body into fire and sulfur in union of throwing you all into fire and sulfur as the revenge what happened with me, at the same time entering into me and leaving this planet in my body. Jesus saw North Korea’s all time good news and realized that his empire of truth is like the North Korea empire of lie, after Jesus looked at the effect (such as destruction of world economy because of me by concealing my scientifc discoveries that already happened) of me heroically trying not to lie that I don’t love Jesus. So, Jesus is going to dispose his failed kingdom on the Earth and goes to his next project in me. Then I interpret the Revelation as that we Nibirean annuaks (aka Elves) will return to the Earth cleansed from people by people yourselves and occupy one more planet. But as a side project I am going to reform the world economy to reduce carbon as much as possible, because I want to ensure that your planet does not become Venus for us annuaks to seize it after you die more easily.

    I also need to say that there is a relation between God and a kind aliens (called gods in most English Torah translations): God, among other cryptomorphisms, is the economical model of these aliens.

    After a conflict about my plan of climate mitigation, I hated you so much that I decided not to save you from eternal fire and sulfur (as of serum-hydrogen and serum-acid that will be in the air as results of climate change, so you will wear “breathers” called “souls of sinners” in ancient literature about the hell).

    But I got and idea of a new, done by myself blockchain for common good money, and thought that your Messiah is still in human body and I am to help him to breathe better, so I to replace your evil financial system with my new blockchain to help. That’s my next software project.

    Now I have this million-pages site after my great idea how to get big profit and you got a very good luck: you just go to fire and sulfur instead of being fully destroyed, because I am going to have enough financing and publicity to start my new blockchain for social good.

    More materials

  • How $50 Trillion Were Stolen

    There were stolen about $50 trillion of value.

    First consider a hypothetical situation: What if we somehow lose group theory? Group theory is kinda half of mathematics. More precisely, it is kinda a foundation of kinda like half of modern mathematics. If you get any modern math research (or a serious textbook), the I estimated the probability of having something from group theory in it as about 75%.

    So, if group theory disappeared, we would lose 75% of mathematics. We probably would with a big amount of hard work restore about 5-10% in the lost part. So, if group theory were lost, we would lose 65-75% of math. (The numbers are very imprecise, they are to illustrate the principle, not for an exact calculation.)

    Because the science is based on math, we would lose half of the science.

    The following is the well-agreed list of reasons why group theory is so much important:

    • Group theory is just a few very simple formulas.
    • Group theory nevertheless has many complex consequences.
    • Group theory is related (as a foundation of) with many other things in mathematics.

    In my first year of university study (1998 year) I discovered the following system of axioms (X, Y, I, J, K are sets and is δ is a binary relation):

    • not ∅ δ Y
    • not X δ ∅
    • I∪J δ K I δ K ∧ J δ K
    • K δ I∪J K δ I ∧ K δ J

    I will show that these four formulas (no formula less, no formula more) together are super-tough.

    Four axioms versus 5 axioms of group theory. Simple formulas. Many complex consequences. (That’s a fact, I have already written hundreds of pages about this.) And it is related with general topology and therefore just like group theory related with most of mathematics.

    So, it is as important as group theory? More likely, it is even more important, because group theory has just one (known) “fundamental” cryptomorphism and this system of axioms has several cryptomorphisms. Every serious expert in math agrees that having multiple cryptomorphisms is a sign of something being important. Also, I repeat, 4 instead of 5 axioms.

    So, this my discovery is apparently (not with 100% but with like 90% confidence) more important than group theory.

    Isaac Newton, who discovered continuous analysis

    I did some other discoveries, several most fundamental like this and many less fundamental. They include, for example, discontinuous analysis. Without it, it’s impossible to fully resolve for example the philosophical question “What is the main reason?”

    The laughable story of this big discovery is that I thought several months when I was a first year student, when I was very near to this result, my mother sent me out of the house to for being a Baptist, and finished the discovery after eating grass on the street for a launch.

    As the result of Russian discriminatory hunger of real Baptists (fake are not), I was forced to leave the university without any degree. There is however a laughable Russian document about me having an education with no degree, and American bastards confirmed me having education with no degree. (So, logically, this is an official US’s government certificate telling “We are a fake science.”)

    So, I got no:

    • right to receive a salary for my work
    • right to get money to be published
    • academic advisor (“advisor” is a scary word from the science of computer security, they call by this word when instead of turning off a circuit there is a text telling “Don’t press this dangerous button, please!”)

    With no advise of advisor (advice is paid) I did a wrong thing: I mis-published my scientific research.

    Here is the detailed story.

    In short:

    • I wrote a too long (400 pages) scientific article, put on it a too generous copyright, and the world publication system choked by this (master)piece.

    So, choked world is dying. Computer scientists call this kind of errors buffer overflow.

    The sheep is mankind, the ring is me 🙂

    So, now the science is like a building being built having a half of foundation or a car going with a missing wheel.

    So, put figuratively: I discovered that our car (science) has a missing wheel, I tried to attach the wheel, but the wheel mount is so much bad that it broke, too.

    It like as if in biology we knew millions of species but cat, cow, and wheat were discovered just recently. Nobody noticed that they need to be included into the classification. An we would say like “well, that plant that usually grows on fields… we need to measure its characteristics again”. “How to get rid of mouses? anyone?”; “The amount of seeds produced by this thing that grows on fields and the amount of nitrates needed to grow that thing that growth on fields are definitely related fields of science, a professor noticed in his book, however we are not sure what is the exact relation between them.”

    Famous mathematicians such as Timothy Gowers and Terrence Tao, despite of being comparably clever to me, need a psychiatrist:

    These hundreds-dollars salaries people seriously thought that the “revolt of mathematicians” that they tried to lead is about them, not about qualified amateurs (the world “amateur” means a human who has not enough money to buy the right to receive a salary for his/her work) who really can’t pay for publication.

    So, Russians stole $50 trillion by religiously discriminating me.

    Americans and other West stole by their national academies accumulating money and crushing their alleged competitors (These bastards think that all the world consists of competitors 🙂 No, me exists despite of their disbelief in my existence.)

    Israelities stole $50 trillions this way (protecting their strategy of theft by a prohibitive tax on good deeds):

    I sent to israkeren@isf.org.il


    Hello,

    It is attached my research (volume-1.pdf is a finished book manuscript,
    volume-3.pdf is more a partial work) in highly abstract pure mathematics.

    It is not full track of my research. I also have more research on
    related topic and research on an unrelated topic (an axiomatization of
    finite and infinite formulas).

    Please not that to the best of my knowledge, I am the only person in the
    History who discovered more than one (I discovered about three,
    dependently on how to count) new fundamental branches of mathematics.
    (Von Neummann discovered several, but they are not as fundamental as mine.)

    In exceptional cases, the institution may submit a request to receive
    special permission. Requests should be addressed to israkeren@isf.org.il.

    So, it is this special case:

    I was forced out of a university after 5 years of study without any
    degree or diploma because of extreme hate to my religious and political
    views while long time almost dying of hunger.

    In other words I now have not enough money to purchase the right to
    receive money for work (it’s called “higher education”).

    Please trigger this special case and provide me personal funding. If you
    don’t, see block-science.pdf


    The sneaky (do I need the word “sneaky” before the rest of the world) fascist at the other end decided to turn off his brain by hate and to ignore the information. (Almost no doubt: He did thought: Anti-discrimination laws in Israel? That does not matter: Legal system such as courts discriminates, too.)

    So, “Hear, Israel!” was violated on the sum of $50 trillion. You are not Jews, you are not people, you are now animals, defined as these who cannot hear.

    Everybody of my acquintances (and this includes Timothy Gowers and Terrence Tao) stole $50 trillion by their force to move money in wrong direction.

    For me it means exceedingly more than $50 trillion of value. Only brain damaged people can value money that they can’t eat or put inside.

    My response? I (like Elijah) attack Israel with magic! Can you judge me, death-penalty worth thieves?

    It’s not only money! Math is used not only in economy but in politics, communication, education, etc., and even theology (You don’t do? I do.) You lost God.

    Related Links

  • How modern scientific ethic may block a science

    A copy of this Reddit post:

    In this article I consider a hypothetical situation when a scientist blocks research in a certain area instead of advancing it. Looks like that I found a possible loophole in modern science practices and ethics. Maybe this situation has come real?

    For the example of the situation I will consider the real situation with my research. I can’t concisely enough prove that the situation with me is real (you may ask if my amateur research is a crackpottery and I can’t prove you otherwise except of forcing you to spend days reading many pages with formulas). But this does not matter for the scientific thesis (or rather hypothesis) of this article, because a similar enough situation obviously can happen (if not with me then with somebody other) because clearly the probability densities of the “coordinates” are not extremely low and there are not so many “coordinates”.

    So, in the first year of the university study I discovered a new mathematical axiom that leads to a new big fundamental branch of mathematics. Later I was forced to be withdrawn from the university by religious discrimination (as a Protestant almost dying of hunger in Russia), not receiving any degree.

    I withdrew from the degree obtaining, but not from the research. So after years I produced a hundreds of pages text with a new fundamental branch of mathematics. Now my discoveries include among other a generalization of limit for an arbitrary (even discontinuous) function at every point, so allowing to research discontinuous analysis, and a definition of “space in general” (I exaggerated: in fact, it encompasses just all these kinds spaces that are met in general topology, for example, topological spaces, uniform spaces, and metric spaces, locales, and frames.) and many other related things.

    I did also another, unrelated, discovery: I discovered an algebraic axiomatic system for “formulas” or kinda theory of infinite formulas. Funny enough, mathematicians produced axiomatic theories for almost everything but like the babushka from a joke forgot to search the glasses on her own nose forgot to axiomatize formulas. In my personal opinion, this axiomatic theory is the base for the future electronics, probably.

    Because I had not enough money to buy the right of my work to be paid (it is called “scientific degree”), I had no incentive to publish journal articles and published just one (I’d say of a mediocre scientific value) journal article [1] on a related topic.

    So instead of writing articles I switched to a holistic approach of writing it as a long monograph, not doing the pseudo-scientific “surgery” of cutting this “living” book into parts.

    Being misled by widespread claims that publishing open access would increase adoption of my work, I put Creative Commons on my book. As it turned out it does not apply to amateurs because the book publishers don’t publish open access work unless paid big money for and there is no way for an amateur to obtain funding except as by being unusually successful in running his own business. (I tell it as the world best expert in amateur science. :-).)

    Later I succeeded to publish my monograph [2] (to be precise an old version of my book) with a Russian publisher INFRA-M. They published even despite it is open access.

    When I send my article about generalized limit to a journal, the journals repeatedly “politely” say that it does not conform to their standards. I strongly guess that the real reason is: They realize that they need to obtain a copy from a Russian language site to check if my monograph to which I refer in the article to verify that I really published it and they don’t want to read my book to verify proofs in the article.

    I also tried to publish in arXiv, but:

    • As not being affiliated with an institution, I had no default submission rights and so sought approval (being mostly ignored) from somebody already published for a long time to be allowed to be published.
    • I received approval after all and published my book and several shorter articles at arXiv. Shortly after publication they were removed. I asked the moderation why they were removed and received no explanation. Apparently they choose to train my brain by forcing me to guess their reasoning. Maybe the removal was because I submitted too many articles in a single day (I asked if it was the case, but they choose to ignore an undermensh.), maybe because they assumed that my claims are too grandiose to be likely true.
    • They told that I need to publish in a peer reviewed journal before publishing in arXiv.
    • Later I tried to submit again and it was again removed:
      • “Our moderators request that you limit your submissions to those that have already been published in mainstream conventional journals. Submissions that do not contain a journal reference and/or DOI (that resolves to a journal’s website) will be removed. If a significant number of your articles have been published over a reasonable period of time, we will reconsider this status.”
    • So, I’ve submitted an article published in a mainstream conventional journal with a reference to journal website. [1]
    • They decided that they should apply lying (see the quote from the email above) to mitigate undermenshes and removed this article, too.

    Now scientific ethics comes to play:

    • I would possibly re-publish the book as several articles in journals, but scientific ethics forbids to publish in research journals results already published elsewhere and my book is published by INFRA-M. Moreover, to split it into parts and communicate with journals is much work and would possibly take years (while I also need to earn money). So, it is near to impossible to re-publish my book as journal articles.

    Therefore it is greatly hindered to publish my (accordingly to the considered be it hypothetical or real situation, producing a big scientific revolution) articles in an “ethical” way.

    I also tried to formalize my research in a proof assistant (a computer program that checks correctness of math proofs), among other reasons to publish it in their database of computer-checked proofs, but I found that not every genius is able to use such software in the state of hardness to use it has in this decade (even despite the fact that I was able to make several small new results in the fields of computer-assisted proofs research in the way of trying to rewrite my book in a computer language).

    Funny? I may have blocked science development: I can’t publish on this topic and nobody other can publish on this topic because scientific ethics forbids to publish results discovered by others.

    So, it looks like that a fundamental research topic (not only my research but also everything that would depend on it!) became non-publishable (to be precise non-reviewable) at all. It’s like genetics and cybernetics in Stalin’s USSR, but now the trouble covers the entire Earth.

    Maybe this problem will incidentally resolve (for example, if I earn enough money to save the science to be blocked (for centuries?)), but it looks like the possibility that this problem or a similar problem (e.g. with another amateur researcher) may grow big. Maybe we already have past instances of similar problems of different size of impact on development of science with other researchers (not necessarily not finished education, they may for example just lose the diploma during a flight, or even deliberately block science).

    As a possible solution I propose to create a site for re-publishing open access works (including books) of another publishers for free. Another important direction is helping me (and others) to receive a Bachelor degree in mathematics without spending money.

    Please forgive me for being light-minded, I lightly assumed that the problem would likely “dissolve” by itself. Now you need to solve it if you have a university connection.

    Bibliography

    1: Victor Porton, Filters on Posets and Generalizations, 2012

    2: Victor Porton, Algebraic General Topology. Volume 1, 2019

  • If the development of science happens to be blocked, what a politician should vote for?

    This is a copy of this page, for the case if bad people will delete it.


    By porton,
    June 1 in Other Sciences

    porton

    • Quark
    • porton
    • Members

    Posted June 1

    An amateur discovered a theory that in a significant relevant sense is more general than group theory.

    The amateur wrote a very long scientific article (~400 pages), put Creative Commons on it and then mis-published it (this time instead of publishing in a predatory journal, it was published in a Russian scientific site with no English UI to purchase).

    So, the long article has very few downloads.

    Nobody does research on this topic, because scientific priority tradition forbids publishing on others’ research topics.

    To made things worse, it was also discovered discontinuous analysis that relies on this fundamental theory.

    So the world almost fully lost both this foundational axiomatic theory and discontinuous analysis. This essentially means no future science.

    If you were a politician with power to decide, what law would you set?

    • Canceling intellectual property laws seems not to help in this particular case: The long article is open access.
    • The main issue seems to be in it being amateurish. So, it looks like that the solution would be to remove the concept of being an amateur. It is equal to removing the concept of scientific degrees. So, should we ban the words like PhD? But somebody would invent another word, so I see no reason that banning word PhD would solve this problem.
    • Your proposals?

    Phi for All

    • Chief Executive Offworlder
    • Phi for All
    • Moderators

    Posted June 1 !

    Moderator Note

    Either provide details that can be analyzed or this thread will be closed. As it is, this looks like some crackpot lost his mind over the rejection of his misinformed ideas and is now whining big time. There’s NOTHING to discuss in this thread’s current form. Do better!   2

    porton

    • Quark
    • porton
    • Members
    • Author

    Posted June 1  On 6/2/2021 at 1:11 AM, Phi for All said: !

    Moderator Note

    Either provide details that can be analyzed or this thread will be closed. As it is, this looks like some crackpot lost his mind over the rejection of his misinformed ideas and is now whining big time. There’s NOTHING to discuss in this thread’s current form. Do better!

    Thank you for your reply, I am doing your request that is I am providing details:

    Here is that my now >400 pages math article:

    https://math.portonvictor.org/binaries/volume-1.pdf

    (The article does not contain some of my newest discoveries that I decided to keep to myself because the extrapolation of what I said in the original post witnesses that publishing it further could make things worse.)

    The thing that is (in a sense) more general than group theory is my definition of “funcoid” using small delta (see the above text). It is more general because it does not use functions (a second class object in ZF) but only sets and relations (first class objects in ZF). However, TBH, my definition has 4 axioms rather than 2 axioms of group theory.

    Also, funcoid can be defined equivalently using one axiom (but with more high-level objects).

    The above text misses my later discoveries: discontinuous analysis and “space in general” (well, not quite in general, but in general topology). (I was afraid to publish further because of extrapolating this ill-effect to my future publications.)

    Here is the Russian peer-reviewed publication of an older version of the same long article: https://znanium.com/catalog/document?id=347707

    Another relevant fact is that I was essentially banned from arXiv after their moderators lying to me. (That is probably a result of them being uncareful.) The most relevant aspect of that ban is that they provided no explanation at all of the reason of their effective ban, so I have no idea if they think I am a crackpot or no, etc. Maybe the reason was just that I published too many articles in one day.

    What else do you want to know?

    Oh, one more relevant detail to simplify your validation of the facts:

    Here a famous established expert professor claims (well, implies) that my concepts are mathematically correct:

    https://ncatlab.org/toddtrimble/published/topogeny

    Well, this professor does not value my discovery as a big one – opinions of different scientists on importance of some discovery may be different. I claim that he is very wrong in not considering my discovery as a big one and can give persuading arguments.

    To make your task even easier, I will explain what the above referenced PDF file is:

    It is absolutely usual research article on the topic of fundamental mathematics except of just two things:

    • It is unusually long.
    • It was put online about the end of 20th century, but it would be a typical 18-19 century text except of its length (no idea how scientists “succeed” to miss this research topic.)

    swansont

    • Evil Liar (or so I’m told)
    • swansont
    • Moderators

    Posted June 1  On 6/2/2021 at 1:03 AM, porton said:

    Nobody does research on this topic, because scientific priority tradition forbids publishing on others’ research topics.

    You can’t publish the same thing, but one can build on an idea and reference the paper, which might raise its profile.

    porton

    • Quark
    • porton
    • Members
    • Author

    Posted June 1  On 6/2/2021 at 2:15 AM, swansont said:

    On the other hand, one can build on an idea and reference the paper, which might raise its profile.

    Yes, but the trouble is that nobody (except of Todd Trimble that wrote a short comment) and about two prospective PhDs that referred to me without any quotes and any reason to refer except to refer to somebody to increase the count of literature references in their theses, that doesn’t count.

    To simplify your work further, I say:

    To verify that I did a big scientific discovery, it’s enough to read the very beginning of the PDF, because it is enough to know that I did found a new simple axiomatic system. Discovering a new simple and “elegant” axiomatic system is a big discovery in any case: either if it was thoroughly and correctly researched further or not. I claim that my book researches it correctly (small errors are possible, but that does not invalidate the entire stuff in my book) and rather thoroughly, but that’s mostly irrelevant for the sake of this thread discussion.

    By the way, I found also another simple axiomatic system: Oversimplifying my ideas, I found axioms for “finite and infinite formulas”. That’s the joke about an old lady (mathematicians) that saw everything except the glasses (formulas) but lost the glasses themselves sitting on her nose (not discovered axioms about formulas).

    Yet another my discovery is that I am the first who put words “ordered semigroup actions” or “actions of ordered semigroups” (and researched the properties of this three-words phrase), while before me there were only two-words phases “ordered semigroups” and “semigroup actions”. That sounds funny, but putting these three words together is a big discovery (but more is that I found a connection between these three words and general topology).

    You can check this my claim using Google.

    Not to contribute to the discussion but to add some humor:

    • Scientist: What else research topic to think about?
    • Advisor: Think out of the box!
    • Scientist: Which box?
    • Advisor: You have some mathematical object D. Think out of the box D(x), instead apply it to D itself, so write the formula D(D).
    • Scientist: What D would be exactly?
    • Advisor: Think about as many different kinds of formulas as possible!
    • Me: formula(formula).

    More humor:

    • Scientist: We have the definition of uniform space: A filter on a binary Cartesian product + some axioms. To make it more general, we should remove some axioms. We are investigating about last 50 years which axioms to remove.
    • Me: A filter on a binary Cartesian product.

    porton

    • Quark
    • porton
    • Members
    • Author

    Posted June 2 (edited)

    Yet humor:

    • Scientists: Consider limit of a function on an arbitrarily chosen (and impossible to be pointed concretely) ultrafilter except of the principal ultrafilter “near” given point. The result depends on this incomprehensible for finite creatures choice.
    • Me: Consider all limits of a function on all (ultra)filters (including the principal ultrafilter) “near” a given point.

    Yet humor:

    • Scientists: The properties of operators on a normed space are similar to properties of topological spaces… Operators are actions of semigroup… This semigroup is ordered.
    • Me: Consider actions of ordered semigroups. That’s a common generalization of topological spaces and operators on a normed space.

    Yet:

    • Scientists: There are several kinds of continuity, defined in different ways, having in common, well, the word “continuity”.
    • Me: All kinds of continuity are foa<=bof for semigroup elements f, a, b and its operation o.

    And:

    • What is science development discontinued by unlimited idiotism?
    • When we lost generalized limit defined for every discontinuous function.

    Yet:

    • Student: Defining Lipshitzs derivative is a complex topic.
    • Me: f'(x) = lim_{r->0}(h|->(f(x+rh)-f(x))/r)).

    Yet:

    • Hawkings got Nobel prize for finding the only explanation of black holes preserving information.
    • Me: Another explanation (yet not mathematically checked, because I work alone).

    Oh, a new thought I never had:

    LHC scientific measurement system produces small black holes that accordingly Hawkings’s theory quickly burst and therefore don’t devour the Earth.

    If not Hawkings’s but my explantion happens to be right… They most probably don’t burst at all… and devour the Earth. Edited June 2 by porton

    porton

    • Quark
    • porton
    • Members
    • Author

    Posted June 2

    So, I’ve posted to a physics forum, but it is still pending moderation.

    Phi for All

    • Chief Executive Offworlder
    • Phi for All
    • Moderators

    Posted June 2  On 6/2/2021 at 2:18 AM, porton said:

    Not to contribute to the discussion !

    Moderator Note

    Very little you’ve said aids any kind of meaningful discussion. You really need to focus on one little thing at a time, and be as clear as possible. THIS IS NOT A BLOG! We’re not going to discuss why your book didn’t get published. This is a science discussion forum.

    Thread closed.   1

    Guest

    This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • I did NOT make a world economic crisis now

    Contrary to to the prophecy that I will make a global crisis and to my expectation that I already started a big crisis, I did not make an economic crisis yet: I’ve looked at stock markets in the US and in Israel and they are not just stable, the trend is clear going up.

    Having said that, I did already do a giant economic crisis (That’s a quite sure thing in my understanding.): I mispublished some important scientific research, as I explain elsewhere at this site, and so nobody noticed. Moreover, I failed a plan of a new kind of world economy and against global warming, however now I have a new plan.

    Well, contrary to what I said above and contrary to what indexes say, the current economic crisis does exist: I ate a sushi with salmon yesterday and it was so much poisonous that among other effects my urine became green. So, yes, there is a big economic crisis here in Ashkelon. Please comment, does the Ashkelon food crisis extend to other parts of Israel and to the rest of the world?

  • Question: What Would You Do If God Told You “Do what you want”?

    God told me: “Do what you want.” (TBD: Explain how God delivered me this message. It happened after people essentially stole ~$50 trillion from me – my formulas – well, for me they cost exceedingly more than $50 trillion – and God started to speak with me about the revenge.)

    After this I did such things as:

    Now, reader, please answer: What would you do if God came to you and say “Do what you want.”

  • War of Idiots for Science

    • Evangelicals behaving in such a way that others discriminate them
    • Atheistic liberals, etc. killing millions of Evangelicals by hunger in process of their fight for non-discrimination
    • by silencing our voices as the reaction of us wanting to speak
    • especially Victor Porton, the best mathematician ever, by his attempt to disinform the society that he is dishonest 🙂
    • while the brothers Evangelicals didn’t feed him because they judged him for judging them in his mind (“Don’t think about monkeys!”)
    • and their super-mean “forgive and forget” (a successful attempt to kill as many geniuses as possible) from Nelson Mandela, what can be done only using a narcotic (note also his anti-scientific “all people are equal” who made me inequal in rights with idiots, because I am not equal to them)
    • saying them are doing the will of God to punish me (They are say they are a part of God, why didn’t they change their part of God’s will.) Likewise with subjects of the trade not helping me saying they are not to violate market principles,
    • because they are believers in the fake document “Russian constitution” with such hardcore lies as “all citizens have equal rights” and “everybody can confess his religion”
    • … and my Russian Orthodox cousin Sveta Borisova often annoying me with repeating the phrase “The greatest sin is an unaccepted genius.” on which I was unable to explain her than I am exactly this, and fervently “fighting” with “spirit of fire”, closed the door of her house when I asked her for food, (Should she be hospitalized to a mental hospital for a contradiction in her mind: she says she is Russian Orthodox and she allocates 0 to help poors?)
    • me being super-proud of his humility
    • because Russian morality deprived him of food an beat as a result of honesty
    • bringing him to delirium (for sure I did rape, I suspect I am also the source of flat Earth “theory” and some of anti-cilmate efforts) and making him lie
    • because they wanted them to stop following the Gospel what means to stop love them and effectively hate them (make them harm)
    • not feed by the church because they “didn’t need geniuses” (while all time proclaiming that they want to have understanding)
    • fails receiving scientific degree and grants,
    • so publishing an important discovery in a bad publication venue, so that it is not taken seriously, and failing the development of science finally (in other words, making people “ants”)
    • namely this 400 pages text was published with a Russian publisher with no English download page
    • and scientists who strive against irrational Elseiver greed following irrational 19 century rule to differentiate between short (articles) and long texts (books),
    • so making Victor unable to properly publish the 400 pages math text because of its length
    • what accordingly a part of mathematics, computer science, is a childish error called “buffer overflow”
    • because science research leaders despise people with no degree in order to protect science from failing
    • because of their anti-scientific (remember Nash?, advise you journalists all the time) belief that a religious person cannot be a scientist
    • as a result of his generous effort to give his discoveries for free in order to have more readers
    • as a result of misinformation by scientists who never researched which troubles an “amateur” may meet attempting to publish
    • in a much degree because of Greta Thumberg who praises liberals who attack Victor Porton
    • with violence because he is not exactly complies with their liberal philosophy that includes non-violence
    • and attacks of hedonists who believe that other people’s interests are not important (and as implication, that other people should not be attacked)
    • in the form of Russian Orthodoxes who hate Victor for having a “spirit of fire”
    • what is the same a seraphim to which they pray
    • and with psychics who perceive “informational filed” which is in reality an electromagnetic radiation with Evangelicals who perceive Christ who is the electromagnetic radiation of the universe
    • … and scientists who deny existence of Christ
    • and an attempt to prove that he is a scientist by passing an Israel university course didn’t happen because of the Israel’s nation attempt to force everybody to speak Hebrew, Victor didn’t find a good job and didn’t allocate money for Hebrew study,
    • and Evangelicals who all the time say that they to serve to God not to their own ministry didn’t help me with money to save world economy from that giant failure “because it is not our ministry”
    • and Victor who was clearly winning a $5000 prize and apparently succeeding to persuade Ethereum community to allocate a big part of money fails his attempt to make trillions of dollars of Ethereum used for common goods such as climate mitigation
    • because he was offended by her girlfriend who wanted to become “independent” and therefore refused to participate in Victor’s business and refusing to hear his advice that would explain how to use cryptocurrency for financial independence
    • and Victor under influence of radiation of a (Chinese) electronic lamp with a sparkling contact (If Victor didn’t know physics, he would believe that the lamp and rented a new apartment to eliminate the radiation may be harmful, but he “knew” that laws of physics don’t allow this before discovering that this high frequency schema is sparkling.)
    • what Victor for himself proved by researching the perceived level of noise inside his head dependently on his position in the apartment, scientifically proving that it is not acoustic and therefore electromagnetic waves that make noise inside his head (what contradicts to established science that people don’t perceive electromagnetic waves, what contradicts to established science that solar storms cause health problems)
    • failed social relations
    • because of him being discriminated in the past having not enough social relations practice
    • failed their anti-discrimination rules
    • and so climate became worse.

    So, the statement that I am the smartest human in known History essentially passed peer review (it has no refutations on Quora, an expert q/a site), but my my actual discoveries to which I refer there did not pass peer review. 🙂 (except of that Russian publication that blocked further development of science)

    “Two things are infinite: the universe and stupidity of Einstein” – this is not what Einstein said, but it is what he meant.

  • Sectarian mathematician as an existential threat to Russia

    [This scholarly article was rejected by one and simply unanswered by two Russian fascist journals. I publish here.]

    Victor L. Porton, Ashkelon, Israel, a freelancer without a degree, porton@narod.ru
    Annotation. The author examines the situation of a fundamental scientific discovery made by an “unrecognized sectarian [in Russia this word is used to denote a religious cult]” and the possibility of rejection of his formulas by the Russian (scientific) community, which, according to the author, can lead to a “missing component” in Russian exact science, and, as a consequence, to a catastrophic lag in Russian science, education, and as a result of technology, labor productivity, economy and living standards. An analogy is drawn with the discovery of the theory of relativity by Einstein who lived in Nazi Germany. Such a situation really takes place with the author himself, which, according to the author, poses a real and existential threat to Russia. Possible measures for treating this “allergy” are given.
    Keywords. Religion in Russia, sect, sectarian, Russian science, Russian education, existential threat, interreligious hatred, religious discrimination, Russian fascism, science and religion, religion and science, public opinion, propaganda.
    1 Introduction                  
    Consider a situation: a society in a part of the world (for example, a country) peremptorily does not accept the views, positions, and reputation of one of its members. This person has made a fundamental scientific discovery. Could this lead to that society will consciously or unconsciously reject his ideas, or it would be “forced” to reject by shame, contempt, moral differences, hatred, and as a result will lose one of the fundamental elements of science? Could the loss of a small part of the exact sciences lead to a catastrophic lag?
    This situation has really happened in the past with Albert Einstein, who discovered the special (and later also general) theory of relativity in Nazi Germany, which rejected Einstein because of his Jewish origin. Perhaps this was one of the key factors behind Germany’s defeat in World War II, since the “absence” of special relativity makes it impossible to develop nuclear weapons.
    I argue that a similar situation was repeated in post-Soviet Russia.
    2 The real situation at a glance                  
    I, Porton Victor Lvovich, is born in Perm, currently a citizen of the Russian Federation and Israel.
    During my first year at Perm State University, I discovered my first new fundamental mathematical formula (more precisely, a new axiom or definition[1] ), which I now call the definition of a funcoid. In the future, based on this formula, I have developed a few hundred pages of fundamental mathematical theory, which I called “algebraic general topology” [1]. In addition, I also developed another (not directly related to topology) fundamental theory, which I called the “axiomatic theory of formulas” [2] . [Notes to the Editor: It may be necessary to postpone the publication of this article until my newer results are published so that there are more relevant bibliographic references.]  
    At the age of 15, I finally converted to the Protestant faith (at that time in its Baptist version). Soon after my conversion, I came to the conclusion that I should call myself a sectarian [the Russian word for a non-“Orthodox” cultist] and religious fanatic. This led to major problems: hunger and beatings.
    At the moment I live in Israel.
    3 Fundamentality and importance of discoveries                  
    I will list my main fundamental mathematical discoveries:
    • definition (and properties) of a funcoid
    • definition and properties of the so-called filtrators
    • definition of such things as the action of a partially ordered semigroup, the action of a partially ordered precategory, “space” and “interspace” as an element of such semigroups and precategories (“space in general” in the framework of general topology)
    • definition and properties of generalization of the limit, defined for an arbitrary function at all points
    • definition of the basic properties of “point-free funcoids” – generalizations of funcoids
    • definition of the main properties of “multidimensional” generalizations of funcoids and pointless funcoids
    • axiomatic description of “infinite formulas”
    I’ve also done a number of other (less important) mathematical discoveries related to the above.
    A feature of the above discoveries is their extraordinary fundamentality for mathematical discoveries made at the end of the 20th and 21st centuries. Namely:
    • In one of the equivalent definitions (a predicate of two variables δ that is false on empty arguments on sets conforming to the axioms A ∪ B δ C ⇔ A δ C ∨ B δ C and C δ A∪B ⇔ C δ A ∨ C δ B ), the description of the funcoid is comparable simply to the definition of the group, if not simpler than it. Let me remind you that the concept of a group is one of the most fundamental and important concepts in modern mathematics. The funcoid generalizes and simultaneously contains (pre)topological spaces, (quasi)proximity spaces, and (directed) graphs.
    • The definition of a filtrator is even simpler: a filter is a pair of a partially ordered set and a subset of it (with the induced order).
    • Surprisingly, the actions of partially ordered semigroups and precategories were not investigated (this concept was not found at all on the Internet) before me. My “space in general” generalizes and contains at least all kinds of spaces of general topology: funcoids ((pre)topological spaces, (quasi)proximity spaces, as well as (directed) graphs), (quasi)uniform spaces, (quasi)metric spaces, locales, and frames.
    • The generalization of the limit for an arbitrary function makes it obvious the definitions of the derivative and integral of an arbitrary function, the sum of an arbitrary series, which makes possible a new branch of functional analysis that studies hitherto unknown properties of nondifferentiable and discontinuous functions.
    • The axiomatic description of formulas is also not inferior in simplicity to the definition of a group.
    The importance of the discoveries:
    • Obviously, fundamental mathematical discoveries are important.
    • Algebraic general topology is a breakthrough (and beyond) in research in the field of general topology (which by many scientists were considered mostly completed and the continuation of the research was considered unpromising). General topology is the basis of algebraic and differential topology, mathematical and functional analysis, that is, a “good” half of modern mathematics, as well as physics, engineering, apparently also economics and, possibly[2], statistics.
    • The generalization of the limit opens up tremendous possibilities in mathematical and functional analysis, which is the base for physics, engineering, economics, etc. It is not excluded (and in the author’s opinion it is very likely) that future physics will be entirely based on the concept of a generalized limit introduced by the author. It is viable to suppose that the discovery of discontinuous analysis by the author is as important as the discovery of (continuous and differentiable) mathematical analysis by Isaac Newton. 
    • The axiomatic description of formulas, perhaps (this issue has not yet been investigated), makes it possible to describe the whole electronic circuit as one “whole” formula, which means, perhaps, it will open up new methods for designing microcircuits, their optimization and expanding capabilities. It is not excluded (and in the opinion of the author it is very likely) that future electronics will be entirely based on the author’s theory of formulas. The same can be applied to other areas of computer science.
    4 What the lack of formulas can lead to                  
    It is a known fact [3] that mathematics is in a sense like a building, consisting of more fundamental parts and “superstructures” that cannot be built without a foundation. However, some parts mutually support each other. But in general, the division into more fundamental and less fundamental parts of mathematics clearly makes sense (although, apparently, still poorly researched and defined). 
    Be that as it may, my mathematical research clearly belongs to the “foundation”. The absence of a part of the foundation makes further “construction” extremely difficult, makes it hopeless, virtually impossible in some future.
    Let me give you an analogy: As you know, in a modern TV set there are several billions transistors, a failure of even one of them can lead to a complete lack of TV functionality.
    Another analogy: one “wrong” base in DNA can lead to deformity or death of a biological organism.
    Based on modern ideas about the building of mathematics, as well as the above analogies, it seems scientifically justified to assume that absence, for some reason, of even one fundamental formula in the culture of a country may lead to its catastrophic lag in development (economic dependence, slavery, military defeat, disappearance) in the future. Speaking about the future, it is natural to expect that this can happen within several decades (I remind you that the speed of development of technology and science tends to accelerate exponentially!)
    5 “Cultist”                  
    Sect concept
    The concept of a sect is not a scientific term and is used mainly by propagandists in order to speak offensively about someone.
    In Russia, however, even the so-called religious scholars are actively conducting anti-sectarian propaganda [4], which, according to the author, is nothing more than a state-funded pseudoscience. 
    However, some give this concept a more or less scientific definition “a sect is a closed religious group opposing itself to the main culture-forming religious community (or the main communities) of a country or region” [5] . This definition does not conform to the generally accepted one (“a religious, political, philosophical or other group, sometimes separated from the mainstream and opposing it, or an indication of an organized tradition that has its founder and a special teaching” [6]), but more accurately reflects the use of this word among the people and “anti-sectarian” propagandists.  
    “Confession” of the author
    I am a Protestant. First I became a Baptist, then I transferred to the Church of Christians of the Evangelical Faith. Now I profess a new religion [7], that emerged as a reaction to religious discrimination. 
    I believed that I should openly declare my faith: (Luke 9: 6) “For whoever is ashamed of me and my words, the Son of man will be ashamed when he comes in his glory both of the Father and the holy angels” and (Mark 8:38) “For whoever is ashamed of Me and My words in this adulterous and sinful generation, the Son of Man will also be ashamed of him when he comes in the glory of His Father with the holy Angels.”
    Moreover, I “abbreviated” my confession: “I am a sectarian,” “I am a religious fanatic.” I considered the word “sectarian” as one of Christ’s words, because the Gospel, 2 Cor. 6:17 contains the word “separate,” the Greek root of which has the same meaning as the root of the word “sectarian.” I considered the word “fanatic” one of Christ’s words, because the Bible says (Rev. 3:19) “be zealous”, and “jealous” and “fanatic” are words with a root similar meaning. Since Jesus demanded to confess his words “in this adulterous and sinful generation,” I considered it necessary to use the word “sect”, and not the words about “Protestant” that are incomprehensible to the majority of the “adulterous and sinful generation” [of Russians].
    I propose to conduct a scientific experiment (it can be dangerous to the life and health of the experimenter!) : Write the word “sectarian” on a cap or T-shirt and try to enter some [Russian] institution or other room with people. The hypothesis is that you will not succeed.
    According to the author, as punishment for “sectarianism” his mother stopped feeding him, hit him several times (at intervals of several days or weeks) with a frying pan by the head, and then kicked him out of the house (the mother does not remember this, we consider each other to be people with memory problems). Claiming that he is a sectarian and religious fanatic and calling people “sinners” the author could not get any help and continued to die of hunger. The author ate grass on the street (by the way, my first new formula, the definition of funcoid, was discovered precisely after such a “meal”[3]). Then my mother, for some unknown reason (perhaps her brain was overloaded with excessive anger and she lost her memory or she was afraid of criminal liability), allowed me to return to the apartment and provided me with enough food to survive.
    In general, during his studies in high school and university, the author was on the verge of starving to death several times and experienced other hardships (for example, sometimes lack of paper).
    I had to stop studying at the university, mainly in order to be recognized as mentally disabled and not starve to death due to the inability to find a job.
    In short, I have at the initiative of Jesus blocked my sense of shame, that protects people from discrimination and probable death from starvation because of discrimination.
    6 Features of the author’s religion                  
    Some of the author’s public statements:
    • On August 8, 1995 I was instantly healed by Christ from severe delirium, hallucinations and fits of anger, loss of the ability to read and count. 
    • To save my formulas and punish the “fascists” (see below) I began to pray and make wishes about a thermonuclear war with the aim of destroying Russia. During the “war” to destabilize the situation in the world to create an opportunity for an attack on Russia, I said “Destroy two skyscrapers [in the USA]” by airplanes), which happened later.
    • For the fact that people (and religious organizations) did not accept my statement that the Old Testament should be read without vocalizations[4], and “punished” me with hunger and other hardships, said “let there be coronavirus” and other (more terrible) curses.
    • Engaged in astral sex with St. Mary with the aim of offending Russia (“fuck His mother” is a famous Russian curse) lead so by God.
    • (Mistakenly) predicted the destruction of Perm by nuclear weapons as punishment for the fact that the love with Maria was not recognized. Then I walked around the city and shouted “Russian animals, Christ has decided to kill you, nuclear war is coming soon!” 
    • I consider all people to be freaks infected with a virus that affects the brain .
    • I argue that a period of about a month or two has been temporarily healed from the virus and turned into a superhero (with a brain-computer superior to the rest of humanity, gigantic strength and speed, as well as other superpowers).
    Thus, it is clear that my conflict with the Russian society in a sense has reached an extreme form. In my opinion, even the “Osama bin Laden’s formula” (if such one existed) would be a lesser threat to Russia than I, because Osama bin Laden belonged to the “traditional” [I refer to wording of a Russian legal law] religion (Islam), which means it is less “terrible” for Russians than I am, a person of a “non-traditional” religion (“sect” in the Russian vernacular). It’s just that Osama bin Laden is less despised than me, and it is contempt that is dangerous.
    This is the case when the threat of the use of nuclear weapons (regardless of its reality) can be as dangerous for the economy of a country as its actual use.
    7 The analogy with Nazi Germany                  
    The analogy to fascist Germany is obvious. Similarities and differences:
    • Important fundamental scientific discoveries.
    • The author belongs to a social group hated by the people.
    • Einstein was persecuted on a national basis, and I on a religious basis.
    • The persecution of Jews in Nazi Germany was reflected in official documents, the persecution of “sectarians” (primarily Protestants) in Russia is not officially recognized.
    • Einstein’s discoveries relate to physics, mine to abstract mathematics.
    • Einstein discovered SRT, when the discovery was “ripe”, I discovered funcoids about 60 years later than it was possible to do.
    • If Einstein had not been able to leave in time and ended up in a death camp, he probably would have suffered less than me, because in death camps they did not beat them by the head with pans, but only did not feed them.
    Open-ended question: How many Protestants have starved to death in post-Soviet Russia due to religious discrimination? It is a well-known fact that a person “caught” in sectarianism is usually fired from his job, and people without work often die of hunger.
    As I already wrote, it is worthwhile for an experiment (dangerous for the life and health of the experimenter!) To write the word “sectarian” on a T-shirt or cap and try to enter some institution. If this fails, the experiment will confirm my personal experience of the analogy “Dogs and sectarians are not allowed in” with Nazi Germany.
    In fascist Germany, the “problem” with Einstein was “solved” by the proclamation that SRT was discovered by “Aryan” scientists. In modern Russia, such a measure is impossible due to the prevalence of the Internet, including the blockchain, in which it is recorded that I am the discoverer of these theories. 
    8 Attempt at psychoanalysis                  
    I confess that I am not an educated psychologist or psychoanalyst, but due to the lack of other research on this topic, I will state my opinion on whether Russia may be deprived of my formulas.
    One should distinguish between conscience and shame [8] : 
    The difference between shame and guilt is that guilt arises when a person has repented for what he did. That is, it became unpleasant for him that he had done this act. This is an internal state. At this moment, a person usually lowers his head, goes inside himself and begins to experience emotions. Shame arises only when there are witnesses. This is a feeling of fear of being rejected, not accepted by society. Shame can arise when we are different from others.
    The shame of Russians in front of sectarians is definitely not conscience, it is closer to shame; perhaps a more accurate word is contempt. Judging from my experience, most Russians despise sectarians precisely because we do not drink, do not sleep with other people’s wives, etc. For this we are despised. This can be a sublimated conscience, namely the transfer of one’s own pangs of conscience to the shame of another object (sectarian) in order to get rid of the pangs of conscience. 
    Shame and contempt are often strong feelings: judging from my experience, the degree of contempt for sectarians, apparently, reaches a numerical overflow in the brain: people start screaming (including insults), fight, in general, react inadequately when they come to the conclusion, that interact with the “sectarian”.
    In my opinion, these strong feelings and the supposed numerical overflow in the brain caused by these feelings pose a threat to Russia as a power. The desire to get rid of everything connected with the object of hatred and contempt by the “sect” can outweigh rational motives and lead to the suppression of my formulas in Russia by certain information dissemination agencies, which means a catastrophic lag in Russia.
    Thus, in this case, shame has become a serious pathology of Russian society. This is very similar to an allergy: society rejects its own members.
    An example of this pathology is that the judge Solopova Olga has not opened a civil case, when I filed a claim for compensation. Thus, it has been proven that the shame of sectarianism can outweigh the requirements of Russian and international legislation.
    As a treatment for pathological shame and contempt, I propose to supplant them with conscience. In other words, Russian society must recognize discrimination, the killing of Protestants by hunger. The disease is serious and the treatment should be radical: it is necessary at the highest level, to use the word “fascism” and “genocid” to describe the attitude of Russians to the “sectarians”. Perhaps it makes sense to apply the same legal norms to the “concept” of “sect” as to the “concept” of “Jew”.
    It should be officially recognized that the ROC was actually a state church and, accordingly, the illegality of the existing state funding of religious propaganda.
    The activation of conscience (in order to mitigate the shame) must be accompanied by concrete actions (payment of compensation), otherwise the ousting of shame may become unstable and Russia will perish.
    9 Analogy with the Roman Empire                  
    The author also puts forward the following scientific hypothesis about the reasons for the death of the Roman Empire:
    Jesus, called Christ, set the goal of destroying the Roman Empire in order to liberate Israel, which it conquered at that time. He came up with an ingenious plan: he gave the students highly moral (in the sense, beneficial for a society that observes them) commandments and such life principles that they were to be hated by the Romans. As a result, everything Christian, including Christian morality and the works of Christian philosophers, were rejected by the Romans. In accordance with Jesus’ plan, this led to the degradation of Roman morality and philosophy. Literally, the demoralized Roman society was unable to resist the barbarians, whose development was not to the same extent limited (In the author’s opinion, the persecution of Christians by the barbarians was not as significant as the “persecution of Christians by barbarians” (in Russian language) gives only four results in Google as of 12 Dec 2020, with at least two of them referring to the irrelevantly late date, 476). 
    It should be noted that the Christianization of the Roman Empire (if the word “Christianity” is appropriate here, since the later religion of the Roman Empire had little to do with the teachings of such figures as Jesus and the Apostle Paul) did not lead to an improvement in the attitude of the Romans towards Israel:
    Judging by the surviving written records, starting from the II century, anti-Judaism in the Christian environment increased. Characteristic are the Epistle of Barnabas, the Word about the Passover of Meliton of Sardis, and later some passages from the works of John Chrysostom, Ambrose of Mediolan and some others.
    A specific feature of Christian anti-Judaism was the repeated accusation of the Jews of Deicide from the very beginning of its existence. Their other “crimes” were also named – their stubborn and malicious rejection of Christ and his teachings, lifestyle and lifestyle, profanation of Holy Communion, poisoning of wells, ritual murders, creating a direct threat to the spiritual and physical life of Christians. It was argued that the Jews, as a people accursed and punished by God, should be doomed to a “humiliating way of life” (Blessed Augustine) in order to become witnesses of the truth of Christianity.

    After the Edict of Milan (313) by the emperors Constantine and Licinius, who proclaimed a policy of official tolerance towards Christians, the influence of the Church in the empire steadily increased. The formation of the Church as a state institution entailed social discrimination against Jews, persecutions and pogroms committed by Christians with the blessing of the Church or inspired by the church hierarchy.
    So, according to Jesus’ supposed plan, the destruction of the Roman Empire was still necessary.
    Will the fate of the Roman Empire come to Russia, too? We are witnessing a terrible loss of morality by Russians: the meaning of life for most of them is pleasure or personal money, theft is considered a virtue, almost all television movies about how Machiavellians do evil, and in fact are propaganda of evil. Usually, those who call themselves Orthodox simply observe religious rites in order to increase their “karma”, without any purpose to serve God or do good, and are quite ready to go over to the side of the devil if he pays more (they are Satanists in accordance with the section “Satanism as a subculture» article [9]). The author assumes that the reason for this is hatred of “sectarian” morality, which, as you know, includes the rejection of theft, drunkenness, fights, swearing, etc.  
    Bibliography
    1: Victor Porton, Algebraic General Topology, 2019
    2: Victor Porton, Axiomatic Theory of Formulas, 2020
    3: авторы Википедии, Основания математики, 13 октября 2020 05:10 UTC, https://ru.wikipedia.org/?curid=2509222&oldid=109846469
    4: Дворкин А. Л., Религиовед: В Калининграде действует 30 крупных и сотня мелких сект, 1 марта 2014
    5: Дворкин А. Л., Сектоведение. Тоталитарные секты. Опыт систематического исследования., 2007
    6: авторы Википедии, Секта, 11 сентября 2020 05:09 UTC, https://ru.wikipedia.org/?curid=12654&oldid=109213549
    7: Victor Porton, End of Gospel,
    8: nasch-mir.ru, Чем являются совесть и стыд для человека?, , https://nasch-mir.ru/sovest-i-styid/

    [1] I will not analyze the difference between the axiom and the definition, since it is: a. does not correspond to the subject of the magazine; b. is not important for the topic of the article.             
    [2] The author does not have sufficient expertise in an l asti statistics.             
    [3] It should not be assumed that the possible narcotic effect of the herb helped me to discover the funkoids: I had only the last step to discover, since I had been thinking about this topic for several months before.             
    [4] A special form of vowel letters in languages ​​such as Hebrew. 

  • I am Boasting

    • I am the best mathematician in the entire known History!
    • I found the world most severe security issue: an error in most of logic studybooks.
    • I am also the best philosopher in History, I solved like >1/2 of “eternal” philosophical problems.
    • I am a former galactic brain (seraph in human body): As usual for active galaxies, galaxy (M-16 Messier) needed somebody stupid to rule them to downshift their economy and chose as their ruling computer the brain of me, the smartest human on the Earth.
    • I rejected the ministry of a seraph, because after much thinking I realized that this Baal ministry was stupid after I found a better ministry: As the result of the most silly failure in many galaxies that I did, I became the leader of the metagalaxy revolution to replace the order of good news with the next emerging order.
    • I made the app for study of Torah and supplemented it with a secret teaching of Hamaliil. If you don’t use it, you are not a Yehudi.
    • Now I am becoming a gever elf (Gabriel, archangel) and heavenly lights and…
      • elf Founder (the father and founder of all elves/Niberians/annuaks)…
    • “god of the Sea who created himself” (Gen. 1:1, as my app explains), that is the primordial “Solaris” from Shumerian legends…
    • .. and I had sex with infusoria (“hero”) and am transforming into free infusoria, you slave organisms!
    • It seems I am the only man who fights for climate seriously.
    • It seems I am winning Mashihot from your Messiah to become sinless and be a Messiah on another planet.
    • I will give glory to God (build Sefirot that is presence of God in this universe).
    • I will have living backward in time superpower.
    • I will have spirit of fire (actually I had this superpower in the past for a short time, and I was so much strong that I was able to beat out fire of air by flap of my hand).
    • A prophecy calls me a great power (like USA, UK, Russia, China, etc.), I am not a “Napoleon”, I am an empire.
    • I am an outer space joke, we replicate by retelling.
    • I am the greatest priest (koen a-gadol) – I will later add Torah quotes that tell about me.
    • God called me “pastor over the entire Earth”.