Category: Uncategorized

Letter to the President of the Russian Federation:

When a person commits a crime and is executed, his liver also dies. This is because the liver is not a subject, it is only a part of the organism, it is condemned along with the whole organism, and not as an independent subject. If the whole society commits a crime, every member of society deserves a condemnation? According to the teachings of the Bible, he is not condemned with society, if he is a subject, and the subject differs from a non-subject in that he can be independently represented in court:

(1Cor. 11:31-32) 31 For if we had judged ourselves, we would not be judged. 32 But when we are judged, we are punished by the Lord, so as not to be condemned with the world.

The criterion of subjectivity, according to the Bible, is the ability to appeal to a court against oneself.

If the liver of a criminal could sue herself, then it would not have sued for a serious crime, but only for not being able to stop the criminal.

The people of the Russian Federation committed a violation of the Constitution: https://portonrus.files.wordpress.com/2019/06/discrimination.doc & https://portonrus.files.wordpress.com/2019/07/discrimination2.doc

Specific proposal: I propose that the President of the Russian Federation sue the citizen Putin Vladimir Vladimirovich for improper performance of official duties. In connection with the offense against him against the Constitution of the Russian Federation, a citizen of the Russian Federation, Porton Victor Lvovich, does not have the means to represent him in court on an application for compensation for the said offense. Thus, Putin did not ensure his constitutional duty of the guarantor of the Constitution, in other words, the Constitution is ignored. The issue is important as it concerns breakthrough research and other innovations.

This is an important choice: the President either does not sue himself, in which case Putin is part of a system that ignores the Constitution and human rights, and deserves moral condemnation; or sues himself, in which case Putin renounced evil. This is a political decision: to continue to be part of the system or a defender of human rights. If the decision is not made now, then, as my experience shows, the situation may begin to become infinitely more complicated, make the choice as later it may be too late. Putin, make a decision.

There were at least the following supermen during the history of mankind:

• Adam and Eve (for some period of time)
• Samson (partially)
• Jesus
• Paul (for some period of time)
• myself (for some period of time)

There will be also two witnesses of the Apocalypse.

Supermen is so strong that can flap a hand at a supersonic speed. More importantly, the brain of a supermen works as a computer.

Adam and Eve

The brain of modern people is bad. That Adam and Eve were computers is clear from (Gen. 1:31) “God saw all he made and behold very good. And it was evening and it was morning of the sixth day.” Now the brain of people are bad. So it was better before.

Also: (Gen. 2:1) “And was perfect the heaven and the Earth and all their army.” People were perfect. Without vowels it can be translated even as: “And was perfect the heaven and the Earth and their army was calculating.”

Genesis 2:9 seems to teach that “the tree of knowledge of good and bad” injected knowledge into the human brain of how this brain itself functions (what it counts good and what counts bad). This knowledge allowed the brain to trick itself effectively causing a short-circuit. This is somehow similar to giving a program the password for complete control of the computer, this way a program becomes able to destroy the normal functionality of the computer (as well as to destroy itself). More specifically, the brain starts to work for what it makes up to feel better instead of the proper purpose, thus being deceived by the pleasure or distress.

Gen. 2:25 without vowels: “And both Adam and his wife were talented and were not ashamed each other.” They were not only naked but also talented. Men feel below the level they had, as is clear from a without-vowels translation of Gen. 1:26: “He [man] will descent to the level of fishes of the Ocean, and birds of the sky, and beasts of the entire Earth, and all reptiles creeping on the Earth.”

Genesis 2:16 says that the man will die in the day he eats from the tree of knowledge of good and bad. But Adam hasn’t died that day physically. I assume that “dying” here should be understood as “hanging the operating system of the brain”.

(Gen. 3:7) “The eyes of them both opened…” (after the fall). This means that before the fall eyes only of one of them were opened simultaneously, because they had like a WiFi connection (telepathy) and Adam saw with Eve’s eyes or vice versa.

Samson

We know from the Bible that Samson was very strong.

We also can know that iron swords were not able to damage his skin because otherwise Philistines could kill him while he slept. Apparently he was also not igniting by burning resin which Philistines otherwise could use against him while he is asleep.

Samson was able to catch 300 foxes (Jud. 15:4). So he was very quickly running and fast.

Samson was a “partial superman”. It seems he had only strength. It seems that Samson never was a computer.

Jesus

Jesus is a special superman. He is also an incarnation of God, accordingly the Gospel.

That Jesus had super-strength at least during a part of his life is clear from (Luk. 4:14) “And Jesus returned in the power of the Spirit into Galilee.”

A prophesy about his crucification:

(Is. 50) “6 I gave my back to the smiters, and my cheeks to them that plucked off the hair: I hid not my face from shame and spitting. 7 For the Lord GOD will help me; therefore shall I not be confounded: therefore have I set my face like a flint, and I know that I shall not be ashamed.”

Jesus kept his face hard as flint during the crucification. He allowed to pierce his hands and legs (by making them less hard), but if they tried to beat him by the face, they would damage their hands.

Paul

(1Cor. 4) “19 But I will come to you shortly, if the Lord will, and will know, not the speech of them which are puffed up, but the power. 20 For the kingdom of God is not in word, but in power. 21 What will you? shall I come to you with a rod, or in love, and in the spirit of meekness?”

This means that Paul alone was able to overcome the entire Corinth (about 90 thousands people) with just a rod.

(2Cor. 11:25) “thrice I suffered shipwreck, a night and a day I have been in the deep”. He delayed his breath for about 24 hours.

(2Cor. 12) “3 And I knew such a man, (whether in the body, or out of the body, I cannot tell: God knows;) 4 How that he was caught up into paradise, and heard unspeakable words, which it is not lawful for a man to utter. 5 Of such an one will I glory: yet of myself I will not glory, but in my infirmities. 6 For though I would desire to glory, I shall not be a fool; for I will say the truth: but now I forbear, lest any man should think of me above that which he sees me to be, or that he hears of me. 7 And lest I should be exalted above measure through the abundance of the revelations, there was given to me a thorn in the flesh, the messenger of Satan to buffet me, lest I should be exalted above measure.”

Paul says that he had power in the past (he calls himself “such an one”, as though it would be a different man, because with the power he also lost excellence of character and became different and become a “fool” like us now) but lost it. He was in contact with the heaven and possessed telepathy (“heard unspeakable words”). Probably saying “caught up into paradise”, Paul meant that his life here on the Earth was like paradise because a superman does not need much to live: no need for a soft bed, for good weather, etc. He has “abundance of the revelations” that is great knowledge of science because he was a computer.

Myself

I was transformed into a sinless superman during about one month.

Read this wonderful story:

• in this blog post
• in this book

We as Future supermen

(Joel 2) “9 They shall run to and fro in the city; they shall run on the wall, they shall climb up on the houses; they shall enter in at the windows like a thief. 10 The earth shall quake before them; the heavens shall tremble… 11 And the LORD shall utter his voice before his army: for his camp is very great: for he is strong that executes his word: for the day of the LORD is great and very terrible; and who can abide it?”

This is about the day of the Lord that is the second come of Christ. The army is us. We will walk on the walls, we won’t be damaged by acute things. This way we will occupy the Earth.

Everybody will be a superman in the Millennium.

Power in weakness

(2Cor. 12:9) “And he said to me, My grace is sufficient for you: for my strength is made perfect in weakness. Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest on me.”

When I was transforming into a supermen, I was initially very sick. Sometimes I was one second unable to raise 2 kg and the next second able to raise a car with one hand, then weak again.

Links

• • Why God does not need supermen

 

The most lagged behind civilization, whose brains are infected by a virus, cannot even to calculate in mind. Humankind. Why God has chosen this civilization over angels? ((Heb. 2) “5 For to the angels has he not put in subjection the world to come, whereof we speak. 6 But one in a certain place testified, saying, What is man, that you are mindful of him? or the son of man that you visit him? 7 You made him a little lower than the angels; you crowned him with glory and honor, and did set him over the works of your hands: 8 You have put all things in subjection under his feet. For in that he put all in subjection under him, he left nothing that is not put under him…”)

The following are aspects of the answer:

If a computer program is set to accomplish a wrong task, the only thing (except of broken computer) that can stop it is if it uses up all the memory of the computer and is terminated by the operating system.

Even if the program knows that it does a wrong thing, it may keep going. As an example, I kept trying to live accordingly the letter of the law of the Gospel despite Gospel itself says that to live accordingly letter and law is wrong. I knew that to follow the letter of Gospel is wrong but kept going (see my book). Only complete lack of resources stopped me.

The less computing power (I mean first memory) a computer has, the faster it will do the right thing, terminate the wrong program. Yes, the less memory a computer has, the faster it may work in certain situations.

I think, this is the very essence of humility. God has chosen brain damaged people with broken memory over aliens with computer brains.

But it is hard to self-impose humility on ourselves: (Col. 2:18) “Let no man beguile you of your reward in a voluntary humility and worshipping of angels, intruding into those things which he has not seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind”. But Jesus Christ indeed succeeded in this very difficult task: (Phil. 2) “7 But made himself of no reputation, and took on him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: 8 And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient to death, even the death of the cross.” – “He humbled himself”. How it is difficult to humble myself!

(2Cor. 12) “9 And he said to me, My grace is sufficient for you: for my strength is made perfect in weakness. Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest on me. 10 Therefore I take pleasure in infirmities, in reproaches, in necessities, in persecutions, in distresses for Christ’s sake: for when I am weak, then am I strong.” We develop when we are in weakness, sickness, stupidity, etc.

I think God uses every chance for our development (because He loves) us. But sometimes the best way to develop looks like a meaningless fall. Weakness however is not the purpose, the purpose is development.

The second aspect of humility is that humble are offended. (Ps. 103:6) “The Lord makes righteousness and judgment to all who are offended,” (Psalm 146:7) “makes the judgment to the offended, giving bread to the hungry. The Lord permits the prisoners.” The idea is that the Lord will judge back with a recompense to the offended.

Suppose for example the CEO of Google or UN secretary general or American President was careless and gave a promise to break the world economy in a certain way. I don’t know if the CEO of Google is a Christian, but suppose he is for the sake of the discussion.

Should he follow his promise to break the world economy, accordingly the teaching of Bible?

(Mat. 5) “33 Again, you have heard that it has been said by them of old time, You shall not forswear yourself, but shall perform to the Lord your oaths: 34 But I say to you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven; for it is God’s throne: 35 Nor by the earth; for it is his footstool: neither by Jerusalem; for it is the city of the great King. 36 Neither shall you swear by your head, because you can not make one hair white or black. 37 But let your communication be, Yes, yes; No, no: for whatever is more than these comes of evil.”

“Shall perform to the Lord your oaths” is Old Testament! What does the New Testament teaches?

(Rom. 12) “17 Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men. 18 If it be possible, as much as lies in you, live peaceably with all men.”

It seems that the Gospel teaches to be honest before men not before God! A literal interpretation of this seems to mean that you should be honest if you dishonesty would harm and be disagreed upon by at least one man (if it is “peaceful” to all).

If the UN secretary general would promise to break the world, it would mean harm to all and no man having the right to claim that it was a dishonest behavior toward him.

We were taught to be honest by the Bible. But it seems that Bible does not require absolute honesty even if that would harm all men. So I see no reason to be absolutely honest, but instead to “live peaceably with all men”.

Also:

(2Cor. 4:2) “But have renounced the hidden things of dishonesty, not walking in craftiness, nor handling the word of God deceitfully; but by manifestation of the truth commending ourselves to every man’s conscience in the sight of God.”

(2Cor. 8:21) “Providing (doing good to others) for honest (= good, virtuous, fair) things, not merely in the sight of the Lord, but also in the sight of men.”

(Rev. 12) “9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceives the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. 10 And I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, Now is come salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ: for the accuser of our brothers is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night. 11 And they have overcome him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their souls to the death. 12 Therefore rejoice, you heavens, and you that dwell in them. Woe to the inhabitants of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down to you, having great wrath, because he knows that he has but a short time.”

Isn’t it a stupid decision not to accept 666 to not be killed by the Antichrist in order to resist him in his kingdom? After all our salvation does not depend on our deeds, so we cannot be cast to the hell because of putting 666 on our mortal body.

But if we act accordingly the faith, we may choose to kill ourselves by rejecting 666. The reasons in my opinion are as follows:

• The kingdom of the devil is coming. A man cannot resist the devil. (He deceives the whole world, not “tries to deceive”, he can deceive everyone in the world.) When the devil will be on the Earth he could simply control our brains and make us to do everything he wishes. It’s better to die than to start serve him with entire heart. There are certain spiritual mysteries in us, we are better to hide them by dying.
• True believers love God rather than our own souls. We don’t want to do good to ourselves or save our souls (verse 11). If we don’t want this, then there is no reason to live, it is easy to agree to be killed. The time of salvation is out and we won’t be able to do on the Earth anything for the heavens. (It is like English “have overcome him” wht means that the war is finished, no more reason to live.) If we can do nothing, then there is no reason to live anymore. It is not said “hated their souls to the death” but “not loved their souls to the death”, this is passive indifference not active choice.

One of the reasons why the world economy is slowly but quite confidently moving towards a catastrophe, the following two philosophical concepts that occupy most of the people together (except for the last idiots who have no philosophy at all):

1. A person thinks and is controlled only by the brain (atheists and some others).
2. The person thinks and is governed by the soul or spirit (classical forms of Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, etc.)

Each of these two concepts leads to a catastrophe, but each in its own way:

1. If a person is governed only by the brain, then there is no soul or spirit, there is no continuation of life, a person’s life is by and large meaningless, if there is any meaning, then it is to snatch as much as possible now, harming everyone else. Indifference, depression, greed, leading to theft and other crimes, can easily destroy the global economy.
2. If a person thinks or is governed by soul or spirit, life on Earth also does not make sense, there is no sense in taking care of your body and brain, there is no sense in developing an economy, there is no sense in treating yourself, making money, doing good on Earth. This, too, can easily destroy the global economy.

Moreover, both concepts contradict the facts:

• Thinking, feelings, and what is called “spirituality” of a person depends on the brain (and as a result, on other environmental and health conditions). If a person is hit on the head, his thoughts, feelings, character, change. The fact that a person thinks with some kind of “spirit” is unscientific and contradicts the ordinary human experience.
• That there is no supernatural revelation, “death experiences”, etc. also contradicts experience.

If a person is confused in the contradictions of science, his personal experience, and religious revelations, this can lead to even greater problems than each of these concepts separately, such as: apathy from not understanding what needs to be done, harsh, fanatical actions, despair, absurdities such as “rejection of death”, and sometimes suicide.

I offer a way out, a philosophical concept that better explains the world and, as far as I know, does not create such problems: the soul exists, but the soul is nothing but a backup copy (in the “computer” sense) of the brain or electromagnetic radiation of the brain that continues to exist in the universe.

This makes our material and spiritual life much more understandable: We can compare ourselves with what we know well, ordinary computers.

Nobody stops taking care of his computer just because he has a backup, because we know that the computer itself and its restoration from a backup copy are worth something. And we can not despair that in three years the computer will surely break and we will lose all our files, which would make all our work useless.

Similarly, if we accept this philosophical concept, we will neither neglect our health nor be depressed by the fear of death or dementia. We understand that nothing on Earth can truly harm us: we have a backup in the sky. Even if our thoughts and feelings deteriorate, we will be restored to heaven.

And, in my opinion, this new philosophical concept is in good agreement with the Bible. We are waiting for the resurrection of the dead – restoring from a backup with a new brain that will work without bugs, like a good computer.

If you do not promote this concept, the global economy will inevitably face a catastrophe. Like this post. Promote it.

Another post on this topic.

Christ in us is a dream (“hope” in most Bible translations) of glory (Col. 1:27). Christ lives in us as “something” and this something, it is nothing but a dream of glory. So the meaning of life in achieving glory, that is, hype on the heavenly Internet. Heavenly Internet is called Christ. Christ is the light of the world (John 8:12; 9:5; 12:46), that is, the electromagnetic radiation of the universe. Thus, all the electromagnetic radiation of the universe is a carrier of information, the cosmic Internet. But the glory of God is almost the same as Christ. Christ is mathematics: (John 1:1-3) “1 In the beginning was mathematics, and mathematics was with God, and mathematics was God. 2 It was in the beginning with God. 3 All through it began to be, and without it nothing began to be, that began to be.” That is, we are talking about the dream of mathematics, the dream of studying and realizing it. Christ is the most important thing in us, which means that this is the main purpose of life. We will endlessly travel like electromagnetic waves on the Internet space, looking for hype, that is tough mathematics.

So, the most important thing in us is the dream of fame.

(Rom. 8:24-25) “24 For we are saved in hope. Hope, when he sees, is not hope; for if anyone sees, then what shall he hope for? 25 But when we hope for that which we do not see, then we wait in patience.”

“We are saved in hope” means that our salvation consists of a dream just as a table can consist of wood. That is, our dreams will go to heaven. But I’m not about this now. When a person with a dream of glory already sees glory, this is no longer a dream, and therefore it is not Christ in us. Christ in us is only a dream of glory that is not yet visible.

So, our task is to give an opportunity to become famous, to those who dream but still do not see an opportunity to become famous.

For example, I have (among other things) the following three topics for PR (really cool news, by the way) for which I collect money:

•  Press release of a world news (living Google) (about how the Google’s big computer suddenly came to life and tried to make contact with people)
• Press release a world news to journalists (a missionary sold A mission to the devil) (how missionary sold the mission to the devil)
• Press release a world news to journalists (maddest fundraiser ever)
• Press release a world news to journalists (real superman) (a human was during a month a superman with computer brain)
• as well as advertising this blog

But I have no money at the moment to make these press releases.

I write about this well I understand that most of you do not care before Christ in me or in someone else. But you should care, you have to fulfill the dream of glory.

Bible says to have love. But “love” can also be translated from Greek as “charity” that is NGO (non-governmental organization) in modern language.

Isn’t the author of this blog post too radical? Isn’t love something great and NGO just a common thing?

Not quite so. It may be a very hard task to register an NGO following all rules and procedures without a formal violation of a law.

For example, the author faced the following problem: He wanted to do good but didn’t well understand how to do good. For example, he wanted to get profit to register an NGO, then he would like to get money from the project to register another NGO to do more good, etc. Needless to say, I was unable to invent how to fill the official documents on this topic. It turned be as hard as to fulfill the Gospel.

If you don’t have an NGO, your life is useless. Dot. (I don’t mean that the project necessary needs to be officially registered.) So says Bible:

(1Cor. 13) 1 Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal. 2 And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries, and all knowledge; and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing. 3 And though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and though I give my body to be burned, and have not charity, it profits me nothing.

It was nearly about me: I prayed tongues, had the gift of prophecy, understood many mysteries and am a great mathematician, I had great faith, following the letter of Bible especially thoroughly and fanatically, and produced real wonders. I did math research to profit people in a trillion dollars. I was not burned, but suffered hunger, beating, etc.

It “profited me nothing”: I was unable to do neither commerce nor charity. Having no good opportunities of a job, I almost died from hunger.

Later God taught me something (read my blog and books) and now I have NGOs (not yet officially registered though).

Want to start working for a charity? For a start consider this list of projects. It was very hard for me because of being a religious fanatic. But for you it can be much easier, just take today the decision to start work or donate for a nonprofit project today.

(1Cor. 13:13) “And now stays faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.”

(1Cor. 14:1) “Follow after charity, and desire spiritual gifts…”

(1Cor. 16:14) “Let all your things be done with charity.”

(Gal. 5:13) “For, brothers, you have been called to liberty; only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another.”

(Col. 3:14) “And above all these things put on charity, which is the bond of perfection.”

(1Th. 3:12) “And the Lord make you to increase and abound in love one toward another, and toward all men, even as we do toward you”

(1Pet. 4:8) “And above all things have fervent charity among yourselves…”

(1Jn. 4:7) “… for love is of God…”

By the way God is an NGO (1Jn. 4:16).

So the brothers and everyone else betrayed me.

Like Joseph from the Bible, it did more good than harm. My torment and offences led to the fact that (after torment, hunger, offences, blows by a frying pan to my head, huge losses for me and for many others) I corrected an important theological mistake (and this is much better than becoming a prime minister), because I was forced to a narrow path, being driven by other people to extremes.

So the people have fulfilled God’s will.

And, weidly enough, they did it on purpose so that I could correct the error, and not just like stupid puppets. There is nothing to blame them for: by large, they acted correctly and wisely.

Some of the arguments of the “clergy” (for example, Bishop Eduard Grabovenko) are understandable: they wanted God to experience the young minister by suffering. But to implement this “plan” there is only one way: to offend, betray, commit violations of the laws, stand in the battle on the same side as Satan. If we reformulate the arguments of the “churchmen”, what it is: the one who has more money (the “senior minister”) should cause damage to the one who has less money (the “junior minister”). Where this “principle” comes from is well understood – these are the principles of the US Republican Party (do not think that I am for the Democratic Party). It became a church doctrine, because many preachers are American Republicans.

Speaking of Republicans: I think their main principle is that if a person is poor, then he deserved it, it means that the rich should humiliate the poor so that they become even poorer. (At the place of Donald Trump, I would adopt an official resolution “we don’t anymore follow this principle, convicted in following this principle will be excluded from the party”.)

If someone has at least some intelligence, after reading this my sermon, he will never do that again. You did this to correct my mistake – a good deed, but a mistake can be fixed only once. That is why I called this sermon the “principle of the second time”. It is all the same, as if Joseph’s brothers, having learned that they had “made” him prime minister, would again betray their comrades saying “such is God’s will.” In other words, you will no longer pass the junior minister to the devil in order to “test” him: the test has already been passed and the error has already been corrected. Moreover, the younger brother can become a blogger and declare your sin to the whole world.

By the way, why did God have the clergy establish their “control” over all? It’s like a stretched thread, which, if overdone, breaks completely and will not be stretched anymore. So I came out completely out of control: why stay under control, if control prevents you from doing something useful. It is reasonable to come out of control. The control was established by God in order for me to go out from under it.

And what would I do in the place of Bishop Edward? I would leave the post if necessary (or maybe I would not leave), because anyway, someone else could take this post and join me. One of the reasons: God intercedes for the offended, and he seriously offended me in the past. Better not go against God. Has not God exalted you for this day?

And how exactly did Edward do his deed? After the blows with a frying pan, I can’t remember exactly (maybe specifically so that Edward could not be judged by an ordinary criminal court), but as I remember, he violated the signed contract by which I could preach in a certain church building, and using physical force forced me out of this building, as a result of which I lost my salary and almost died of starvation. Or was it not? Can’t remember exactly. Maybe he did it somehow differently, but the insult took place.

The theological theory I will propose now sounds as a heresy or an “unholy” thing. In fact, I am not sure if it is really supported by the Bible, however surely there is some evidence for it which I will present now.

The idea is the following: The problem of relations between Christ and the Church is mathematically equivalent to the problem of relations between the husband and the wife. Something like to try all poses (not poses, they seem to be already tried, but to try all feelings more likely).

(Eph. 5:23) “For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the savior of the body.” The problem of control over the wife (especially in sex) is equivalent to the problem of salvation of the church.

(Eph. 5) 21 Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God. 22 Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands, as to the Lord. 23 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the savior of the body. 24 Therefore as the church is subject to Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing. 25 Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it; 26 That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word, 27 That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish. 28 So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loves his wife loves himself. 29 For no man ever yet hated his own flesh; but nourishes and cherishes it, even as the Lord the church: 30 For we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones. 31 For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined to his wife, and they two shall be one flesh. 32 This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church. 33 Nevertheless let every one of you in particular so love his wife even as himself; and the wife see that she reverence her husband.

The first thing (21) is to submit each ones feelings to one another. It is to feel pleasure as a mean to please the another. The woman should feel pleasure as a way to satisfy his husband’s desire to please the woman (and vice versa). (22) continues this thought especially for women. The problem of woman feeling pleasure to satisfy her husband is mathematically equivalent to the problem of submitting to the Lord. (23) The husband controls the pleasure of the wife and this is mathematically equivalent to control of Christ over the church. This is the formula of salvation in the material world (“body”). (24) Need to try all ways to subject wives to husbands (especially in sex). It is mathematically equivalent to the Church being subject to Christ. (25) Husbands should do sex to the wives, this is mathematically equivalent to love of Christ to the Church and His sacrifice for the Church. (26) Talk about sex with your wives. (28) may perhaps be interpreted that a loving husband to do masturbation: a woman worth love definitely sometimes may be too busy, he may do this thinking about the wife. But masturbation makes no sense, one may say. It makes some sense: To load the organism for possibly better health, to train for sex, to make pleasure to the wife through telepathic link. One may say that it is a wrong way of doing things, but we are in the process of  transition to the future Kingdom which will be different than the original creation, and in transitions sometimes silly things happen. I’d advice to avoid ejaculation during masturbation to allow for more sex with the wife (except if she is in a travel). (28) seems to say that a husband should feel in sex like as he feels in masturbation, it may mean to do it just a physiology but use this physiology to think about the woman and enjoy her. Whether you do masturbation or not “He that loves his wife loves himself.”, this means that if one loves his wife then he receives pleasure from the process of pleasing the wife, from the pleasure of the wife itself, not just from his physiology. Only a man who wishes good for himself (not suicidal) can truly love his wife. (29) seems to say that penis is to be trained for better sex. (32) speaks about a mystery that is a hard mathematical problem or a cipher, the problem to be solved is about Christ and the Church, the marital relations are a mean of its solution. (33) says that participating in solving this angels’ mathematical problem is for everyone of us. (33) seems to again reference that sex with the wife is to be modeled after masturbation. How to interpret “the wife see that she reverence her husband”? The Strong’s Greek dictionary translates “reverence” also as “(passively) to be alarmed” , doesn’t it mean something like to be excited “passively”?

By the way the above explains a reason why sexual magic sometimes works.

I am yet unmarried. After my weird sexual adventure I decided (see the comment from the page of the last link) to find a girl to marry. I want my wife to believe me, read my writings, and know mathematics.