The main(?) difference between a few tens years ago and now:
- Tens years ago: Nash: “I am [literally: my time is] infinitely more important than you[rs].
- Now: Everybody: “I am infinitely more important than you[rs].”
The main(?) difference between a few tens years ago and now:
After an intense tense I felt bad for a few hours. I also felt something “spreading” inside me.
Now I am starting to feel better.
I think, I had a trombus (apparently, as a result of vaccination) and it was torn out. It looks like the result is good, I am recovering.
What a psychological portrait is used for?
It is used to present a personality as an empty form, without any content such as knowledge and views.
The word management is often used to denote a particular pseudoscience:
Myth: Every problem has a solution.
Reality:
Everything can be done with a TODO list.
I can prove the theorem that every solvable problem (about insolvable problems see above) can be solved in an efficient way using TODO lists, if we know what is the suitable TODO list for this particular problem.
Draw diagrams, TODO lists, etc.
If I did this when writing my math book, I would do… after having a million or billion pages TODO list.
So, often the hiring criterion on ruling position is conformance to this pseudoscience.
There are many problem classes that have no algorut
When I was 5 years old, I realized that humanity will perish from greed. Everyone around is crazy greedy.
I wasn’t particularly smart at the time: I almost died trying to fly holding a balloon. And it was in economy, too, that I was not particularly smart: I sent Gorbachev a proposal to add zero to the money so that everyone would become 10 times richer. But I understood the result of greed perfectly.
Jesus suffered as a man, why then it is said that God suffered for him? Isn’t this a nonsense?
I have an explanation: On the heaven, there were used big computational resources to control the brain of Jesus so that he to continue to say God’s words, not to fall into madness because of overloaded by the tortures brain and say something like a common human in madness instead of saying God’s word.
The Holy Spirit in his brain kept controlling the situation, but that was very computationally expensive. This is the suffering of Christ in heaven to spend resources on this computation.
In various cultures, there is the concept of a “spiritual intermediary” human between this world and that world.
Probably I understood what is the issue:
Apparently, the powerful outer space spirits (cosmic plasma) and spirits here on the Earth act on different electromagnetic frequencies. To control earthy spirits, heavenly spirits may need a retranslator on the Earth. And a human brain can serve as this retranslator.
So, if this concept is true, heavenly spirits control earthy spirits trough humans. This explains how humans could participate in spiritual wars despite being spiritually weak by themselves.
There is a widespread heresy. Its adepts say “Mind your own business.”
The heresy is to do only your own projects and not do projects of others.
Look into my Bible translation: (Phil. 2:4) “Look not every man on his own projects, but every man also on the projects of others.”
One man asked God to show him the paradise and hell. God showed him a long table with food, people seating along it opposite to each other, having very long spoons. It was so both in paradise and in hell. What is the difference, wondered the man.
God showed him that in the hell people cannot eat because the spoons in the dream were too long to reach their mouths, so they were hungry. In paradise, they feeded people on the opposite side of the table with their long spoons.
It’s a true thing. There would be no Linux, for instance, if people would not participate in somebody other’s project, a project of Linux Torvalds. Those who follow this principle, live in the hell (use a bad OS, Windows), these who participate, can use much better software (Linux, et al).
The life on the Earth is so bad, first because people mind their own businesses.
Another Bible quote: “Love your neighbor as yourself.” This means one thing: to participate in the projects of your neighbor in the same way (“as yourself”) as you do for your own projects.
Well, also need not fall into another extreme: to share everything and live in socialistic or communistic poverty. We know our own projects better than projects of neighbors, so we usually do our own business better than the business of a neighbor. However, if a neighbor does a more important deed than you, accordingly Bible, you should sell your business and give the money to your neighbor. Otherwise, you don’t even think to follow the golden rule, it’s not about you, aren’t you a heretic? This is what to love your neighbor means.
P.S. Sell your business and send me money for my projects, including mathematical research or for example this social project.
Since Martin Luther we stopped to pray to heavenly saints and angels. Is it biblical?
Certainly Luther was right that Bible disallows to pray with icons:
(Exodus 20) “3 You shall have no other gods before Me. 4 You shall not make for yourself an idol of any kind, or an image of anything in the heavens above, the earth below, or the waters under the earth. 5 You shall not bow down to them or worship them…” (the Study Bible)
But properly translated verse 3 means rather: “You shall not have other gods above me.” It means not to put anyone above Yahweh. The verse 5 means properly “Don’t bow down to them and don’t work for them.”
Where does it say “Don’t pray to them?”
The word Yahweh is similar to the word “being” in Hebrew. It seems that this word means “the essence of being”. The word “Elochim” (God) is a plural word originally meaning “gods”. So “Yahweh Elochim” put simply means “the essence of gods”. This mean that Yahweh is a composite entity, the democracy of gods. Consider matrix (several numbers) in mathematics: It is several numbers but it is considered as a whole: It can be for example denoted by one letter, two matrices can be multiplied in the same way as if they were just two simple numbers, etc. Elochim is a composite entity, gods considered as one object. In Bible the word Elochim despite of being plural in word derivation is often used as singular (e.g with a singular verb) in a sentence. This means that all gods are considered as a whole, as one God.
Yes, (Deuteronomy 10:17) “For the LORD your God is God of gods, and Lord of lords, a great God, a mighty, and a terrible…” and (Psalms 95:3) “For the LORD is a great God, and a great King above all gods.” God is exactly this, the authority (“king”) in the kingdom of gods.
So when we pray to God, our prayer is heard by gods and the answer to a prayer is their collective decision.
So “Elochim” (God) is the community of gods considered as a whole, “Yahweh Elochim” (God Yahweh) is the essence of this community, its central authority, like a democracy.
It does not make sense if God is whole or consists of parts: God takes many different isomorphic forms, some of which could be considered as a whole, some as a community.
Usually the word Elochim is interpreted as either an expression of greatness of God expressed by a plural number or as an indication to the Trinity. In my opinion, it is stupid human idea to think that plural number is used just to express greatness, it misses the grammar. This is an explanation arising from having no other known explanation. If Elochim is taken as the Trinity, it would also look quite silly: Does Bible repeatedly tell about a set of three elements? This would be like to “these tree do this and this…”, sounds silly for me. Also the word Elochim often does not have an article before it. If it word mean a set of three elements, it would necessarily have the article. Even in English “a three men” would be a nonsense, the same applies to ancient Hebrew. So my interpretation looks much more viable.
Here is the full list of the verses from KJV version of the Bible that translate the word Elochim as gods (that is in plural).
(Ex. 23:13) “… and make no mention of the name of other gods, neither let it be heard out of your mouth” (should be “a name” rather than “the name”) seems to mean not to mention names of groups (because here “gods” is in plural) of other gods, like not to pray to “all saints” or to “spirits of the nature”.
Also note: (Exodus 18:11) “Now I know that the LORD is greater than all gods: for in the thing wherein they dealt proudly he was above them.” This means that Yahweh Elochim is greater than a sum of its parts.
What are idols? Idols are entities in the spiritual world specifically created to represent relations with a thing on the Earth. A human is an idol. Human spirit is the part of the heaven having relations with this human. Consider saint Mary. Her heavenly spirit is the heavenly reaction to the body of a woman living here 2000 years ago. So saint Mary is an idol. Human have no inherent significance on the heaven. Our spirits should not be overestimated. Likewise myself is an idol. I hate my soul, it is not a proper heavenly thing. I don’t want a human on the heaven. I want clean pure mathematics not the mathematics I know. The grain (soul) should die to bring a fruit.
So what the Bible clearly commands not to do about “other gods”?
Then I see no reason not to pray to particular forces of nature: the Sun and stars, quasars, other outer space plasma, winds, water, trees. Bible says that stars are alive: for example, (Ps. 148:3) “Praise you him, sun and moon: praise him, all you stars of light.” – only living things can praise. Even mushrooms are probably more clever than people, we could start communicating to them. Only don’t serve or worship to them. Bible also repeatedly says not to afraid of gods.
I was in a great confusion: If I as some preachers advise “proclaim” things aloud, doesn’t it mean that I pray to other gods? If I pray silently God hears anyway, isn’t the only reason to proclaim aloud is to be heard by other gods? Now I see no reason to refuse to pray to them. We can make proclamations and be heard by forces of nature who would help us.
However:
(Matthew 6:6) “But you, when you pray, enter into your closet, and when you have shut your door, pray to your Father which is in secret; and your Father which sees in secret shall reward you openly.”
We to keep some secrets when we pray. We are not to be heard by all forces of nature. Some are evil: (1Cor. 10:20) “… I would not that you should have fellowship with devils.”
What are “gods”? (Jn. 10) “34 Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, You are gods? 35 If he called them gods, to whom the word of God came…” Here Jesus explains what the word “gods” mean: gods are the entities who can hear the word of God.
Conclusion: Christians should be pagans.
At first that Christ learned obedience (Hebrews 5:8) looks like a contradiction: How can He learn if He already knows everything?
But we know from mathematics that behavior of infinite things is different than of finite ones: For example, if we move an infinite plane, it remains in place. If we increase its size, it remains of the same size. In the same way Christ expands His knowledge while His knowledge is already complete.
Nearby verses of the Bible emphasize that Christ is the Son of God. “Son of God” means “infinite development, infinite grow” as to grow to become similar to the Father is the main property of a son. Thus Christ learns all the time.
(Heb. 5:8) “8 Though he were a Son, yet learned he obedience by the things which he suffered; 9 And being made perfect, he became the author of eternal salvation to all them that obey him”.
We see that He learned a certain thing, obedience. To learn obedience is not the same as to learn something outside of us, it is to learn about what is inside us, our own obedience.
We see that despite of being exceedingly great, Christ is like a regular child: He does not want (exercise to find a verse in the Bible) to learn obedience by suffering. He obeys the command of the Father unwillingly, “Let not my but Your will be!”
So Christ did not love mankind so much to be willing to suffer for us. He wanted to leave this game. He wanted to abandon the mankind and stop doing good for us. He is much more important than the mankind. (In fact He is much greater as he the “light” (electromagnetic energy) of the universe and thus occupies the entire heaven.) Father send him to sufferings to teach Him something, saving mankind was a secondary purpose.
Let’s conmtinue:
(Heb 5:9) “And being made perfect, he became the author of eternal salvation to all them that obey him.” After He learned, He was able to become the author of a very difficult thing, salvation of sinners.
Recently Christ has terminated the New Testament and stopped salvation of unrepented sinners. He enjoys this ending of a punishment from the Father, what for Christ was being solving this difficult task to save the people.