Telosism (the Biblical Post-Christian Religion)

Category: Uncategorized

  • Management as a pseudoscience

    The word management is often used to denote a particular pseudoscience:

    Myth: Every problem has a solution.

    Reality:

    • There are many problem classes that have no algorithm of solution (a theorem from 1st year of a computer science college, the proof is very easy).
    • There are theorems that cannot be nor proved nor disproved. Well, they indeed can be proved if we add a new axiom (for example, taking the theorem itself as an axiom 🙂 ).
    • There are math problems that can be solved, but the shortest solution may be arbitrarily long: E.g. there are problems that require 2100 steps. (I don’t remember the proof of this theorem, but an expert can easily invent such a hard problem.)

    Everything can be done with a TODO list.

    I can prove the theorem that every solvable problem (about insolvable problems see above) can be solved in an efficient way using TODO lists, if we know what is the suitable TODO list for this particular problem.

    Draw diagrams, TODO lists, etc.

    If I did this when writing my math book, I would do… after having a million or billion pages TODO list.

    So, often the hiring criterion on ruling position is conformance to this pseudoscience.

    There are many problem classes that have no algorut

  • What I comprehended in the age 5 years

    When I was 5 years old, I realized that humanity will perish from greed. Everyone around is crazy greedy.

    I wasn’t particularly smart at the time: I almost died trying to fly holding a balloon. And it was in economy, too, that I was not particularly smart: I sent Gorbachev a proposal to add zero to the money so that everyone would become 10 times richer. But I understood the result of greed perfectly.

  • What are sufferings of Jesus Christ

    Jesus suffered as a man, why then it is said that God suffered for him? Isn’t this a nonsense?

    I have an explanation: On the heaven, there were used big computational resources to control the brain of Jesus so that he to continue to say God’s words, not to fall into madness because of overloaded by the tortures brain and say something like a common human in madness instead of saying God’s word.

    The Holy Spirit in his brain kept controlling the situation, but that was very computationally expensive. This is the suffering of Christ in heaven to spend resources on this computation.

  • Why an Spiritual Intermediary is Needed?

    In various cultures, there is the concept of a “spiritual intermediary” human between this world and that world.

    Probably I understood what is the issue:

    Apparently, the powerful outer space spirits (cosmic plasma) and spirits here on the Earth act on different electromagnetic frequencies. To control earthy spirits, heavenly spirits may need a retranslator on the Earth. And a human brain can serve as this retranslator.

    So, if this concept is true, heavenly spirits control earthy spirits trough humans. This explains how humans could participate in spiritual wars despite being spiritually weak by themselves.

  • A Widespread Heresy

    There is a widespread heresy. Its adepts say “Mind your own business.”

    The heresy is to do only your own projects and not do projects of others.

    Look into my Bible translation: (Phil. 2:4) “Look not every man on his own projects, but every man also on the projects of others.”

    One man asked God to show him the paradise and hell. God showed him a long table with food, people seating along it opposite to each other, having very long spoons. It was so both in paradise and in hell. What is the difference, wondered the man.

    God showed him that in the hell people cannot eat because the spoons in the dream were too long to reach their mouths, so they were hungry. In paradise, they feeded people on the opposite side of the table with their long spoons.

    It’s a true thing. There would be no Linux, for instance, if people would not participate in somebody other’s project, a project of Linux Torvalds. Those who follow this principle, live in the hell (use a bad OS, Windows), these who participate, can use much better software (Linux, et al).

    The life on the Earth is so bad, first because people mind their own businesses.

    Another Bible quote: “Love your neighbor as yourself.” This means one thing: to participate in the projects of your neighbor in the same way (“as yourself”) as you do for your own projects.

    Well, also need not fall into another extreme: to share everything and live in socialistic or communistic poverty. We know our own projects better than projects of neighbors, so we usually do our own business better than the business of a neighbor. However, if a neighbor does a more important deed than you, accordingly Bible, you should sell your business and give the money to your neighbor. Otherwise, you don’t even think to follow the golden rule, it’s not about you, aren’t you a heretic? This is what to love your neighbor means.

    P.S. Sell your business and send me money for my projects, including mathematical research or for example this social project.

  • Christians Should be Pagans. One God is Plural

    Since Martin Luther we stopped to pray to heavenly saints and angels. Is it biblical?

    Certainly Luther was right that Bible disallows to pray with icons:

    (Exodus 20) “3 You shall have no other gods before Me. 4 You shall not make for yourself an idol of any kind, or an image of anything in the heavens above, the earth below, or the waters under the earth. 5 You shall not bow down to them or worship them…” (the Study Bible)

    But properly translated verse 3 means rather: “You shall not have other gods above me.” It means not to put anyone above Yahweh. The verse 5 means properly “Don’t bow down to them and don’t work for them.”

    Where does it say “Don’t pray to them?”

    The word Yahweh is similar to the word “being” in Hebrew. It seems that this word means “the essence of being”. The word “Elochim” (God) is a plural word originally meaning “gods”. So “Yahweh Elochim” put simply means “the essence of gods”. This mean that Yahweh is a composite entity, the democracy of gods. Consider matrix (several numbers) in mathematics: It is several numbers but it is considered as a whole: It can be for example denoted by one letter, two matrices can be multiplied in the same way as if they were just two simple numbers, etc. Elochim is a composite entity, gods considered as one object. In Bible the word Elochim despite of being plural in word derivation is often used as singular (e.g with a singular verb) in a sentence. This means that all gods are considered as a whole, as one God.

    Yes, (Deuteronomy 10:17) “For the LORD your God is God of gods, and Lord of lords, a great God, a mighty, and a terrible…” and (Psalms 95:3) “For the LORD is a great God, and a great King above all gods.” God is exactly this, the authority (“king”) in the kingdom of gods.

    So when we pray to God, our prayer is heard by gods and the answer to a prayer is their collective decision.

    So “Elochim” (God) is the community of gods considered as a whole, “Yahweh Elochim” (God Yahweh) is the essence of this community, its central authority, like a democracy.

    It does not make sense if God is whole or consists of parts: God takes many different isomorphic forms, some of which could be considered as a whole, some as a community.

    Usually the word Elochim is interpreted as either an expression of greatness of God expressed by a plural number or as an indication to the Trinity. In my opinion, it is stupid human idea to think that plural number is used just to express greatness, it misses the grammar. This is an explanation arising from having no other known explanation. If Elochim is taken as the Trinity, it would also look quite silly: Does Bible repeatedly tell about a set of three elements? This would be like to “these tree do this and this…”, sounds silly for me. Also the word Elochim often does not have an article before it. If it word mean a set of three elements, it would necessarily have the article. Even in English “a three men” would be a nonsense, the same applies to ancient Hebrew. So my interpretation looks much more viable.

    Here is the full list of the verses from KJV version of the Bible that translate the word Elochim as gods (that is in plural).

    (Ex. 23:13) “… and make no mention of the name of other gods, neither let it be heard out of your mouth” (should be “a name” rather than “the name”) seems to mean not to mention names of groups (because here “gods” is in plural) of other gods, like not to pray to “all saints” or to “spirits of the nature”.

    Also note: (Exodus 18:11) “Now I know that the LORD is greater than all gods: for in the thing wherein they dealt proudly he was above them.” This means that Yahweh Elochim is greater than a sum of its parts.

    What are idols? Idols are entities in the spiritual world specifically created to represent relations with a thing on the Earth. A human is an idol. Human spirit is the part of the heaven having relations with this human. Consider saint Mary. Her heavenly spirit is the heavenly reaction to the body of a woman living here 2000 years ago. So saint Mary is an idol. Human have no inherent significance on the heaven. Our spirits should not be overestimated. Likewise myself is an idol. I hate my soul, it is not a proper heavenly thing. I don’t want a human on the heaven. I want clean pure mathematics not the mathematics I know. The grain (soul) should die to bring a fruit.

    So what the Bible clearly commands not to do about “other gods”?

    1. Not to serve them. It is like not to serve your wife, your country, your children, your business, serve only to Yahweh.
    2. Not to serve to idols. What we make ourselves, even on the heaven, like saint Mary is not to be served.
    3. Not to sacrifice to them. We should not grow idols.

    Then I see no reason not to pray to particular forces of nature: the Sun and stars, quasars, other outer space plasma, winds, water, trees. Bible says that stars are alive: for example, (Ps. 148:3) “Praise you him, sun and moon: praise him, all you stars of light.” – only living things can praise. Even mushrooms are probably more clever than people, we could start communicating to them. Only don’t serve or worship to them. Bible also repeatedly says not to afraid of gods.

    I was in a great confusion: If I as some preachers advise “proclaim” things aloud, doesn’t it mean that I pray to other gods? If I pray silently God hears anyway, isn’t the only reason to proclaim aloud is to be heard by other gods? Now I see no reason to refuse to pray to them. We can make proclamations and be heard by forces of nature who would help us.

    However:

    (Matthew 6:6) “But you, when you pray, enter into your closet, and when you have shut your door, pray to your Father which is in secret; and your Father which sees in secret shall reward you openly.”

    We to keep some secrets when we pray. We are not to be heard by all forces of nature. Some are evil: (1Cor. 10:20) “… I would not that you should have fellowship with devils.”

    What are “gods”? (Jn. 10) “34 Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, You are gods? 35 If he called them gods, to whom the word of God came…” Here Jesus explains what the word “gods” mean: gods are the entities who can hear the word of God.

    Conclusion: Christians should be pagans.

  • Of Christ learning obedience

    At first that Christ learned obedience (Hebrews 5:8) looks like a contradiction: How can He learn if He already knows everything?

    But we know from mathematics that behavior of infinite things is different than of finite ones: For example, if we move an infinite plane, it remains in place. If we increase its size, it remains of the same size. In the same way Christ expands His knowledge while His knowledge is already complete.

    Nearby verses of the Bible emphasize that Christ is the Son of God. “Son of God” means “infinite development, infinite grow” as to grow to become similar to the Father is the main property of a son. Thus Christ learns all the time.

    (Heb. 5:8) “8 Though he were a Son, yet learned he obedience by the things which he suffered; 9 And being made perfect, he became the author of eternal salvation to all them that obey him”.

    We see that He learned a certain thing, obedience. To learn obedience is not the same as to learn something outside of us, it is to learn about what is inside us, our own obedience.

    We see that despite of being exceedingly great, Christ is like a regular child: He does not want (exercise to find a verse in the Bible) to learn obedience by suffering. He obeys the command of the Father unwillingly, “Let not my but Your will be!”

    So Christ did not love mankind so much to be willing to suffer for us. He wanted to leave this game. He wanted to abandon the mankind and stop doing good for us. He is much more important than the mankind. (In fact He is much greater as he the “light” (electromagnetic energy) of the universe and thus occupies the entire heaven.) Father send him to sufferings to teach Him something, saving mankind was a secondary purpose.

    Let’s conmtinue:

    (Heb 5:9) “And being made perfect, he became the author of eternal salvation to all them that obey him.” After He learned, He was able to become the author of a very difficult thing, salvation of sinners.

    Recently Christ has terminated the New Testament and stopped salvation of unrepented sinners. He enjoys this ending of a punishment from the Father, what for Christ was being solving this difficult task to save the people.

  • Unfair advantage for mankind

    Because you are a cunt, you don’t send me money. So it would be better for the mankind that I would be a thief to compensate this your failure because this way I would have more money for such things as math research or writing free software, what is much more important than a small harm (like death of a thieved old woman of hunger) I would cause by stealing.

    So, it would be better if I were a thief?

    Today I’ve just realized a reasonable reason why not.

    In the human business, there is the concept of unfair competitive advantage: If one helps a business like a charity, it is not considered a good deed because it harms its competitors (whether the business is highly successful or not).

    I think the same applies to humankind as a whole: If I would unfairly help mankind, it is not a good deed, apparently (because it would probably harm aliens, as despite human civilization is not successful, Bible prophecied a great future for it).

    You should work in a charity, not do something else. You should help in a fair way. This is what I consider good before God.

  • A shocking theological theory about word of God

    We assume that “word of God” means “Bible”. Is this a founded statement?

    I propose an alternative theory: “word of God” means in Bible any mathematics (anything what is absolutely true). So, “2+4=4” or “The lattice of funcoids is isomorphic to the lattice of filters on the lattice of finite unions of Cartesian products.” would be also to be called “word of God”.

    I used a computer program to search all occurrences of the phrase “word of God” in the Bible. I found no occurrence which I would have a significant trouble to substitute this phrase with the word “mathematics”.

    Do the same, search for all occurrences of the phrase “word of God” in the Bible and try to substitute this phrase with mathematics. It is striking to consider this substitution for every particular of the found verses.

    This theological theory is shocking, because it overthrows our understanding that word of God is just the Bible.

    Well, Bible is a word of God, the Bible is mathematics. We know that somehow (we don’t know how) the Bible is the entire structure of all mathematics, “full word of God”.

    This would mean that we in some sense heavily over-relied on Bible. We know that Bible is true. But if to be a word of God means just to be mathematics, then it appears that we had no reason to assume as we assumed that Bible applies to every life situation. Mathematics is always true but a piece of mathematics does not apply to every particular life situation. We repeatedly misapplied the Bible. It was because we assumed that the word of God is personal. Mathematics is not “personal”, that is when we hear some mathematics we have no reason to assume that it is a word personally to us.

    Consider this Bible fragment translated in an unusual way. I applied it to myself and behave in a very silly way. If it is just mathematics, not a word of God personally to me, it becomes apparent.

    Christ is the word of God. He is mathematics. That is Christ is the entire mathematics. Everything that began to be, began to be through Him that is through mathematics. Read my book.

  • Apocalypse: a possible scenery

    In this blog post I will consider a theological scenery possible in my opinion.

    It differs of the traditional theological theory that two witnesses of the Apocalypse are Ilia and Enoch, born again to die. But what if the traditional interpretation is somehow wrong? It is not mathematics, in theology there is a place for errors and misunderstandings.

    The following is possible in my opinion, I am in no way sure that it will really happen this way.

    As my previous blog post says, I invented a new religion: The New Testament is terminated just like as it terminated Old Testament, because New Testament terminates itself.

    So I am not more a slave of God (I was a slave of God in the age of New Testament.) and thus the Apocalypse does not apply to me, because the Apocalypse is addressed to slaves of God (Rev. 1:1).

    So if I live in the age of Apocalypse, but Apocalypse does not apply to me, who am I? I am a witness rather than a participant of the Apocalypse. Thus am I not a witness of the Apocalypse?

    There are currently two followers of my new religion: me and my girl. There are no any other followers as I know from the fact that nobody sent me money: if a person believed me, he would send me money. So there are currently two witnesses of the Apocalypse.

    It remains to receive power and start to prophecy 1260 days and nights without an interruption. (This is called “the contact with the humankind.”) I already once had power like this already. I was transformed into a superman and computer for about a month. Maybe God will do it with me (and my girl) again? Well now I am not particularly spiritually strong I am not clothed in sackcloth like the two witnesses should be. (But in the past I behaved this way: For example, once I felt in love to an unbelieving stupid girl and to force myself not to marry her, I got ten iron sticks and pierced my body with them to feel pain and forget this silly love. I need power from God to receive the force of will again, because now I even eat to much chocolate, etc. I may need to feel pain from sackcloth to preserve in power.)

    OK, the verses of the Apocalypse:

    1 And there was given me a reed like to a rod: and the angel stood, saying, Rise, and measure the temple of God, and the altar, and them that worship therein. 2 But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not; for it is given to the Gentiles: and the holy city shall they tread under foot forty and two months.

    The temple is our new religion. The Gentiles are these who don’t believe us, including the evangelical churches.

    3 And I will give power to my two witnesses, and they shall prophesy a thousand two hundred and three score days, clothed in sackcloth.

    “Power” means to be supermen and computers.

    4 These are the two olive trees, and the two candlesticks standing before the God of the earth.

    Not sure what this means.

    5 And if any man will hurt them, fire proceeds out of their mouth, and devours their enemies: and if any man will hurt them, he must in this manner be killed.

    It’s great if we will have so great power that we will breathe with the fire. What will be the temperature of our bodies? It’s exciting to have a greater power than I had in the past when I was a superman.

    I have the desire to kill people who don’t send me money. It is hurting that you ignore me and my faith. “Enemies” is essentially all the world. I have no friends, only enemies. I fought with the world already. As I say in the above mentioned blog post, I did with my spiritual power 11 Sep and was going to destroy Russia completely afterwards, because Russians were my enemies.

    My girl says I am harsh, but who know what we will agree for in prayer for in the future.

    6 These have power to shut heaven, that it rain not in the days of their prophecy: and have power over waters to turn them to blood, and to smite the earth with all plagues, as often as they wish.

    I have not yet tried this. My girl apparently has not tried this too (yet).

    But once I was dying of hunger in the city Perm of Russia, in 20 meter of a food store. I saw a vision of the city under water and prophesied that it will be destroyed by a flood as a punishment of my death. I survived. The city survived too: The gateways for ships in the dam of the city’s hydro power plant were broken by a ship lost control. As I read 3 days later in a paper, 3 of 4 gateways were broken, just one remained to protect the city against the flood.

    It is interesting that the witnesses of the Apocalypse cause catastrophes by “wishing” just like fairy tale magicians.

    7 And when they shall have finished their testimony, the beast that ascends out of the bottomless pit shall make war against them, and shall overcome them, and kill them.

    As I said, in the past I had supersonic power. I was able to make very strong hits (with a supersonic speed of my hands and legs). What kind is this “beast” that he could overcome such a superman? Isn’t it an alien? What is the “bottomless pit”?

    What does “make war” mean? Does it mean that we will fight with each other by telepathically controlling Earth armies like as in a game of chess against each other?

    Am I really a witness rather than a participant of the Apocalypse if it succeeds to kill me? Well, to be dead just 3.5 days is not that bad.

    8 And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified.

    I live in Ashkelon. To move to an apartment there in Jerusalem with my girl after we marry seems a quite possible variants. Wherever there is a cheap apartment.

    9 And they of the people and kindreds and tongues and nations shall see their dead bodies three days and an half, and shall not suffer their dead bodies to be put in graves.

    Yes, people consider me like that, not even to bury me. I am hated.

    10 And they that dwell on the earth shall rejoice over them, and make merry, and shall send gifts one to another; because these two prophets tormented them that dwelled on the earth.

    An interesting note that they will send gifts. It is a good thing, as they make here a nonprofit activity rather than to serve to money as people do now.

    11 And after three days and an half the spirit of life from God entered into them, and they stood on their feet; and great fear fell on them which saw them. 12 And they heard a great voice from heaven saying to them, Come up here. And they ascended up to heaven in a cloud; and their enemies beheld them.

    Isn’t this the rapture of the church? Aren’t only two people raptured and the rest are left behind?

    Isn’t so because of:

    (Jn. 12:25) “He that loves his soul shall lose it; and he that hates his soul in this world shall keep it to life eternal.”

    You love your soul, you want them to be saved by the Gospel. But I hate my soul in the world of the Gospel, I rejected my own religion. You reject my new religion. You don’t reject yourself with your beliefs (your soul). So you may be condemned for not believing me and be left behind.

    So? Or not so?