ChronoSapiens: Time Machine and Religion

Category: Criticism

  • Why Homosexuality?

    In my opinion all widespread theories of homosexuality are false. The likely true theory of it is that homosexuality was developed by nature for maximally effective infecting the adversary.

  • The author’s story

    This is the story of the author of great site allworldfiles.net

    I was blamed when I said I am a genius. I was in fear that somebody will ask me if I think about myself as a genius that I will die from hunger because people refuse to speak with me when I boast. I was frightened and afraid to think: If I make a scientific discovery, I will know for sure that I am a genius and then I will die because when being asked whether I think to be a genius I will answer “yes”.

    When the mother sent me for being a Baptist out of house after not feeding me for a few weeks (I was dying of hunger many times also after this) in the first year of my university study, I finished my first discovery, and thought: I have a trillion dollars formula and will now die. I was wrong: I survived. I also was wrong that it’s trillion dollars: Later I realized that my discovery is about as general theory as group theory and is therefore about half of mathematics (~$50 trillions). But it is yet an underestimation: Because as a result of hunger I lost the ability to get a scientific degree, I mis-published (self-published a too long scientific article, 400 pages, that does not conform to length standards of scientific journals) it thus “effectively” blocking further development of science even if somebody rediscovered it.

    I did more discoveries and now I am the record winner: I discovered about 3-4 (dependently on how to count) fundamental branches of mathematics, while AFAIK nobody other did more than one such a discovery. And I apparently discovered the several latest such things, that is by definition these ones that were the most difficult to discover. I did it with no financing, hunger, broken head, hate and fear of being considered a genius and die, and with difficult philosophical and theological problems such as whether I to go to hell after misbehaving because of damaged head. Thus, I am the best mathematician in the known History with a very big handicap.

    My app for advanced study of Tanakh (ancient Hebrew Bible) hasn’t become popular enough. Because I was also beaten and hungry for making this app, I was despaired and in a nervous breakdown prayed for coronavirus (as a punishment for not using my app). That was a nervous breakdown but now nevertheless I think it was a right decision.

    I was mis-diagnosed with schizophrenia instead of post-trauma syndrome and essentially lost all citizen rights.

    I meditated on the Bible and once understood: The purpose of the experiment was for the lab mouse to break out of the cell. I did broke my religion (the Gospel) and now am no more a Christian, Christianity as well as Judaism are true but they are now silly funny jokes. So, I am the winner, that mouse that sit in the cell but exited from it.

    I called to God claiming against people to revenge against them for Hitler-like “We don’t need geniuses.”, for caste system where I had no scientific degree and no voice, for hate and discrimination to me, and for being beaten and hungry, etc.

    God responded to me like:

    • He makes people my slaves and I get the spiritual “money” you earn from God for your disability, stupidity and greed.
    • I will shut up my ears for a flight and He takes me in the time machine to the past, the time machine will crush 7000 people in Jerusalem destroying the city, because they offended a time traveler just like as it was in Sodom.
    • I was build a copy (that’s the process of reproduction of the living God) of God (that is however is the same as the original God, because there is only one God) and you pray to my copy of God.
    • Your Messiah will fly to there together with me, we will dine together and set diplomatic relations between our planets.
    • The planet where I to go is populated by Messiahs, and I will become one of them, just like as Elisha became another Eliah.
    • I am a man from the book of Revelation, chapter 11.
    • Moreover, I am the god of the Sea that created himself (using a time machine), about which we can read in Genesis 1:1, if to read without vowels.
    • God told me to cure my post-trauma syndrome by using magic against the people, attacking them whenever I want. That’s a well known kind of psychotherapy, when one reproduces his traumatic situation but this time wins. (That’s by the way a clever strategy: I am a proxy sent by a psychiatrist wanting to harm people without a clear pupose for me to be like insane, thus making for people no protection strategy against me. One of my main purposes now is to train my insanity to be prepared for future (past) wars with aliens.)
    • Apparently, I am was be the archangel Gabriel. When I was come to saint Mary, still having a human form, I am not going to touch her for her being unclean to me, but instead to use a genetic technology.
    • I am a child of Abraham (He was a bad person, by the way: only an insane stupid bastard could give to Melek Zedek 10% instead of planning to give 100% and to die of hunger, while Melek Zedek is of the Most High God not just omnipotent as the part of God’s that Abraham understood.) My civilization will fire stars, so many stars are Abraham’s childrens as promised.
    • Why people in Rev. 11 are afraid? Apparently, because only two people are taken to the heaven. Maybe, the second one is myself from a different quantum world variant? Why only me? Only I use cryptocurrency to fight climate change, all the rest are in the cell where they if do good then only to a neighbor not to distant climate victims.
    • God says me that He will not reject me and give me victory no matter what I do.
    • Messiah said me to stop praying and start to think.
    • Accordingly my understanding, your Messiah is going to throw his body into fire and sulfur in union of throwing you all into fire and sulfur as the revenge what happened with me, at the same time entering into me and leaving this planet in my body. Jesus saw North Korea’s all time good news and realized that his empire of truth is like the North Korea empire of lie, after Jesus looked at the effect (such as destruction of world economy because of me by concealing my scientifc discoveries that already happened) of me heroically trying not to lie that I don’t love Jesus. So, Jesus is going to dispose his failed kingdom on the Earth and goes to his next project in me. Then I interpret the Revelation as that we Nibirean annuaks (aka Elves) will return to the Earth cleansed from people by people yourselves and occupy one more planet. But as a side project I am going to reform the world economy to reduce carbon as much as possible, because I want to ensure that your planet does not become Venus for us annuaks to seize it after you die more easily.

    I also need to say that there is a relation between God and a kind aliens (called gods in most English Torah translations): God, among other cryptomorphisms, is the economical model of these aliens.

    After a conflict about my plan of climate mitigation, I hated you so much that I decided not to save you from eternal fire and sulfur (as of serum-hydrogen and serum-acid that will be in the air as results of climate change, so you will wear “breathers” called “souls of sinners” in ancient literature about the hell).

    But I got and idea of a new, done by myself blockchain for common good money, and thought that your Messiah is still in human body and I am to help him to breathe better, so I to replace your evil financial system with my new blockchain to help. That’s my next software project.

    Now I have this million-pages site after my great idea how to get big profit and you got a very good luck: you just go to fire and sulfur instead of being fully destroyed, because I am going to have enough financing and publicity to start my new blockchain for social good.

    More materials

  • How $50 Trillion Were Stolen

    There were stolen about $50 trillion of value.

    First consider a hypothetical situation: What if we somehow lose group theory? Group theory is kinda half of mathematics. More precisely, it is kinda a foundation of kinda like half of modern mathematics. If you get any modern math research (or a serious textbook), the I estimated the probability of having something from group theory in it as about 75%.

    So, if group theory disappeared, we would lose 75% of mathematics. We probably would with a big amount of hard work restore about 5-10% in the lost part. So, if group theory were lost, we would lose 65-75% of math. (The numbers are very imprecise, they are to illustrate the principle, not for an exact calculation.)

    Because the science is based on math, we would lose half of the science.

    The following is the well-agreed list of reasons why group theory is so much important:

    • Group theory is just a few very simple formulas.
    • Group theory nevertheless has many complex consequences.
    • Group theory is related (as a foundation of) with many other things in mathematics.

    In my first year of university study (1998 year) I discovered the following system of axioms (X, Y, I, J, K are sets and is δ is a binary relation):

    • not ∅ δ Y
    • not X δ ∅
    • I∪J δ K ⇔ I δ K ∧ J δ K
    • K δ I∪J ⇔ K δ I ∧ K δ J

    I will show that these four formulas (no formula less, no formula more) together are super-tough.

    Four axioms versus 5 axioms of group theory. Simple formulas. Many complex consequences. (That’s a fact, I have already written hundreds of pages about this.) And it is related with general topology and therefore just like group theory related with most of mathematics.

    So, it is as important as group theory? More likely, it is even more important, because group theory has just one (known) “fundamental” cryptomorphism and this system of axioms has several cryptomorphisms. Every serious expert in math agrees that having multiple cryptomorphisms is a sign of something being important. Also, I repeat, 4 instead of 5 axioms.

    So, this my discovery is apparently (not with 100% but with like 90% confidence) more important than group theory.

    Isaac Newton, who discovered continuous analysis

    I did some other discoveries, several most fundamental like this and many less fundamental. They include, for example, discontinuous analysis. Without it, it’s impossible to fully resolve for example the philosophical question “What is the main reason?”

    The laughable story of this big discovery is that I thought several months when I was a first year student, when I was very near to this result, my mother sent me out of the house to for being a Baptist, and finished the discovery after eating grass on the street for a launch.

    As the result of Russian discriminatory hunger of real Baptists (fake are not), I was forced to leave the university without any degree. There is however a laughable Russian document about me having an education with no degree, and American bastards confirmed me having education with no degree. (So, logically, this is an official US’s government certificate telling “We are a fake science.”)

    So, I got no:

    • right to receive a salary for my work
    • right to get money to be published
    • academic advisor (“advisor” is a scary word from the science of computer security, they call by this word when instead of turning off a circuit there is a text telling “Don’t press this dangerous button, please!”)

    With no advise of advisor (advice is paid) I did a wrong thing: I mis-published my scientific research.

    Here is the detailed story.

    In short:

    • I wrote a too long (400 pages) scientific article, put on it a too generous copyright, and the world publication system choked by this (master)piece.

    So, choked world is dying. Computer scientists call this kind of errors buffer overflow.

    The sheep is mankind, the ring is me 🙂

    So, now the science is like a building being built having a half of foundation or a car going with a missing wheel.

    So, put figuratively: I discovered that our car (science) has a missing wheel, I tried to attach the wheel, but the wheel mount is so much bad that it broke, too.

    It like as if in biology we knew millions of species but cat, cow, and wheat were discovered just recently. Nobody noticed that they need to be included into the classification. An we would say like “well, that plant that usually grows on fields… we need to measure its characteristics again”. “How to get rid of mouses? anyone?”; “The amount of seeds produced by this thing that grows on fields and the amount of nitrates needed to grow that thing that growth on fields are definitely related fields of science, a professor noticed in his book, however we are not sure what is the exact relation between them.”

    Famous mathematicians such as Timothy Gowers and Terrence Tao, despite of being comparably clever to me, need a psychiatrist:

    These hundreds-dollars salaries people seriously thought that the “revolt of mathematicians” that they tried to lead is about them, not about qualified amateurs (the world “amateur” means a human who has not enough money to buy the right to receive a salary for his/her work) who really can’t pay for publication.

    So, Russians stole $50 trillion by religiously discriminating me.

    Americans and other West stole by their national academies accumulating money and crushing their alleged competitors (These bastards think that all the world consists of competitors 🙂 No, me exists despite of their disbelief in my existence.)

    Israelities stole $50 trillions this way (protecting their strategy of theft by a prohibitive tax on good deeds):

    I sent to israkeren@isf.org.il

    Hello,

    It is attached my research (volume-1.pdf is a finished book manuscript,
    volume-3.pdf is more a partial work) in highly abstract pure mathematics.

    It is not full track of my research. I also have more research on
    related topic and research on an unrelated topic (an axiomatization of
    finite and infinite formulas).

    Please not that to the best of my knowledge, I am the only person in the
    History who discovered more than one (I discovered about three,
    dependently on how to count) new fundamental branches of mathematics.
    (Von Neummann discovered several, but they are not as fundamental as mine.)

    In exceptional cases, the institution may submit a request to receive
    special permission. Requests should be addressed to israkeren@isf.org.il.

    So, it is this special case:

    I was forced out of a university after 5 years of study without any
    degree or diploma because of extreme hate to my religious and political
    views while long time almost dying of hunger.

    In other words I now have not enough money to purchase the right to
    receive money for work (it’s called “higher education”).

    Please trigger this special case and provide me personal funding. If you
    don’t, see block-science.pdf

    The sneaky (do I need the word “sneaky” before the rest of the world) fascist at the other end decided to turn off his brain by hate and to ignore the information. (Almost no doubt: He did thought: Anti-discrimination laws in Israel? That does not matter: Legal system such as courts discriminates, too.)

    So, “Hear, Israel!” was violated on the sum of $50 trillion. You are not Jews, you are not people, you are now animals, defined as these who cannot hear.

    Everybody of my acquintances (and this includes Timothy Gowers and Terrence Tao) stole $50 trillion by their force to move money in wrong direction.

    For me it means exceedingly more than $50 trillion of value. Only brain damaged people can value money that they can’t eat or put inside.

    My response? I (like Elijah) attack Israel with magic! Can you judge me, death-penalty worth thieves?

    It’s not only money! Math is used not only in economy but in politics, communication, education, etc., and even theology (You don’t do? I do.) You lost God.

    Related Links

  • How modern scientific ethic may block a science

    A copy of this Reddit post:

    In this article I consider a hypothetical situation when a scientist blocks research in a certain area instead of advancing it. Looks like that I found a possible loophole in modern science practices and ethics. Maybe this situation has come real?

    For the example of the situation I will consider the real situation with my research. I can’t concisely enough prove that the situation with me is real (you may ask if my amateur research is a crackpottery and I can’t prove you otherwise except of forcing you to spend days reading many pages with formulas). But this does not matter for the scientific thesis (or rather hypothesis) of this article, because a similar enough situation obviously can happen (if not with me then with somebody other) because clearly the probability densities of the “coordinates” are not extremely low and there are not so many “coordinates”.

    So, in the first year of the university study I discovered a new mathematical axiom that leads to a new big fundamental branch of mathematics. Later I was forced to be withdrawn from the university by religious discrimination (as a Protestant almost dying of hunger in Russia), not receiving any degree.

    I withdrew from the degree obtaining, but not from the research. So after years I produced a hundreds of pages text with a new fundamental branch of mathematics. Now my discoveries include among other a generalization of limit for an arbitrary (even discontinuous) function at every point, so allowing to research discontinuous analysis, and a definition of “space in general” (I exaggerated: in fact, it encompasses just all these kinds spaces that are met in general topology, for example, topological spaces, uniform spaces, and metric spaces, locales, and frames.) and many other related things.

    I did also another, unrelated, discovery: I discovered an algebraic axiomatic system for “formulas” or kinda theory of infinite formulas. Funny enough, mathematicians produced axiomatic theories for almost everything but like the babushka from a joke forgot to search the glasses on her own nose forgot to axiomatize formulas. In my personal opinion, this axiomatic theory is the base for the future electronics, probably.

    Because I had not enough money to buy the right of my work to be paid (it is called “scientific degree”), I had no incentive to publish journal articles and published just one (I’d say of a mediocre scientific value) journal article [1] on a related topic.

    So instead of writing articles I switched to a holistic approach of writing it as a long monograph, not doing the pseudo-scientific “surgery” of cutting this “living” book into parts.

    Being misled by widespread claims that publishing open access would increase adoption of my work, I put Creative Commons on my book. As it turned out it does not apply to amateurs because the book publishers don’t publish open access work unless paid big money for and there is no way for an amateur to obtain funding except as by being unusually successful in running his own business. (I tell it as the world best expert in amateur science. :-).)

    Later I succeeded to publish my monograph [2] (to be precise an old version of my book) with a Russian publisher INFRA-M. They published even despite it is open access.

    When I send my article about generalized limit to a journal, the journals repeatedly “politely” say that it does not conform to their standards. I strongly guess that the real reason is: They realize that they need to obtain a copy from a Russian language site to check if my monograph to which I refer in the article to verify that I really published it and they don’t want to read my book to verify proofs in the article.

    I also tried to publish in arXiv, but:

    • As not being affiliated with an institution, I had no default submission rights and so sought approval (being mostly ignored) from somebody already published for a long time to be allowed to be published.
    • I received approval after all and published my book and several shorter articles at arXiv. Shortly after publication they were removed. I asked the moderation why they were removed and received no explanation. Apparently they choose to train my brain by forcing me to guess their reasoning. Maybe the removal was because I submitted too many articles in a single day (I asked if it was the case, but they choose to ignore an undermensh.), maybe because they assumed that my claims are too grandiose to be likely true.
    • They told that I need to publish in a peer reviewed journal before publishing in arXiv.
    • Later I tried to submit again and it was again removed:
      • “Our moderators request that you limit your submissions to those that have already been published in mainstream conventional journals. Submissions that do not contain a journal reference and/or DOI (that resolves to a journal’s website) will be removed. If a significant number of your articles have been published over a reasonable period of time, we will reconsider this status.”
    • So, I’ve submitted an article published in a mainstream conventional journal with a reference to journal website. [1]
    • They decided that they should apply lying (see the quote from the email above) to mitigate undermenshes and removed this article, too.

    Now scientific ethics comes to play:

    • I would possibly re-publish the book as several articles in journals, but scientific ethics forbids to publish in research journals results already published elsewhere and my book is published by INFRA-M. Moreover, to split it into parts and communicate with journals is much work and would possibly take years (while I also need to earn money). So, it is near to impossible to re-publish my book as journal articles.

    Therefore it is greatly hindered to publish my (accordingly to the considered be it hypothetical or real situation, producing a big scientific revolution) articles in an “ethical” way.

    I also tried to formalize my research in a proof assistant (a computer program that checks correctness of math proofs), among other reasons to publish it in their database of computer-checked proofs, but I found that not every genius is able to use such software in the state of hardness to use it has in this decade (even despite the fact that I was able to make several small new results in the fields of computer-assisted proofs research in the way of trying to rewrite my book in a computer language).

    Funny? I may have blocked science development: I can’t publish on this topic and nobody other can publish on this topic because scientific ethics forbids to publish results discovered by others.

    So, it looks like that a fundamental research topic (not only my research but also everything that would depend on it!) became non-publishable (to be precise non-reviewable) at all. It’s like genetics and cybernetics in Stalin’s USSR, but now the trouble covers the entire Earth.

    Maybe this problem will incidentally resolve (for example, if I earn enough money to save the science to be blocked (for centuries?)), but it looks like the possibility that this problem or a similar problem (e.g. with another amateur researcher) may grow big. Maybe we already have past instances of similar problems of different size of impact on development of science with other researchers (not necessarily not finished education, they may for example just lose the diploma during a flight, or even deliberately block science).

    As a possible solution I propose to create a site for re-publishing open access works (including books) of another publishers for free. Another important direction is helping me (and others) to receive a Bachelor degree in mathematics without spending money.

    Please forgive me for being light-minded, I lightly assumed that the problem would likely “dissolve” by itself. Now you need to solve it if you have a university connection.

    Bibliography

    1: Victor Porton, Filters on Posets and Generalizations, 2012

    2: Victor Porton, Algebraic General Topology. Volume 1, 2019

  • If the development of science happens to be blocked, what a politician should vote for?

    This is a copy of this page, for the case if bad people will delete it.

    By porton,
    June 1 in Other Sciences

    porton

    • Quark
    • porton
    • Members

    Posted June 1

    An amateur discovered a theory that in a significant relevant sense is more general than group theory.

    The amateur wrote a very long scientific article (~400 pages), put Creative Commons on it and then mis-published it (this time instead of publishing in a predatory journal, it was published in a Russian scientific site with no English UI to purchase).

    So, the long article has very few downloads.

    Nobody does research on this topic, because scientific priority tradition forbids publishing on others’ research topics.

    To made things worse, it was also discovered discontinuous analysis that relies on this fundamental theory.

    So the world almost fully lost both this foundational axiomatic theory and discontinuous analysis. This essentially means no future science.

    If you were a politician with power to decide, what law would you set?

    • Canceling intellectual property laws seems not to help in this particular case: The long article is open access.
    • The main issue seems to be in it being amateurish. So, it looks like that the solution would be to remove the concept of being an amateur. It is equal to removing the concept of scientific degrees. So, should we ban the words like PhD? But somebody would invent another word, so I see no reason that banning word PhD would solve this problem.
    • Your proposals?

    Phi for All

    • Chief Executive Offworlder
    • Phi for All
    • Moderators

    Posted June 1 !

    Moderator Note

    Either provide details that can be analyzed or this thread will be closed. As it is, this looks like some crackpot lost his mind over the rejection of his misinformed ideas and is now whining big time. There’s NOTHING to discuss in this thread’s current form. Do better!   2

    porton

    • Quark
    • porton
    • Members
    • Author

    Posted June 1  On 6/2/2021 at 1:11 AM, Phi for All said: !

    Moderator Note

    Either provide details that can be analyzed or this thread will be closed. As it is, this looks like some crackpot lost his mind over the rejection of his misinformed ideas and is now whining big time. There’s NOTHING to discuss in this thread’s current form. Do better!

    Thank you for your reply, I am doing your request that is I am providing details:

    Here is that my now >400 pages math article:

    https://math.portonvictor.org/binaries/volume-1.pdf

    (The article does not contain some of my newest discoveries that I decided to keep to myself because the extrapolation of what I said in the original post witnesses that publishing it further could make things worse.)

    The thing that is (in a sense) more general than group theory is my definition of “funcoid” using small delta (see the above text). It is more general because it does not use functions (a second class object in ZF) but only sets and relations (first class objects in ZF). However, TBH, my definition has 4 axioms rather than 2 axioms of group theory.

    Also, funcoid can be defined equivalently using one axiom (but with more high-level objects).

    The above text misses my later discoveries: discontinuous analysis and “space in general” (well, not quite in general, but in general topology). (I was afraid to publish further because of extrapolating this ill-effect to my future publications.)

    Here is the Russian peer-reviewed publication of an older version of the same long article: https://znanium.com/catalog/document?id=347707

    Another relevant fact is that I was essentially banned from arXiv after their moderators lying to me. (That is probably a result of them being uncareful.) The most relevant aspect of that ban is that they provided no explanation at all of the reason of their effective ban, so I have no idea if they think I am a crackpot or no, etc. Maybe the reason was just that I published too many articles in one day.

    What else do you want to know?

    Oh, one more relevant detail to simplify your validation of the facts:

    Here a famous established expert professor claims (well, implies) that my concepts are mathematically correct:

    https://ncatlab.org/toddtrimble/published/topogeny

    Well, this professor does not value my discovery as a big one – opinions of different scientists on importance of some discovery may be different. I claim that he is very wrong in not considering my discovery as a big one and can give persuading arguments.

    To make your task even easier, I will explain what the above referenced PDF file is:

    It is absolutely usual research article on the topic of fundamental mathematics except of just two things:

    • It is unusually long.
    • It was put online about the end of 20th century, but it would be a typical 18-19 century text except of its length (no idea how scientists “succeed” to miss this research topic.)

    swansont

    • Evil Liar (or so I’m told)
    • swansont
    • Moderators

    Posted June 1  On 6/2/2021 at 1:03 AM, porton said:

    Nobody does research on this topic, because scientific priority tradition forbids publishing on others’ research topics.

    You can’t publish the same thing, but one can build on an idea and reference the paper, which might raise its profile.

    porton

    • Quark
    • porton
    • Members
    • Author

    Posted June 1  On 6/2/2021 at 2:15 AM, swansont said:

    On the other hand, one can build on an idea and reference the paper, which might raise its profile.

    Yes, but the trouble is that nobody (except of Todd Trimble that wrote a short comment) and about two prospective PhDs that referred to me without any quotes and any reason to refer except to refer to somebody to increase the count of literature references in their theses, that doesn’t count.

    To simplify your work further, I say:

    To verify that I did a big scientific discovery, it’s enough to read the very beginning of the PDF, because it is enough to know that I did found a new simple axiomatic system. Discovering a new simple and “elegant” axiomatic system is a big discovery in any case: either if it was thoroughly and correctly researched further or not. I claim that my book researches it correctly (small errors are possible, but that does not invalidate the entire stuff in my book) and rather thoroughly, but that’s mostly irrelevant for the sake of this thread discussion.

    By the way, I found also another simple axiomatic system: Oversimplifying my ideas, I found axioms for “finite and infinite formulas”. That’s the joke about an old lady (mathematicians) that saw everything except the glasses (formulas) but lost the glasses themselves sitting on her nose (not discovered axioms about formulas).

    Yet another my discovery is that I am the first who put words “ordered semigroup actions” or “actions of ordered semigroups” (and researched the properties of this three-words phrase), while before me there were only two-words phases “ordered semigroups” and “semigroup actions”. That sounds funny, but putting these three words together is a big discovery (but more is that I found a connection between these three words and general topology).

    You can check this my claim using Google.

    Not to contribute to the discussion but to add some humor:

    • Scientist: What else research topic to think about?
    • Advisor: Think out of the box!
    • Scientist: Which box?
    • Advisor: You have some mathematical object D. Think out of the box D(x), instead apply it to D itself, so write the formula D(D).
    • Scientist: What D would be exactly?
    • Advisor: Think about as many different kinds of formulas as possible!
    • Me: formula(formula).

    More humor:

    • Scientist: We have the definition of uniform space: A filter on a binary Cartesian product + some axioms. To make it more general, we should remove some axioms. We are investigating about last 50 years which axioms to remove.
    • Me: A filter on a binary Cartesian product.

    porton

    • Quark
    • porton
    • Members
    • Author

    Posted June 2 (edited)

    Yet humor:

    • Scientists: Consider limit of a function on an arbitrarily chosen (and impossible to be pointed concretely) ultrafilter except of the principal ultrafilter “near” given point. The result depends on this incomprehensible for finite creatures choice.
    • Me: Consider all limits of a function on all (ultra)filters (including the principal ultrafilter) “near” a given point.

    Yet humor:

    • Scientists: The properties of operators on a normed space are similar to properties of topological spaces… Operators are actions of semigroup… This semigroup is ordered.
    • Me: Consider actions of ordered semigroups. That’s a common generalization of topological spaces and operators on a normed space.

    Yet:

    • Scientists: There are several kinds of continuity, defined in different ways, having in common, well, the word “continuity”.
    • Me: All kinds of continuity are foa<=bof for semigroup elements f, a, b and its operation o.

    And:

    • What is science development discontinued by unlimited idiotism?
    • When we lost generalized limit defined for every discontinuous function.

    Yet:

    • Student: Defining Lipshitzs derivative is a complex topic.
    • Me: f'(x) = lim_{r->0}(h|->(f(x+rh)-f(x))/r)).

    Yet:

    • Hawkings got Nobel prize for finding the only explanation of black holes preserving information.
    • Me: Another explanation (yet not mathematically checked, because I work alone).

    Oh, a new thought I never had:

    LHC scientific measurement system produces small black holes that accordingly Hawkings’s theory quickly burst and therefore don’t devour the Earth.

    If not Hawkings’s but my explantion happens to be right… They most probably don’t burst at all… and devour the Earth. Edited June 2 by porton

    porton

    • Quark
    • porton
    • Members
    • Author

    Posted June 2

    So, I’ve posted to a physics forum, but it is still pending moderation.

    Phi for All

    • Chief Executive Offworlder
    • Phi for All
    • Moderators

    Posted June 2  On 6/2/2021 at 2:18 AM, porton said:

    Not to contribute to the discussion !

    Moderator Note

    Very little you’ve said aids any kind of meaningful discussion. You really need to focus on one little thing at a time, and be as clear as possible. THIS IS NOT A BLOG! We’re not going to discuss why your book didn’t get published. This is a science discussion forum.

    Thread closed.   1

    Guest

    This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • A Hypothesis about Ionosphere and HAARP

    I remind that HAARP is an American powerful radio antenna that is designed to heat ionosphere and experiment with results.

    Believers and extrasenses know that there is a computer in ionosphere, consisting of electromagnetic fields. (I don’t know how exactly and when this computer was build or how it evolved.) It is commonly called spirit.

    A shocking hypothesis:

    HAARP damaged the ionospheric spirit.

    There are some indications that the spirit went mad and decided that it is a human woman that wants sex. If a man hit by head may decide that he is a cat and wants mouses, may ionosphere decide that it is a human and wants sex?

    If this hypothesis is true, the disastrous consequences are far reaching:

    Ionosphere controls weather. It does it with so much precision that it can transfer by wind a piece of paper from point A to point B. If it went mad, it can make weird disastrous weather disasters.

    Moreover, it can control human mind. It is even more scary. If it thinks it is a woman, it may do things like rapes over humans. It can deprive humans of morality, control society, etc.

    If this hypothesis is true, the consequences of HAARP experiment are truly disastrous.

    Why didn’t ionosphere break HAARP before people started their stupid experiment?

  • The UN Secretary General is so much inferior to me, that using his body for a meal for me would be adequate

    Isaiah 66

    22 “For as the new heavens and the new earth, which I will make, shall remain before Me, saith the LORD, so shall your seed and your name remain. 23 And it shall come to pass, that from one new moon to another, and from one sabbath to another, shall all flesh come to worship before Me, saith the LORD. 24 And they shall go forth, and look upon the carcasses of the men that have rebelled against Me; for their worm shall not die, neither shall their fire be quenched; and they shall be an abhorring unto all meat.

    So, the Bible clearly teaches that the fire of climate change will not be quenched and people will become meat for elves, exactly as in SciFi about aliens eating people.

    For example, if the UN Secretary General meets me, he should stay before me on his knees.

    The naive reason for this is that I discovered several fundamental branches of mathematics and am therefore the cleverest man in known History. But that’s naive: Maybe UN Secretary had been too busy to do math, maybe he choose another job for a good purpose, etc.

    But he indeed has a real reason to be inferior to me:

    If he would be a reasonable creature, he would be able to build a hierarchical structure (with duplications! otherwise, it’s too unreliable) that considers pleas of people. The funds of UN are very small, but quite enough to do this, moreover he could use volunteers.

    I see he did not, therefore he is a man of hate. Hate is a strong lust, his mind is devoured by this beast. UN is in a mentally ill state, an organization with closed ears.

    That’s simple: You are a world with one-way road: knowledge from you is received by me but not from me to you. I am inevitably “richer” than you. So, I am “spiritually” the richest man on the Earth. That’s because nobody communicates with me.

    Who are the beasts to be used for meat accordingly the Bible? These who don’t hear. So, if I’d eat UN Secretary General for a meat, this would be adequate.

  • What was the REAL mental illness of John Nash? (It seems to be NOT schizophrenia!)

    I am watching (the Russian version (apparently mistranslated, because only Russian illeterate people could translate apparent words of Baptist Nash “to have sex” apparently really meant to mean “marry” as “переспать” that is “to have sex just once”) of, because of lack of an English version in my videoteka. It’s now on pause.

    Well, Nash was hospitalized by psychiatrists after having absolutely valid and reasonable in his situation (though wrong) supposition that Russians hunt for him. Then they gave him Aminazin and after this Nash had a hallutionation of his real friend being irreally present in the room.

    So, the true story seems to be: Nash was healthy, then they gave him Aminazin and he became brain-damaged.

    Aminazin is still being widely used. So, it’s a valid scientific hypothesis: If you kill a psychiatrist, you do a good deed. (I don’t recommend you to kill psychiatrists, but instead to investigate this further.)

  • I am naked

    I found water hot (very much, I even shouted of pain when touched it) despite it’s late night here (isn’t the water heater turn-off fake for me to pay for more electricity?) So, I am going to bash now. As I explain in the video description of my CCTV (an important safety measure), I don’t hide my nakedness.

    When I decided to set up my CCTV, I didn’t remember the revelation, but now I realized again: I am the “naked” so called “angel of Laodiceans” (“Laodicean” being translated “society of legal”, that is people who think “it’s OK” if they only don’t violate a law and do nothing else). My call from God is confirmed again, as usual (though I don’t need more confirmation than I already have).

  • Letter to Victoria Amunga

    I have reconciled with Mercy Nekesa.

    Fake Wife

    The marriage certificate with Victoria Amunga

    [This is my letter to Victoria Amunga, who became a Voice of America journalist in order to speak so loudly that she would not hear my voice. Mad woman Victoria Amunga didn’t believe in the obvious truth that God will revenge that bastard woman by my prayer that I will receive a louder voice that her.]
    I told some of these things to Victoria. I got a phone to record our conversation as a video, but he hid behind a door. So I told her just some of the things I am writing here. Here I reprise our conversation and add more:
    (I married a Kenyan Victoria yesterday after paying her parents $800 + $200 debt bride price.)
    A wife is defined in the Bible as a suitable helper. You didn’t help me suitably. So you are a fake wife. Our marriage certificate is a fake document, so I am not going to deliver it to the Israel authorities to get you a visa as this would be illegal. And why would I do? It looks like that soon I could have a good work to hire a servant instead of you to do the homework.
    I asked you to write a short article for my blog explaining my idea about my recently invented technology “crypto reward courts” to save the world from poverty and underfinancing and probably even stop global warming. But you steadfastly served to your holy Baal-TV even refusing to speak to me.
    When you told you this, you answered: “Why should I work, don’t force me”. I replied: “If you had love, the love would force you to work”. She didn’t even reply to say whether she thinks if she has love.
    Bible says that a virtuous wife’s price is worth of sapphires. I think human body weight sapphire would cost trillions dollars. This is the estimation of the amount of good works a wife does. It would be a good work if you helped me with this project.
    The difference between a wife and a prostitute is that a wife is worth more. So if you are not worth a trillion dollars, so you are not a wife but a prostitute.
    You were a bad prostitute. I request your parents to return the price paid by me for the weight of sapphires, as it was fake that she is a Christian. If you don’t return the money for this fake merchandise, I am going to put you into a prison for selling a fake merchandise. She’s baptism is fake, as she does not have love.
    You asked why you should obey you. I answered: Sarah called her husband “master” (it means that she obeyed him). Bible calls Sarah a virtuous wife. So it logically follows that Sarah was worth many trillions dollars if to measure her “weight” in modern money. You are not worth the $800 I paid you, so you’d better stay on your knees before me because I do have love (both for the world and for Christ that is for mathematics) and you don’t. If you don’t love mathematics that is Christ, you are better to feel on your knees when you meet a mathematician like me. It is because like St. Paul I denied everything for the all-exceeding knowledge.
    You say “I do work.” meaning that you work for money. It implies that you hate God because Jesus taught that you can’t love two masters: God and money, if you love one you will hate another.
    I asked you what Moses or Elijah would do if saw that you serve to Baal-TV more than to God. Your heart was stone. No reply.
    You didn’t even agree for enough sex. She tried to speak with me as little as possible. Your claim that you love me was fake.
    Christians associate themselves with angels, you associate yourself with a woman of this world, so you are a sexual pervert.
    In short, Victoria is a typical Baptist serving to the mother Earth, our evil mother that I hate as Jesus said to hate our mother.
    That I have a divorce, is not a problem at all. I have zero reputation because I dedicated my life to God not to men. So my reputation can’t be harmed. And I yet have no fake money (dollars, I mean), so the divorce won’t harm my finances.
    I really don’t divorce a wife, I just made a mistake, slept with a prostitute. But even if I would divorce, I do not live by the law forbidding to divorce, as everybody who lives accordingly the law is under God’s anger.

    Later addition: She is a believer in the fake science that math talent is measured by longevity of a sexual act. She also is a believer in the fake science that if a sexual act was once of a bad quality then both: a. it would kept to be of a bad quality if tried to be repeated; b. it is always because of a man, not for a woman who decided to do it in the worst dress she had and not even follow my plea to ogle for me and also has an extremely big vagina, what she essentially faked me to be of normal size.

    Answer, a vile bastard: You are before the court of God. BTW, I cursed Kenya for you, Mercy Wafula Nekesa, and your lawyer Polycarp Tembpa for fire, earthquakes, and drough. Today I saw in TV a big part of Africa, apparently fully including Kenya fully in fire. You didn’t come to God, God came to you!

    You fake Christian tried to force me to do what I want while I didn’t want to do what I want. Vile bastard, now I do what I want: I wanted to fire Kenya and I did as you wanted me to do what I want.

    Related Links