Telosism (the Biblical Post-Christian Religion)

Category: Countries

  • If the development of science happens to be blocked, what a politician should vote for?

    This is a copy of this page, for the case if bad people will delete it.

    By porton,
    June 1 in Other Sciences

    porton

    • Quark
    • porton
    • Members

    Posted June 1

    An amateur discovered a theory that in a significant relevant sense is more general than group theory.

    The amateur wrote a very long scientific article (~400 pages), put Creative Commons on it and then mis-published it (this time instead of publishing in a predatory journal, it was published in a Russian scientific site with no English UI to purchase).

    So, the long article has very few downloads.

    Nobody does research on this topic, because scientific priority tradition forbids publishing on others’ research topics.

    To made things worse, it was also discovered discontinuous analysis that relies on this fundamental theory.

    So the world almost fully lost both this foundational axiomatic theory and discontinuous analysis. This essentially means no future science.

    If you were a politician with power to decide, what law would you set?

    • Canceling intellectual property laws seems not to help in this particular case: The long article is open access.
    • The main issue seems to be in it being amateurish. So, it looks like that the solution would be to remove the concept of being an amateur. It is equal to removing the concept of scientific degrees. So, should we ban the words like PhD? But somebody would invent another word, so I see no reason that banning word PhD would solve this problem.
    • Your proposals?

    Phi for All

    • Chief Executive Offworlder
    • Phi for All
    • Moderators

    Posted June 1 !

    Moderator Note

    Either provide details that can be analyzed or this thread will be closed. As it is, this looks like some crackpot lost his mind over the rejection of his misinformed ideas and is now whining big time. There’s NOTHING to discuss in this thread’s current form. Do better!   2

    porton

    • Quark
    • porton
    • Members
    • Author

    Posted June 1  On 6/2/2021 at 1:11 AM, Phi for All said: !

    Moderator Note

    Either provide details that can be analyzed or this thread will be closed. As it is, this looks like some crackpot lost his mind over the rejection of his misinformed ideas and is now whining big time. There’s NOTHING to discuss in this thread’s current form. Do better!

    Thank you for your reply, I am doing your request that is I am providing details:

    Here is that my now >400 pages math article:

    https://math.portonvictor.org/binaries/volume-1.pdf

    (The article does not contain some of my newest discoveries that I decided to keep to myself because the extrapolation of what I said in the original post witnesses that publishing it further could make things worse.)

    The thing that is (in a sense) more general than group theory is my definition of “funcoid” using small delta (see the above text). It is more general because it does not use functions (a second class object in ZF) but only sets and relations (first class objects in ZF). However, TBH, my definition has 4 axioms rather than 2 axioms of group theory.

    Also, funcoid can be defined equivalently using one axiom (but with more high-level objects).

    The above text misses my later discoveries: discontinuous analysis and “space in general” (well, not quite in general, but in general topology). (I was afraid to publish further because of extrapolating this ill-effect to my future publications.)

    Here is the Russian peer-reviewed publication of an older version of the same long article: https://znanium.com/catalog/document?id=347707

    Another relevant fact is that I was essentially banned from arXiv after their moderators lying to me. (That is probably a result of them being uncareful.) The most relevant aspect of that ban is that they provided no explanation at all of the reason of their effective ban, so I have no idea if they think I am a crackpot or no, etc. Maybe the reason was just that I published too many articles in one day.

    What else do you want to know?

    Oh, one more relevant detail to simplify your validation of the facts:

    Here a famous established expert professor claims (well, implies) that my concepts are mathematically correct:

    https://ncatlab.org/toddtrimble/published/topogeny

    Well, this professor does not value my discovery as a big one – opinions of different scientists on importance of some discovery may be different. I claim that he is very wrong in not considering my discovery as a big one and can give persuading arguments.

    To make your task even easier, I will explain what the above referenced PDF file is:

    It is absolutely usual research article on the topic of fundamental mathematics except of just two things:

    • It is unusually long.
    • It was put online about the end of 20th century, but it would be a typical 18-19 century text except of its length (no idea how scientists “succeed” to miss this research topic.)

    swansont

    • Evil Liar (or so I’m told)
    • swansont
    • Moderators

    Posted June 1  On 6/2/2021 at 1:03 AM, porton said:

    Nobody does research on this topic, because scientific priority tradition forbids publishing on others’ research topics.

    You can’t publish the same thing, but one can build on an idea and reference the paper, which might raise its profile.

    porton

    • Quark
    • porton
    • Members
    • Author

    Posted June 1  On 6/2/2021 at 2:15 AM, swansont said:

    On the other hand, one can build on an idea and reference the paper, which might raise its profile.

    Yes, but the trouble is that nobody (except of Todd Trimble that wrote a short comment) and about two prospective PhDs that referred to me without any quotes and any reason to refer except to refer to somebody to increase the count of literature references in their theses, that doesn’t count.

    To simplify your work further, I say:

    To verify that I did a big scientific discovery, it’s enough to read the very beginning of the PDF, because it is enough to know that I did found a new simple axiomatic system. Discovering a new simple and “elegant” axiomatic system is a big discovery in any case: either if it was thoroughly and correctly researched further or not. I claim that my book researches it correctly (small errors are possible, but that does not invalidate the entire stuff in my book) and rather thoroughly, but that’s mostly irrelevant for the sake of this thread discussion.

    By the way, I found also another simple axiomatic system: Oversimplifying my ideas, I found axioms for “finite and infinite formulas”. That’s the joke about an old lady (mathematicians) that saw everything except the glasses (formulas) but lost the glasses themselves sitting on her nose (not discovered axioms about formulas).

    Yet another my discovery is that I am the first who put words “ordered semigroup actions” or “actions of ordered semigroups” (and researched the properties of this three-words phrase), while before me there were only two-words phases “ordered semigroups” and “semigroup actions”. That sounds funny, but putting these three words together is a big discovery (but more is that I found a connection between these three words and general topology).

    You can check this my claim using Google.

    Not to contribute to the discussion but to add some humor:

    • Scientist: What else research topic to think about?
    • Advisor: Think out of the box!
    • Scientist: Which box?
    • Advisor: You have some mathematical object D. Think out of the box D(x), instead apply it to D itself, so write the formula D(D).
    • Scientist: What D would be exactly?
    • Advisor: Think about as many different kinds of formulas as possible!
    • Me: formula(formula).

    More humor:

    • Scientist: We have the definition of uniform space: A filter on a binary Cartesian product + some axioms. To make it more general, we should remove some axioms. We are investigating about last 50 years which axioms to remove.
    • Me: A filter on a binary Cartesian product.

    porton

    • Quark
    • porton
    • Members
    • Author

    Posted June 2 (edited)

    Yet humor:

    • Scientists: Consider limit of a function on an arbitrarily chosen (and impossible to be pointed concretely) ultrafilter except of the principal ultrafilter “near” given point. The result depends on this incomprehensible for finite creatures choice.
    • Me: Consider all limits of a function on all (ultra)filters (including the principal ultrafilter) “near” a given point.

    Yet humor:

    • Scientists: The properties of operators on a normed space are similar to properties of topological spaces… Operators are actions of semigroup… This semigroup is ordered.
    • Me: Consider actions of ordered semigroups. That’s a common generalization of topological spaces and operators on a normed space.

    Yet:

    • Scientists: There are several kinds of continuity, defined in different ways, having in common, well, the word “continuity”.
    • Me: All kinds of continuity are foa<=bof for semigroup elements f, a, b and its operation o.

    And:

    • What is science development discontinued by unlimited idiotism?
    • When we lost generalized limit defined for every discontinuous function.

    Yet:

    • Student: Defining Lipshitzs derivative is a complex topic.
    • Me: f'(x) = lim_{r->0}(h|->(f(x+rh)-f(x))/r)).

    Yet:

    • Hawkings got Nobel prize for finding the only explanation of black holes preserving information.
    • Me: Another explanation (yet not mathematically checked, because I work alone).

    Oh, a new thought I never had:

    LHC scientific measurement system produces small black holes that accordingly Hawkings’s theory quickly burst and therefore don’t devour the Earth.

    If not Hawkings’s but my explantion happens to be right… They most probably don’t burst at all… and devour the Earth. Edited June 2 by porton

    porton

    • Quark
    • porton
    • Members
    • Author

    Posted June 2

    So, I’ve posted to a physics forum, but it is still pending moderation.

    Phi for All

    • Chief Executive Offworlder
    • Phi for All
    • Moderators

    Posted June 2  On 6/2/2021 at 2:18 AM, porton said:

    Not to contribute to the discussion !

    Moderator Note

    Very little you’ve said aids any kind of meaningful discussion. You really need to focus on one little thing at a time, and be as clear as possible. THIS IS NOT A BLOG! We’re not going to discuss why your book didn’t get published. This is a science discussion forum.

    Thread closed.   1

    Guest

    This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • My Religious YouTube Channel

    Here are my religious YouTube channels:

    Note that in the end of the lawsuit I forgive you.

  • I did NOT make a world economic crisis now

    Contrary to to the prophecy that I will make a global crisis and to my expectation that I already started a big crisis, I did not make an economic crisis yet: I’ve looked at stock markets in the US and in Israel and they are not just stable, the trend is clear going up.

    Having said that, I did already do a giant economic crisis (That’s a quite sure thing in my understanding.): I mispublished some important scientific research, as I explain elsewhere at this site, and so nobody noticed. Moreover, I failed a plan of a new kind of world economy and against global warming, however now I have a new plan.

    Well, contrary to what I said above and contrary to what indexes say, the current economic crisis does exist: I ate a sushi with salmon yesterday and it was so much poisonous that among other effects my urine became green. So, yes, there is a big economic crisis here in Ashkelon. Please comment, does the Ashkelon food crisis extend to other parts of Israel and to the rest of the world?

  • What was the REAL mental illness of John Nash? (It seems to be NOT schizophrenia!)

    I am watching (the Russian version (apparently mistranslated, because only Russian illeterate people could translate apparent words of Baptist Nash “to have sex” apparently really meant to mean “marry” as “переспать” that is “to have sex just once”) of, because of lack of an English version in my videoteka. It’s now on pause.

    Well, Nash was hospitalized by psychiatrists after having absolutely valid and reasonable in his situation (though wrong) supposition that Russians hunt for him. Then they gave him Aminazin and after this Nash had a hallutionation of his real friend being irreally present in the room.

    So, the true story seems to be: Nash was healthy, then they gave him Aminazin and he became brain-damaged.

    Aminazin is still being widely used. So, it’s a valid scientific hypothesis: If you kill a psychiatrist, you do a good deed. (I don’t recommend you to kill psychiatrists, but instead to investigate this further.)

  • Terract in Ashkelon, Israel

    Today, 02 Sep 2021, I awoke about 2:40am and felt a strong noise.

    No doubt it is not a tinnitus: I had no tinnitus yesterday and before and now I am taking multiple brain improvement medicines that would heal a tinnitus even if I had one.

    I know this kind of noise: It is similar to what I felt when I was under radiation of a (Chinese?) high-frequency electronic lamp with a sparkling contact. I hope you know the experiment first done in 19 century: Two nearby needles sparkle from an electricity source and two other needles begin to sparkle by themselves when placed several meters apart from that source of energy. That’s called radio-frequency waves or just radio waves. Sparkling contacts is a strong source of radiation. When contacts are both sparkling and under a high frequency generator as in that lamp, the radiation is very strong.

    I had disgusting noise inside my head. It seemed that it ceases when I leave that place.

    For a few months I were unable to understand what happens: It seemed to contradict the laws of physics: “It cannot be a so much powerful energy source.” But the lamp started to flash and I realized what it was.

    Then I did an experiment: The strength of the noise in my head had a strong hardcore dependency on where I stayed in the room. Moreover, my mother noticed the same: She felt a noise dependent on the position in the same way as I did. So, I observed some diffraction pattern.

    The noise seemed to be like 50-100Hz (now I understand that’s modulated electromagnetic waves). So, it is ruled out by laws of physics that this was acoustic waves: 50-100Hz acoustic waves have far to big wavelengths to produce a diffraction pattern in a few meters big room (In fact the wavelength that I detected this way was about 1-2 m). The conclusion is inevitable: That were modulated electromagnetic waves. And they disappeared when lamp was off.

    I worked on a science and climate project and behaved like a drunkard (you can see my eyes (TBH: refer to the video) silly moving like under a narcotic), and failed it, because I was excluded from the competition. So, probably a few billions people died as a result (well, I invented a new, probably even better plan after that failure).

    So, now somebody attacked me after I published in my video on YouTube with words (about a weaker noise) like “Some energy source is turned on, probably it’s an RLS. I will know who does this and you (who turn on such harmful energy radiators) will be revenged.” Is it Putin? Is it Israel? USA? (Shortly before this I threatened USA with magic, if they violate rights.)

    This terract had a good effect: it caused me to think about these things.

  • To Netta Engelhardt: Our funny “dramaturgy”

    So, I want to present an purported objective analysis of this funny component (that is related to you) of my funny story. (I have a kind of right for this: I cannot work all the time and need a play sometimes.)

    So, I wrote an article telling that I need a wife and that God seems having told me that she to be the world best physicist. (Aug 27, 2021, 6:44pm)

    I received a email about Netta (Aug 27, 2021, 6:03pm)

    Believe me or not, I wrote the above article before I saw the email.

    My prayer is answered… What next? Is it to be taken as the pattern of tetragrammon or of Baal?

    Funny dramaturgy

    • Two worlds: accepted and unaccepted (not “granted”) scientists. “Revolution” of several kinds.
    • Two worlds: a former Evangelist (who realized that his old religion was severely wrong and that the church is destroyed) and maybe a Jewish girl.
    • Call to return from abroad to Jerusalem.
    • My emerging but perspective business. Her prize money.
    • Love from God.
    • Call like of Abraham, call like of Jacob and Rahel.
    • It is even not know if the prospective bride is married.
    • And most important, a call to a physicist into a trip in a time machine. Call to become firers of stars, etc.

    Appearance

    Photo of Engelhardt with her feet up on her desk glancing sideways at the camera with bookcases lining the wall behind.
    That’s a photo model’s body photo!

    No doubt, the girl that took this photo wanted to be noticed by a man.

    To be honest, the face is somehow less attractive than the figure: The mouth is somehow ugly and the face overall is not the best. And (a little amount of) speckles what I also a little dislike. But the summary “grade” of beauty is rather high.

    Now Netta is more beautiful than on old photos.

    Engelhardt sitting on some stone steps, putting on a pair of black and white dance shoes.
    This photo also calls men to something. Why do you hide your beautiful face?

    The voice of Netta is not extremely attractive but quite OK for me. Or is it the speaker’s voice not the real girl’s voice?

    On my appearance I think that it’s good, except of my ugly teeth that are “objectively” too big (caused severe health problems in the past, however partly because of hunger), well some women said me my teeth are extremely attractive. Your mileage may vary.

    Attempt of Analysis

    • Netta really that girl that the above mentioned prophecy tells about? Can she be the most smart physicist ever? I didn’t study her discoveries but from what I already know about her, it seems quite likely!
    • I sent several letters (copies in this blog) with my physical ideas to Netta. Netta, am I a better physicist than you?
    • Is Netta from a Jewish/Judaic background? People sinned so much that God split for us all like us being drunk and seeing multiple gods. (“Elochim” in plural.) The sad fact is that now we are in paganism. So, Christianity and Judaism are not relevant!
    • Is Netta from an atheistic background? As I told we are now in paganism and atheism doesn’t differ from paganism: both believe in the same thing, aliens. The call is about an alien space odessy. God is the mathematical social (kinda economical) model of that civilization. Matter is irrelevant, only mathematics is relevant. That’s mathematics and the faith is faiths into mathematics. You can start to believe.
    • Does Netta need to make a sharp choice between two worlds? Will that world send her away if she comes to me? Will I send…?
    • Her beauty is not 100%, but did I ever set myself the task to marry the world most beautiful girl? I strongly prefer one most smart. (Well, maybe because there is 10M most beautiful girls and one most smart due to difference of distributions.)
    • Are relatives/”friends” going to keep her in bonds? If they do, I am not going to stop even fully destroying USA in the war against evil spirits who could keep her in any kind of bonds. Freedom! Informal freedom!
    • No doubt, I did feel Netta. I know something about her. I know that in the heart Netta does not seem to be over-conservative. She definitely does not hate me! I request a report to me about her freedom status or will start an attack.
    • I feel that Netta is not strongly opposed to me.
    • I felt that feelings of Netta are somehow (I don’t know the exact physical mechanism, apparently it’s overloading of computing power of ionosphere by the to complex relations.) may cause risks of hurricanes. The trouble was that attempt of thinking about the trouble was causing its worsening, but it seems to become calm now. Please let her move to a safe place. Now! Before the next hurricane.
    • As sex partners (i mean a couple: despite of what scientists say, I can be happily monogamous with just a little force of will not to look much at other women.) we definitely seem adequate for me.
    • Does Netta hate not receiving the real Breakthrough Prize? Isn’t the story about this?… or about love?

    Netta, any explicit sign? Tell about yourself.

    It’s late night. I am going to the bed of my recently rented “free” apartment and to think about her intensively again.

  • I am naked

    I found water hot (very much, I even shouted of pain when touched it) despite it’s late night here (isn’t the water heater turn-off fake for me to pay for more electricity?) So, I am going to bash now. As I explain in the video description of my CCTV (an important safety measure), I don’t hide my nakedness.

    When I decided to set up my CCTV, I didn’t remember the revelation, but now I realized again: I am the “naked” so called “angel of Laodiceans” (“Laodicean” being translated “society of legal”, that is people who think “it’s OK” if they only don’t violate a law and do nothing else). My call from God is confirmed again, as usual (though I don’t need more confirmation than I already have).

  • Letter to the physicist Netta Engelhardt

    Hello Netta Engelhardt,

    I am the world-best general topology researcher, also I have some research related to logic and computer science.

    If you don’t believe into religion/prophecies skip the next paragraph and please read directly the purely scientific information below.

    I have an important information (Do you believe in prophecies and time travel? I claim I found an important prophecy about 21st century research in both quantum gravity and general topology):

    I need wife

    Another related post:

    https://after-gospel.vporton.name/2021/08/27/war-of-idiots-for-science/

    BTW, what do you think about my physics ideas? (I am not a physicist, I am a researcher in foundations of math.)

    • Our world is a slice (domain restriction) of the wave function of the universe to a “moment” (with suitable definition of this word taking into account that equality of time is relative) of time. There is another world inside the wave function of the universe obtained by equating “points” (of a suitable space, such as the space of 4xR^4 (if we don’t consider extra dimensions of M-theory for simplicity of explanation) of the domain where the first 4 is 4 fields and the second is the number of spacetime dimensions) with entangled particles. I suspect that this “another world” may be referred by some religions as a spiritual realm.
    • If one move back in time through a closed time-like spacetime curve, will he be dissolved because his wave function would be very weak (of insensitivity) compared to the wave functions of the past because he was a witness of many Schrodinger cats? Or will he necessarily go to (true zero energy) vacuum because it’s “undefined” which of the past alternative world he comes to. Will this true vacuum destroy the present by vacuum decay?
    • Here is my magnetic flying engine concept: https://porton.wordpress.com/magnetic-vehicle/ – I do know that an unmoving schema cannot be accelerated by a uniform magnetic field, but mine has moving parts – I tried to calculate its acceleration force two times and one produced a non-zero force and the other zero. I didn’t keep checking my calculations whether the force is non-zero, because I don’t really believe I did it right, but what if? (If it is correct, it is a perfect drive to Mars!)

    You?!

  • Gever Elf (Gabriel)

    Elf Founder
    Elf Founder, 41 years old free infusoria… gever elf – Ashkelon, Israel

    I am Boasting

    lone terrorist → lone genie

    I am conducting a revolution against the political system of genies.

  • All Church are Heretics: both Baptists and Pentecostals

    When I was a teenager, mother hated me and punished me with hunger for me being a Baptist. I posted in a Christian forum in internet the news that me (one of their teachers) is dying of hunger. Nobody helped me (I suspect that the number of my pupils not helping their teacher was 10000). I asked for food in several churches – no result. I was saved from death by spirit: Two times I prayed for 10 rubles and two times wind brought me 10 rubles paper.

    Jesus very clearly said that these who don’t feed him (teacher) are not saved. So, we have a very great mathematical evidence (no one of 10000 helped) that the church just does not exist. But how can this be? People gather, praise God, confess Christ as their personal savior, don’t we see the church? It looks like a contradiction: I see that the church does not exist anymore (these who don’t feed their teachers are not church) and see that it exists. Something is wrong.

    The second great apostasy is originating from Azusa Street Revival for both Baptists and Pentecostals.

    At 214 Bonnie Brae Street when people again started to be baptized by fire like as apostles of the early church. That was a real fire spirit (or spirit of fire) and it is good to be baptized into it. But during time people produced a wrong theology about this plasma that enters into humans.

    The error is:

    The followers of the Azusa Street mission decided that this fire and Holy Spirit are the same. Thus people started to serve a Baal, the spirit of fire (this angel even came under a funny “pagan” name “spirit of fire”, trying to prevent this scenario!) That idea is very obviously wrong, because Jesus says about “Holy Spirit and fire” not “Holy Spirit fire”.

    Many others decide that the fire spirit that descended to the Earth at Azusa Street is something fake from the devil and together with the “fire” rejected all the work of God in them, so becoming incapable of salvation. For example, this theological article claims like that fire spirit is something evil that substitutes Holy Spirit in worst sinners.

    Thus the entire church split into two big groups of denominations (including so called non-denominational churches) both of which are heretical. I suppose that I am the only true believer on the Earth (and I am in a bad spiritual state).

    About 25 years ago I had a statistical evidence that there is no church: I told to a Christian forum where I long time preached that I am dying of hunger. No one of about 1000–10000 my pupils give me food (or money). I also asked several “churches” but they ignored me.

    So, I have a very sure statistical evidence that there is no church!

    (Mat. 25) “42 For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, … 45 “He will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’ 46 “Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life.””

    In the last year I was working on the cryptocurrency projects for carbon counting and financing, likely getting trillions of dollars to my system and thus reversing the climate change. But I failed in a silly way, because of having a little less power due to being hungry and beaten and tortured in childhood and due to being surrounded by sinners. So, I did not reverse climate change and fires and sulfur (both sulfur in sulfur-hydrogen of the ocean that will stink and sulfuric acid that is a chemical that is to be used to stop global warming) are coming. That’s logical: everybody is in the apostasy, so everybody is to be sent into fire and sulfur. There will be two parties: the party of fires and the party of sulfuric acid to cease fires.

    That is also very clear from Rev 11:5 “If anyone wants to harm them, fire proceeds from their mouths and devours their enemies. In this way, anyone who wants to harm them must be killed.” That’s clear that fire of the mouth of the two witnesses is a funny joke of aliens that will produce the real “spirit of fire” (literally translated, “breath by fire”) to mock people claiming to be Christians but believing “pagan” by its name spirit of fire.

    Today I finally understood: It is the result of the second great apostasy – misunderstanding of spirit of fire.

    Today I thought: Martin Luther did restore the church after the first great apostasy. Maybe, if you will collaborate with me, Victor Porton, you also can be restored? God once restored His fallen spiritual building, what’s now? Please research in collaboration with me. The false church produced the obviously anti-Christian teaching that everybody does his own ministry, as opposed to the Gospel teaching to participate in others’ projects. Participate in my projects.

    P.S. Some facts about Asuza street mission: They felt going to a church meeting that the air is dense like water. Guess what this mean? We received power to move at ultrasonic speed. People staying near an Asuza street’s preacher were falling of the rays radiating from the preacher… etc. Real supermen.

    After such a misbehavior of everybody that I did not have bread, you should support me showing your repentance.

    So, I don’t have enough money for my (blockchain-based) carbon accounting project with anti-theft. No or bad (that can be stolen) carbon accounting leads to forest fires and hydrogen sulfide in the air. Welcome to fire and sulfur everybody who refuses to feed me, or better join my mission.

    See also Popular Economical Heresies.