Ad: How to get to the highest heaven

Blog

  • Unfair advantage for mankind

    Because you are a cunt, you don’t send me money. So it would be better for the mankind that I would be a thief to compensate this your failure because this way I would have more money for such things as math research or writing free software, what is much more important than a small harm (like death of a thieved old woman of hunger) I would cause by stealing.

    So, it would be better if I were a thief?

    Today I’ve just realized a reasonable reason why not.

    In the human business, there is the concept of unfair competitive advantage: If one helps a business like a charity, it is not considered a good deed because it harms its competitors (whether the business is highly successful or not).

    I think the same applies to humankind as a whole: If I would unfairly help mankind, it is not a good deed, apparently (because it would probably harm aliens, as despite human civilization is not successful, Bible prophecied a great future for it).

    You should work in a charity, not do something else. You should help in a fair way. This is what I consider good before God.

  • A shocking theological theory about word of God

    We assume that “word of God” means “Bible”. Is this a founded statement?

    I propose an alternative theory: “word of God” means in Bible any mathematics (anything what is absolutely true). So, “2+4=4” or “The lattice of funcoids is isomorphic to the lattice of filters on the lattice of finite unions of Cartesian products.” would be also to be called “word of God”.

    I used a computer program to search all occurrences of the phrase “word of God” in the Bible. I found no occurrence which I would have a significant trouble to substitute this phrase with the word “mathematics”.

    Do the same, search for all occurrences of the phrase “word of God” in the Bible and try to substitute this phrase with mathematics. It is striking to consider this substitution for every particular of the found verses.

    This theological theory is shocking, because it overthrows our understanding that word of God is just the Bible.

    Well, Bible is a word of God, the Bible is mathematics. We know that somehow (we don’t know how) the Bible is the entire structure of all mathematics, “full word of God”.

    This would mean that we in some sense heavily over-relied on Bible. We know that Bible is true. But if to be a word of God means just to be mathematics, then it appears that we had no reason to assume as we assumed that Bible applies to every life situation. Mathematics is always true but a piece of mathematics does not apply to every particular life situation. We repeatedly misapplied the Bible. It was because we assumed that the word of God is personal. Mathematics is not “personal”, that is when we hear some mathematics we have no reason to assume that it is a word personally to us.

    Consider this Bible fragment translated in an unusual way. I applied it to myself and behave in a very silly way. If it is just mathematics, not a word of God personally to me, it becomes apparent.

    Christ is the word of God. He is mathematics. That is Christ is the entire mathematics. Everything that began to be, began to be through Him that is through mathematics. Read my book.

  • Apocalypse: a possible scenery

    In this blog post I will consider a theological scenery possible in my opinion.

    It differs of the traditional theological theory that two witnesses of the Apocalypse are Ilia and Enoch, born again to die. But what if the traditional interpretation is somehow wrong? It is not mathematics, in theology there is a place for errors and misunderstandings.

    The following is possible in my opinion, I am in no way sure that it will really happen this way.

    As my previous blog post says, I invented a new religion: The New Testament is terminated just like as it terminated Old Testament, because New Testament terminates itself.

    So I am not more a slave of God (I was a slave of God in the age of New Testament.) and thus the Apocalypse does not apply to me, because the Apocalypse is addressed to slaves of God (Rev. 1:1).

    So if I live in the age of Apocalypse, but Apocalypse does not apply to me, who am I? I am a witness rather than a participant of the Apocalypse. Thus am I not a witness of the Apocalypse?

    There are currently two followers of my new religion: me and my girl. There are no any other followers as I know from the fact that nobody sent me money: if a person believed me, he would send me money. So there are currently two witnesses of the Apocalypse.

    It remains to receive power and start to prophecy 1260 days and nights without an interruption. (This is called “the contact with the humankind.”) I already once had power like this already. I was transformed into a superman and computer for about a month. Maybe God will do it with me (and my girl) again? Well now I am not particularly spiritually strong I am not clothed in sackcloth like the two witnesses should be. (But in the past I behaved this way: For example, once I felt in love to an unbelieving stupid girl and to force myself not to marry her, I got ten iron sticks and pierced my body with them to feel pain and forget this silly love. I need power from God to receive the force of will again, because now I even eat to much chocolate, etc. I may need to feel pain from sackcloth to preserve in power.)

    OK, the verses of the Apocalypse:

    1 And there was given me a reed like to a rod: and the angel stood, saying, Rise, and measure the temple of God, and the altar, and them that worship therein. 2 But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not; for it is given to the Gentiles: and the holy city shall they tread under foot forty and two months.

    The temple is our new religion. The Gentiles are these who don’t believe us, including the evangelical churches.

    3 And I will give power to my two witnesses, and they shall prophesy a thousand two hundred and three score days, clothed in sackcloth.

    “Power” means to be supermen and computers.

    4 These are the two olive trees, and the two candlesticks standing before the God of the earth.

    Not sure what this means.

    5 And if any man will hurt them, fire proceeds out of their mouth, and devours their enemies: and if any man will hurt them, he must in this manner be killed.

    It’s great if we will have so great power that we will breathe with the fire. What will be the temperature of our bodies? It’s exciting to have a greater power than I had in the past when I was a superman.

    I have the desire to kill people who don’t send me money. It is hurting that you ignore me and my faith. “Enemies” is essentially all the world. I have no friends, only enemies. I fought with the world already. As I say in the above mentioned blog post, I did with my spiritual power 11 Sep and was going to destroy Russia completely afterwards, because Russians were my enemies.

    My girl says I am harsh, but who know what we will agree for in prayer for in the future.

    6 These have power to shut heaven, that it rain not in the days of their prophecy: and have power over waters to turn them to blood, and to smite the earth with all plagues, as often as they wish.

    I have not yet tried this. My girl apparently has not tried this too (yet).

    But once I was dying of hunger in the city Perm of Russia, in 20 meter of a food store. I saw a vision of the city under water and prophesied that it will be destroyed by a flood as a punishment of my death. I survived. The city survived too: The gateways for ships in the dam of the city’s hydro power plant were broken by a ship lost control. As I read 3 days later in a paper, 3 of 4 gateways were broken, just one remained to protect the city against the flood.

    It is interesting that the witnesses of the Apocalypse cause catastrophes by “wishing” just like fairy tale magicians.

    7 And when they shall have finished their testimony, the beast that ascends out of the bottomless pit shall make war against them, and shall overcome them, and kill them.

    As I said, in the past I had supersonic power. I was able to make very strong hits (with a supersonic speed of my hands and legs). What kind is this “beast” that he could overcome such a superman? Isn’t it an alien? What is the “bottomless pit”?

    What does “make war” mean? Does it mean that we will fight with each other by telepathically controlling Earth armies like as in a game of chess against each other?

    Am I really a witness rather than a participant of the Apocalypse if it succeeds to kill me? Well, to be dead just 3.5 days is not that bad.

    8 And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified.

    I live in Ashkelon. To move to an apartment there in Jerusalem with my girl after we marry seems a quite possible variants. Wherever there is a cheap apartment.

    9 And they of the people and kindreds and tongues and nations shall see their dead bodies three days and an half, and shall not suffer their dead bodies to be put in graves.

    Yes, people consider me like that, not even to bury me. I am hated.

    10 And they that dwell on the earth shall rejoice over them, and make merry, and shall send gifts one to another; because these two prophets tormented them that dwelled on the earth.

    An interesting note that they will send gifts. It is a good thing, as they make here a nonprofit activity rather than to serve to money as people do now.

    11 And after three days and an half the spirit of life from God entered into them, and they stood on their feet; and great fear fell on them which saw them. 12 And they heard a great voice from heaven saying to them, Come up here. And they ascended up to heaven in a cloud; and their enemies beheld them.

    Isn’t this the rapture of the church? Aren’t only two people raptured and the rest are left behind?

    Isn’t so because of:

    (Jn. 12:25) “He that loves his soul shall lose it; and he that hates his soul in this world shall keep it to life eternal.”

    You love your soul, you want them to be saved by the Gospel. But I hate my soul in the world of the Gospel, I rejected my own religion. You reject my new religion. You don’t reject yourself with your beliefs (your soul). So you may be condemned for not believing me and be left behind.

    So? Or not so?

  • Appeal to a court against yourself

    Letter to the President of the Russian Federation:

    When a person commits a crime and is executed, his liver also dies. This is because the liver is not a subject, it is only a part of the organism, it is condemned along with the whole organism, and not as an independent subject. If the whole society commits a crime, every member of society deserves a condemnation? According to the teachings of the Bible, he is not condemned with society, if he is a subject, and the subject differs from a non-subject in that he can be independently represented in court:

    (1Cor. 11:31-32) 31 For if we had judged ourselves, we would not be judged. 32 But when we are judged, we are punished by the Lord, so as not to be condemned with the world.

    The criterion of subjectivity, according to the Bible, is the ability to appeal to a court against oneself.

    If the liver of a criminal could sue herself, then it would not have sued for a serious crime, but only for not being able to stop the criminal.

    The people of the Russian Federation committed a violation of the Constitution: https://portonrus.files.wordpress.com/2019/06/discrimination.doc & https://portonrus.files.wordpress.com/2019/07/discrimination2.doc

    Specific proposal: I propose that the President of the Russian Federation sue the citizen Putin Vladimir Vladimirovich for improper performance of official duties. In connection with the offense against him against the Constitution of the Russian Federation, a citizen of the Russian Federation, Porton Victor Lvovich, does not have the means to represent him in court on an application for compensation for the said offense. Thus, Putin did not ensure his constitutional duty of the guarantor of the Constitution, in other words, the Constitution is ignored. The issue is important as it concerns breakthrough research and other innovations.

    This is an important choice: the President either does not sue himself, in which case Putin is part of a system that ignores the Constitution and human rights, and deserves moral condemnation; or sues himself, in which case Putin renounced evil. This is a political decision: to continue to be part of the system or a defender of human rights. If the decision is not made now, then, as my experience shows, the situation may begin to become infinitely more complicated, make the choice as later it may be too late. Putin, make a decision.

  • Supermen in Bible in beyond

    There were at least the following supermen during the history of mankind:

    • Adam and Eve (for some period of time)
    • Samson (partially)
    • Jesus
    • Paul (for some period of time)
    • myself (for some period of time)

    There will be also two witnesses of the Apocalypse.

    Supermen is so strong that can flap a hand at a supersonic speed. More importantly, the brain of a supermen works as a computer.

    Adam and Eve

    The brain of modern people is bad. That Adam and Eve were computers is clear from (Gen. 1:31) “God saw all he made and behold very good. And it was evening and it was morning of the sixth day.” Now the brain of people are bad. So it was better before.

    Also: (Gen. 2:1) “And was perfect the heaven and the Earth and all their army.” People were perfect. Without vowels it can be translated even as: “And was perfect the heaven and the Earth and their army was calculating.”

    Genesis 2:9 seems to teach that “the tree of knowledge of good and bad” injected knowledge into the human brain of how this brain itself functions (what it counts good and what counts bad). This knowledge allowed the brain to trick itself effectively causing a short-circuit. This is somehow similar to giving a program the password for complete control of the computer, this way a program becomes able to destroy the normal functionality of the computer (as well as to destroy itself). More specifically, the brain starts to work for what it makes up to feel better instead of the proper purpose, thus being deceived by the pleasure or distress.

    Gen. 2:25 without vowels: “And both Adam and his wife were talented and were not ashamed each other.” They were not only naked but also talented. Men feel below the level they had, as is clear from a without-vowels translation of Gen. 1:26: “He [man] will descent to the level of fishes of the Ocean, and birds of the sky, and beasts of the entire Earth, and all reptiles creeping on the Earth.”

    Genesis 2:16 says that the man will die in the day he eats from the tree of knowledge of good and bad. But Adam hasn’t died that day physically. I assume that “dying” here should be understood as “hanging the operating system of the brain”.

    (Gen. 3:7) “The eyes of them both opened…” (after the fall). This means that before the fall eyes only of one of them were opened simultaneously, because they had like a WiFi connection (telepathy) and Adam saw with Eve’s eyes or vice versa.

    Samson

    We know from the Bible that Samson was very strong.

    We also can know that iron swords were not able to damage his skin because otherwise Philistines could kill him while he slept. Apparently he was also not igniting by burning resin which Philistines otherwise could use against him while he is asleep.

    Samson was able to catch 300 foxes (Jud. 15:4). So he was very quickly running and fast.

    Samson was a “partial superman”. It seems he had only strength. It seems that Samson never was a computer.

    Jesus

    Jesus is a special superman. He is also an incarnation of God, accordingly the Gospel.

    That Jesus had super-strength at least during a part of his life is clear from (Luk. 4:14) “And Jesus returned in the power of the Spirit into Galilee.”

    A prophesy about his crucification:

    (Is. 50) “6 I gave my back to the smiters, and my cheeks to them that plucked off the hair: I hid not my face from shame and spitting. 7 For the Lord GOD will help me; therefore shall I not be confounded: therefore have I set my face like a flint, and I know that I shall not be ashamed.”

    Jesus kept his face hard as flint during the crucification. He allowed to pierce his hands and legs (by making them less hard), but if they tried to beat him by the face, they would damage their hands.

    Paul

    (1Cor. 4) “19 But I will come to you shortly, if the Lord will, and will know, not the speech of them which are puffed up, but the power. 20 For the kingdom of God is not in word, but in power. 21 What will you? shall I come to you with a rod, or in love, and in the spirit of meekness?”

    This means that Paul alone was able to overcome the entire Corinth (about 90 thousands people) with just a rod.

    (2Cor. 11:25) “thrice I suffered shipwreck, a night and a day I have been in the deep”. He delayed his breath for about 24 hours.

    (2Cor. 12) “3 And I knew such a man, (whether in the body, or out of the body, I cannot tell: God knows;) 4 How that he was caught up into paradise, and heard unspeakable words, which it is not lawful for a man to utter. 5 Of such an one will I glory: yet of myself I will not glory, but in my infirmities. 6 For though I would desire to glory, I shall not be a fool; for I will say the truth: but now I forbear, lest any man should think of me above that which he sees me to be, or that he hears of me. 7 And lest I should be exalted above measure through the abundance of the revelations, there was given to me a thorn in the flesh, the messenger of Satan to buffet me, lest I should be exalted above measure.”

    Paul says that he had power in the past (he calls himself “such an one”, as though it would be a different man, because with the power he also lost excellence of character and became different and become a “fool” like us now) but lost it. He was in contact with the heaven and possessed telepathy (“heard unspeakable words”). Probably saying “caught up into paradise”, Paul meant that his life here on the Earth was like paradise because a superman does not need much to live: no need for a soft bed, for good weather, etc. He has “abundance of the revelations” that is great knowledge of science because he was a computer.

    Myself

    I was transformed into a sinless superman during about one month.

    Read this wonderful story:

    We as Future supermen

    (Joel 2) “9 They shall run to and fro in the city; they shall run on the wall, they shall climb up on the houses; they shall enter in at the windows like a thief. 10 The earth shall quake before them; the heavens shall tremble… 11 And the LORD shall utter his voice before his army: for his camp is very great: for he is strong that executes his word: for the day of the LORD is great and very terrible; and who can abide it?”

    This is about the day of the Lord that is the second come of Christ. The army is us. We will walk on the walls, we won’t be damaged by acute things. This way we will occupy the Earth.

    Everybody will be a superman in the Millennium.

    Power in weakness

    (2Cor. 12:9) “And he said to me, My grace is sufficient for you: for my strength is made perfect in weakness. Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest on me.”

    When I was transforming into a supermen, I was initially very sick. Sometimes I was one second unable to raise 2 kg and the next second able to raise a car with one hand, then weak again.

    Links

     

  • Humility

    The most lagged behind civilization, whose brains are infected by a virus, cannot even to calculate in mind. Humankind. Why God has chosen this civilization over angels? ((Heb. 2) “5 For to the angels has he not put in subjection the world to come, whereof we speak. 6 But one in a certain place testified, saying, What is man, that you are mindful of him? or the son of man that you visit him? 7 You made him a little lower than the angels; you crowned him with glory and honor, and did set him over the works of your hands: 8 You have put all things in subjection under his feet. For in that he put all in subjection under him, he left nothing that is not put under him…”)

    The following are aspects of the answer:

    If a computer program is set to accomplish a wrong task, the only thing (except of broken computer) that can stop it is if it uses up all the memory of the computer and is terminated by the operating system.

    Even if the program knows that it does a wrong thing, it may keep going. As an example, I kept trying to live accordingly the letter of the law of the Gospel despite Gospel itself says that to live accordingly letter and law is wrong. I knew that to follow the letter of Gospel is wrong but kept going (see my book). Only complete lack of resources stopped me.

    The less computing power (I mean first memory) a computer has, the faster it will do the right thing, terminate the wrong program. Yes, the less memory a computer has, the faster it may work in certain situations.

    I think, this is the very essence of humility. God has chosen brain damaged people with broken memory over aliens with computer brains.

    But it is hard to self-impose humility on ourselves: (Col. 2:18) “Let no man beguile you of your reward in a voluntary humility and worshipping of angels, intruding into those things which he has not seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind”. But Jesus Christ indeed succeeded in this very difficult task: (Phil. 2) “7 But made himself of no reputation, and took on him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: 8 And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient to death, even the death of the cross.” – “He humbled himself”. How it is difficult to humble myself!

    (2Cor. 12) “9 And he said to me, My grace is sufficient for you: for my strength is made perfect in weakness. Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest on me. 10 Therefore I take pleasure in infirmities, in reproaches, in necessities, in persecutions, in distresses for Christ’s sake: for when I am weak, then am I strong.” We develop when we are in weakness, sickness, stupidity, etc.

    I think God uses every chance for our development (because He loves) us. But sometimes the best way to develop looks like a meaningless fall. Weakness however is not the purpose, the purpose is development.

    The second aspect of humility is that humble are offended. (Ps. 103:6) “The Lord makes righteousness and judgment to all who are offended,” (Psalm 146:7) “makes the judgment to the offended, giving bread to the hungry. The Lord permits the prisoners.” The idea is that the Lord will judge back with a recompense to the offended.

  • Should we be honest before God?

    Suppose for example the CEO of Google or UN secretary general or American President was careless and gave a promise to break the world economy in a certain way. I don’t know if the CEO of Google is a Christian, but suppose he is for the sake of the discussion.

    Should he follow his promise to break the world economy, accordingly the teaching of Bible?

    (Mat. 5) “33 Again, you have heard that it has been said by them of old time, You shall not forswear yourself, but shall perform to the Lord your oaths: 34 But I say to you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven; for it is God’s throne: 35 Nor by the earth; for it is his footstool: neither by Jerusalem; for it is the city of the great King. 36 Neither shall you swear by your head, because you can not make one hair white or black. 37 But let your communication be, Yes, yes; No, no: for whatever is more than these comes of evil.”

    “Shall perform to the Lord your oaths” is Old Testament! What does the New Testament teaches?

    (Rom. 12) “17 Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men. 18 If it be possible, as much as lies in you, live peaceably with all men.”

    It seems that the Gospel teaches to be honest before men not before God! A literal interpretation of this seems to mean that you should be honest if you dishonesty would harm and be disagreed upon by at least one man (if it is “peaceful” to all).

    If the UN secretary general would promise to break the world, it would mean harm to all and no man having the right to claim that it was a dishonest behavior toward him.

    We were taught to be honest by the Bible. But it seems that Bible does not require absolute honesty even if that would harm all men. So I see no reason to be absolutely honest, but instead to “live peaceably with all men”.

    Also:

    (2Cor. 4:2) “But have renounced the hidden things of dishonesty, not walking in craftiness, nor handling the word of God deceitfully; but by manifestation of the truth commending ourselves to every man’s conscience in the sight of God.”

    (2Cor. 8:21) “Providing (doing good to others) for honest (= good, virtuous, fair) things, not merely in the sight of the Lord, but also in the sight of men.”

  • Non-profit and non-pleasure

    Love is the same word as charity in Greek. But charity in modern language is very near to “nonprofit” (=NGO). So love is nonprofit. What is common between love and nonprofit: It is as hard to honestly fit nonprofit registration purpose as hard to truly love. So nonprofit and love are essentially the same. Nonprofit is the external manifestation of love, to act not for money. But  pleasure is money inside us. (Money is a measure of good and pleasure is, too.) So inside us love is “non-pleasure” like non-profit? Does it mean that we like nonprofit not for money but to have as much money as possible (“nonprofits can have profit” is a common legal idiom) to be not for pleasure but to have as much pleasure as possible?

  • I advise you to be killed by Antichrist

    (Rev. 12) “9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceives the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. 10 And I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, Now is come salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ: for the accuser of our brothers is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night. 11 And they have overcome him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their souls to the death. 12 Therefore rejoice, you heavens, and you that dwell in them. Woe to the inhabitants of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down to you, having great wrath, because he knows that he has but a short time.”

    Isn’t it a stupid decision not to accept 666 to not be killed by the Antichrist in order to resist him in his kingdom? After all our salvation does not depend on our deeds, so we cannot be cast to the hell because of putting 666 on our mortal body.

    But if we act accordingly the faith, we may choose to kill ourselves by rejecting 666. The reasons in my opinion are as follows:

    • The kingdom of the devil is coming. A man cannot resist the devil. (He deceives the whole world, not “tries to deceive”, he can deceive everyone in the world.) When the devil will be on the Earth he could simply control our brains and make us to do everything he wishes. It’s better to die than to start serve him with entire heart. There are certain spiritual mysteries in us, we are better to hide them by dying.
    • True believers love God rather than our own souls. We don’t want to do good to ourselves or save our souls (verse 11). If we don’t want this, then there is no reason to live, it is easy to agree to be killed. The time of salvation is out and we won’t be able to do on the Earth anything for the heavens. (It is like English “have overcome him” wht means that the war is finished, no more reason to live.) If we can do nothing, then there is no reason to live anymore. It is not said “hated their souls to the death” but “not loved their souls to the death”, this is passive indifference not active choice.
  • Which of the two variants will be in the heaven?

    Bible clearly teaches that in the heaven there will be no such problems as hunger.

    But why?

    I think, there are two variants:

    1. The development in the future will be never stalled for advanced periods.
    2. The development will sometimes almost fully stall making the life locally useless, but the citizens of the heaven will not consider their uselessness during such periods as a reason to ignore “mundane” problems like possible hunger.

    Please discuss which of the two variants (or both?) will be accomplished.