Blog

Christ in us is a dream (“hope” in most Bible translations) of glory (Col. 1:27). Christ lives in us as “something” and this something, it is nothing but a dream of glory. So the meaning of life in achieving glory, that is, hype on the heavenly Internet. Heavenly Internet is called Christ. Christ is the light of the world (John 8:12; 9:5; 12:46), that is, the electromagnetic radiation of the universe. Thus, all the electromagnetic radiation of the universe is a carrier of information, the cosmic Internet. But the glory of God is almost the same as Christ. Christ is mathematics: (John 1:1-3) “1 In the beginning was mathematics, and mathematics was with God, and mathematics was God. 2 It was in the beginning with God. 3 All through it began to be, and without it nothing began to be, that began to be.” That is, we are talking about the dream of mathematics, the dream of studying and realizing it. Christ is the most important thing in us, which means that this is the main purpose of life. We will endlessly travel like electromagnetic waves on the Internet space, looking for hype, that is tough mathematics.

So, the most important thing in us is the dream of fame.

(Rom. 8:24-25) “24 For we are saved in hope. Hope, when he sees, is not hope; for if anyone sees, then what shall he hope for? 25 But when we hope for that which we do not see, then we wait in patience.”

“We are saved in hope” means that our salvation consists of a dream just as a table can consist of wood. That is, our dreams will go to heaven. But I’m not about this now. When a person with a dream of glory already sees glory, this is no longer a dream, and therefore it is not Christ in us. Christ in us is only a dream of glory that is not yet visible.

So, our task is to give an opportunity to become famous, to those who dream but still do not see an opportunity to become famous.

For example, I have (among other things) the following three topics for PR (really cool news, by the way) for which I collect money:

•  Press release of a world news (living Google) (about how the Google’s big computer suddenly came to life and tried to make contact with people)
• Press release a world news to journalists (a missionary sold A mission to the devil) (how missionary sold the mission to the devil)
• Press release a world news to journalists (maddest fundraiser ever)
• Press release a world news to journalists (real superman) (a human was during a month a superman with computer brain)
• as well as advertising this blog

But I have no money at the moment to make these press releases.

I write about this well I understand that most of you do not care before Christ in me or in someone else. But you should care, you have to fulfill the dream of glory.

Bible says to have love. But “love” can also be translated from Greek as “charity” that is NGO (non-governmental organization) in modern language.

Isn’t the author of this blog post too radical? Isn’t love something great and NGO just a common thing?

Not quite so. It may be a very hard task to register an NGO following all rules and procedures without a formal violation of a law.

For example, the author faced the following problem: He wanted to do good but didn’t well understand how to do good. For example, he wanted to get profit to register an NGO, then he would like to get money from the project to register another NGO to do more good, etc. Needless to say, I was unable to invent how to fill the official documents on this topic. It turned be as hard as to fulfill the Gospel.

If you don’t have an NGO, your life is useless. Dot. (I don’t mean that the project necessary needs to be officially registered.) So says Bible:

(1Cor. 13) 1 Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal. 2 And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries, and all knowledge; and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing. 3 And though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and though I give my body to be burned, and have not charity, it profits me nothing.

It was nearly about me: I prayed tongues, had the gift of prophecy, understood many mysteries and am a great mathematician, I had great faith, following the letter of Bible especially thoroughly and fanatically, and produced real wonders. I did math research to profit people in a trillion dollars. I was not burned, but suffered hunger, beating, etc.

It “profited me nothing”: I was unable to do neither commerce nor charity. Having no good opportunities of a job, I almost died from hunger.

Later God taught me something (read my blog and books) and now I have NGOs (not yet officially registered though).

Want to start working for a charity? For a start consider this list of projects. It was very hard for me because of being a religious fanatic. But for you it can be much easier, just take today the decision to start work or donate for a nonprofit project today.

(1Cor. 13:13) “And now stays faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.”

(1Cor. 14:1) “Follow after charity, and desire spiritual gifts…”

(1Cor. 16:14) “Let all your things be done with charity.”

(Gal. 5:13) “For, brothers, you have been called to liberty; only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another.”

(Col. 3:14) “And above all these things put on charity, which is the bond of perfection.”

(1Th. 3:12) “And the Lord make you to increase and abound in love one toward another, and toward all men, even as we do toward you”

(1Pet. 4:8) “And above all things have fervent charity among yourselves…”

(1Jn. 4:7) “… for love is of God…”

By the way God is an NGO (1Jn. 4:16).

So the brothers and everyone else betrayed me.

Like Joseph from the Bible, it did more good than harm. My torment and offences led to the fact that (after torment, hunger, offences, blows by a frying pan to my head, huge losses for me and for many others) I corrected an important theological mistake (and this is much better than becoming a prime minister), because I was forced to a narrow path, being driven by other people to extremes.

So the people have fulfilled God’s will.

And, weidly enough, they did it on purpose so that I could correct the error, and not just like stupid puppets. There is nothing to blame them for: by large, they acted correctly and wisely.

Some of the arguments of the “clergy” (for example, Bishop Eduard Grabovenko) are understandable: they wanted God to experience the young minister by suffering. But to implement this “plan” there is only one way: to offend, betray, commit violations of the laws, stand in the battle on the same side as Satan. If we reformulate the arguments of the “churchmen”, what it is: the one who has more money (the “senior minister”) should cause damage to the one who has less money (the “junior minister”). Where this “principle” comes from is well understood – these are the principles of the US Republican Party (do not think that I am for the Democratic Party). It became a church doctrine, because many preachers are American Republicans.

Speaking of Republicans: I think their main principle is that if a person is poor, then he deserved it, it means that the rich should humiliate the poor so that they become even poorer. (At the place of Donald Trump, I would adopt an official resolution “we don’t anymore follow this principle, convicted in following this principle will be excluded from the party”.)

If someone has at least some intelligence, after reading this my sermon, he will never do that again. You did this to correct my mistake – a good deed, but a mistake can be fixed only once. That is why I called this sermon the “principle of the second time”. It is all the same, as if Joseph’s brothers, having learned that they had “made” him prime minister, would again betray their comrades saying “such is God’s will.” In other words, you will no longer pass the junior minister to the devil in order to “test” him: the test has already been passed and the error has already been corrected. Moreover, the younger brother can become a blogger and declare your sin to the whole world.

By the way, why did God have the clergy establish their “control” over all? It’s like a stretched thread, which, if overdone, breaks completely and will not be stretched anymore. So I came out completely out of control: why stay under control, if control prevents you from doing something useful. It is reasonable to come out of control. The control was established by God in order for me to go out from under it.

And what would I do in the place of Bishop Edward? I would leave the post if necessary (or maybe I would not leave), because anyway, someone else could take this post and join me. One of the reasons: God intercedes for the offended, and he seriously offended me in the past. Better not go against God. Has not God exalted you for this day?

And how exactly did Edward do his deed? After the blows with a frying pan, I can’t remember exactly (maybe specifically so that Edward could not be judged by an ordinary criminal court), but as I remember, he violated the signed contract by which I could preach in a certain church building, and using physical force forced me out of this building, as a result of which I lost my salary and almost died of starvation. Or was it not? Can’t remember exactly. Maybe he did it somehow differently, but the insult took place.

The theological theory I will propose now sounds as a heresy or an “unholy” thing. In fact, I am not sure if it is really supported by the Bible, however surely there is some evidence for it which I will present now.

The idea is the following: The problem of relations between Christ and the Church is mathematically equivalent to the problem of relations between the husband and the wife. Something like to try all poses (not poses, they seem to be already tried, but to try all feelings more likely).

(Eph. 5:23) “For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the savior of the body.” The problem of control over the wife (especially in sex) is equivalent to the problem of salvation of the church.

(Eph. 5) 21 Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God. 22 Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands, as to the Lord. 23 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the savior of the body. 24 Therefore as the church is subject to Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing. 25 Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it; 26 That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word, 27 That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish. 28 So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loves his wife loves himself. 29 For no man ever yet hated his own flesh; but nourishes and cherishes it, even as the Lord the church: 30 For we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones. 31 For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined to his wife, and they two shall be one flesh. 32 This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church. 33 Nevertheless let every one of you in particular so love his wife even as himself; and the wife see that she reverence her husband.

The first thing (21) is to submit each ones feelings to one another. It is to feel pleasure as a mean to please the another. The woman should feel pleasure as a way to satisfy his husband’s desire to please the woman (and vice versa). (22) continues this thought especially for women. The problem of woman feeling pleasure to satisfy her husband is mathematically equivalent to the problem of submitting to the Lord. (23) The husband controls the pleasure of the wife and this is mathematically equivalent to control of Christ over the church. This is the formula of salvation in the material world (“body”). (24) Need to try all ways to subject wives to husbands (especially in sex). It is mathematically equivalent to the Church being subject to Christ. (25) Husbands should do sex to the wives, this is mathematically equivalent to love of Christ to the Church and His sacrifice for the Church. (26) Talk about sex with your wives. (28) may perhaps be interpreted that a loving husband to do masturbation: a woman worth love definitely sometimes may be too busy, he may do this thinking about the wife. But masturbation makes no sense, one may say. It makes some sense: To load the organism for possibly better health, to train for sex, to make pleasure to the wife through telepathic link. One may say that it is a wrong way of doing things, but we are in the process of  transition to the future Kingdom which will be different than the original creation, and in transitions sometimes silly things happen. I’d advice to avoid ejaculation during masturbation to allow for more sex with the wife (except if she is in a travel). (28) seems to say that a husband should feel in sex like as he feels in masturbation, it may mean to do it just a physiology but use this physiology to think about the woman and enjoy her. Whether you do masturbation or not “He that loves his wife loves himself.”, this means that if one loves his wife then he receives pleasure from the process of pleasing the wife, from the pleasure of the wife itself, not just from his physiology. Only a man who wishes good for himself (not suicidal) can truly love his wife. (29) seems to say that penis is to be trained for better sex. (32) speaks about a mystery that is a hard mathematical problem or a cipher, the problem to be solved is about Christ and the Church, the marital relations are a mean of its solution. (33) says that participating in solving this angels’ mathematical problem is for everyone of us. (33) seems to again reference that sex with the wife is to be modeled after masturbation. How to interpret “the wife see that she reverence her husband”? The Strong’s Greek dictionary translates “reverence” also as “(passively) to be alarmed” , doesn’t it mean something like to be excited “passively”?

By the way the above explains a reason why sexual magic sometimes works.

I am yet unmarried. After my weird sexual adventure I decided (see the comment from the page of the last link) to find a girl to marry. I want my wife to believe me, read my writings, and know mathematics.

I have a couple of scientific research projects worth a trillion (or at least hundreds of billions) dollars.

Naturally, I decided that I would not do small good deeds, but would concentrate on scientific research and other large projects.

An unexpected problem arose: People began to consider me greedy and did not want to do business with me and this was one of the reasons for my poverty, which greatly hindered my research.

In addition, Christian preachers taught me to give money to others and to the church in order (miraculously) to get it back.

I decided that I should start sharing with others (and how could it be different, if otherwise I am a beggar?)

So, I became a real “advanced” preacher of prosperity, like many American churches.

But there is one problem: If I do good for money (even if I receive them miraculously, as it sometimes happened, for example, I prayed a couple of times to get 10 rubles and brought them by the wind), then I am a real servant of Mammon or Baal.

Now I understand: There was a point to distract from my megaprojects and start doing good deeds, but the whole point was only to save me from greed so that if I became, for example, a billionaire, I would not use my opportunities to harm.

It’s impossible to stop serving Baal / Mammon as long as we live “by the law,” according to the rules, “by the letter”. This is the only way to get rid of greed.

It is necessary at once to abandon our entire system of rules. This system of rules for us was the Gospel.

The Gospel itself denies that we should live by the book:

(2Cor. 3:6) “He gave us the ability to be servants of the New Testament, not letters, but the spirit, because the letter kills, but the spirit gives life.” I realized that this meant that I should stop following the letter of the New Testament just as we stopped to follow the Torah.

Thus, we now have a new religion, free from the basic problems of the old, such as greed. Drop everything and start reading my books and blogs.

When studying the Bible, I was guided by the principle that I should apply it personally to myself. It was a wrong principle.

Once I asked God what would happen to my city, Perm (Russia), and I found a few words in the Pentateuch of Moses with the letters PRM (this is the name of the city written in modern Hebrew). I began to read the Old Testament without vowels, because initially Moses and other prophets wrote without vowels (Jews added vowels only in the Middle Ages).

I translated the first fragment: (Leviticus 10) “Moses said: You will not be in Perm and you will not die … but your brothers all the house of Israel will cry for the seraph, who is the seraph of the Lord. Do not go out of the doors of the church tent, lest you die, because the oil of anointing (Christ) of the Lord is upon you. They did as Moses said,” etc. I decided that it was I who was the “anointed one”, because no one except me wanted to learn Hebrew and this message could only be addressed to me.

After a more detailed analysis of the text, which I omit, I came to the conclusion that I would be a missionary in Africa, live in a tent and preach in a large church tent. I am immortal, that is, I am guaranteed to live until the Second Coming and I will never die. I am an “anointed one” (like a king or a prophet) and in me there is a seraph (spirit of fire). I will become very rich, famous and will lead to repentance a lot of people. Everything will be done as Moses said.

The following fragment (Leviticus 13) with the letters PRM convinced me that I would not be in Perm, that I would “cry unclean! unclean!”, that is, declare people their sins (using psychoanalysis) and live separately outside the “camp” (not in the city).

Continuing to look for PRM, I found: (Leviticus 21) “The great priest of his brothers, on whose head the Anointing oil was poured, and who was consecrated to put on his clothes, should not bare his head and would not be in Perm … He should not touch, he should not be defiled by his father and his mother … And he should not depart from the church and dishonor the church of God, because the consecration with the oil of the anointing (Christ) of God is upon him. I am the Lord. In the wife he must take a mother-virgin …”

I am a great missionary, I thought, so “great priest” is about me. I decided that my parents were zombies and began to try not to touch my father and mother and not to make electrical contact with them at all in order not to be defiled (my mother touched me stubbornly, once I threatened her with an ax so that she would stop touching me: anyway they are zombies, I thought).

About mother-virgin, I first decided that I would marry a cloned girl and did not even think about St. Mary. Someone convinced me that I should marry St. Mary.

I quarreled on a religious matter with a company of young Pentecostal Charismatics. They became very angry. It was absolutely clear that they want to kill me. I began to run away, but I got a deadend.

That time I still had strength, like Samson, and I could cope with the company that attacked me, but I decided (I don’t know correctly or just chickened out, it doesn’t matter now) that if I start fighting, the whole city, a million people would raise against me (they would not understand who attacked whom) and I would not cope.

I decided to give up. I decided: If they break my head, then what will I be for a priest? There will be more harm than good from me.

But I thought that I could not not to become a priest and a missionary, because God told me that. Then I “invented”: I said to the devil: I will be the priest of St. Mary instead of the priest of God, if you do not beat me/kill me.

A team of the guys from the church came running, but there was not a trace of anger on their faces, the devil completed his part of the deal.

As befits a pagan priest, I began to engage in astral sex, as described below.

Then, in an unusual way, I translated from the Greek a fragment of the Gospel about the three women standing near the cross of Jesus. See here and further here. From this very interesting translation, I came to the conclusion that I should have sex with St. Mary and called her spirit. She flew in the form of a cloud and I did not recognize her, and fought against her with cosmic energy. Then at first we just flew together in the spirit (turning into clouds), then she flew under me and I shed rain on her. She really liked it and from that day we began to engage in astral sex in full. She asked me to start doing also masturbation and I began to do it.

I came to the conclusion that the spirit of Maria is on the daughter of Russian President Maria Putin and I should marry her. I either imagined her in various poses, or flew with her in the atmosphere or in space. What came of it to read here. (I expected that our unaccepted love would lead to a nuclear war).

All this nonsense ended with the fact that I realized that the era of the Church and the Gospel was coming to an end and The gospel cancels itself, just as it canceled the Old Testament.

Since the law of the gospel is no longer valid, then the deal with the devil is not valid. (Heb. 7:12) “Because with the change of the priesthood, there must be a change in a law.”

After that, I started a normal life. Now I am looking for a wife on a Christian dating site. I want her to believe me and know mathematics.

Of course, you can say that, probably, the prophecy did not come true, because I sold it to the devil. But if the prophecy may not come true because of me, what is the point of applying it to yourself?

We were deceived: we were told: there is a body and there is a soul, there is a material world and there is a spiritual one, there are psychological problems and there is a sin.

First of all, this is simply unscientific: science has proven that a person thinks with the brain.

So there is no soul?

No, there is a soul, but it seems that what is called a soul in the Gospel is just radio waves of the brain. Then everything falls into place: Man thinks with his brain, but he has an eternal soul and he can live forever.

And Christ is the electromagnetic radiation of the Universe. It is also “material” (although this may depend on what someone has in mind when they talk about materiality). But at the same time Christ and mathematical abstraction. The same object can be a material and mathematical abstraction. Read more in my book New Testament Commentary by a Mathematician, the chapter “Christ and God”.

This means that we must take material things seriously. A person can go crazy if his brain breaks. Or, if he does not go crazy completely, his character can deteriorate. How can you neglect your health and material well-being? Moreover, how can you not help the poor and the sick? Personally, I want to be a billionaire so that I can help others.