The science academia of the world failed making itself dependent on big greedy publishers like Elsevier, America dependent on for example poor Russians doing scientific research for them, poors with no money to publish but exclusive right to publish, so being able even one poor man to fail the entire world economy by a tiny mistake, too much reliance on Crackpot Index which by its own criterion is a crackpot manuscript so making for a smart amateur even easier to destroy the science, no “scientific” acceptance of known to be true ideas like that electromagnetic waves sometimes harm brain, other scientific frauds, etc. So, now the world economy is a failure. The main part of this failure is no doubt wrong management of science.
I was trying to invent sophisticated economical and IT methods to improve science. But now I suppose that the right method to save science is to refuse science: I invented non-science. (This link is to a religious site, but the idea is based on mathematical theorem.)
Let’s define for further consideration a scientific publication a text (or software or data) that receives a scientific grant (defined as a grant from an accepted or well-financed scientific fund) for its publication or wide distribution or acceptance into expert community’s consideration.
The idea should be further improved and become more exact and specialized (particular):
We should try to create a variant of mathematics where ethics is a primary concept. (If we don’t, my system remains easily abused by replacing one math formulas with another equivalent ones and thus excluding ethical aspects from consideration.)
The entire question is which publications to receive finances and which not to.
Make it easier to publish?
To do this, reduce the number of scientific publications (by some new kind of an ethical standard?) to reduce competition?
Did ever discrimination of blacks, latinos, Jews, produced a super-stupid (genius that lost contact with social knowledge)?
Spartak? He isn’t really to be called a super
But discrimination of biggots has a different effect, it produced:
Osam bin Laden
Trump
Me
So, staying on one knee before biggots is much more appropriate than staying on one knee before blacks. Blacks are less dangerous. A single black or latino discriminated for being black or latino almost never causes the entire world economy to fall. Discrininated biggots do.
Super-stupids are a product of cancel culture. Cancelers isolate somebody from the society, if a poor biggot survives, then they get a long time isolated specie entered into their ecosystem and die.
The same people refuse to register their religious organizations in state registries “because it’s devil” and force their children to register sexual relations, because…?
An ancient Russian Orthodox prophecy (I remember for sure that such a prophecy exists, but I can’t find it in Internet, please comment with a reference.) says that the world will die as a result of forcibly parting ways of a loving couple of a man and a woman.
It accomplished this way:
I was 17, I met a 15 years girl. We started to speak. In scorn I asked her a question to laugh about a stupid answer. But she gave a correct answer. She is a genius!, though I. A few phrases, and I understood that she had essentially the same views as me.
The girl was also very beautiful and I proposed her marriage. She agreed.
We spoke about different things.
Among other things, I started to speak about sex. I offered her sex. But after a second remembered it may produce a child. But she responded she never yet had menstruation and so would not bear a child. We had sex. (The law about child “abuse” did not matter: we didn’t reach legal responsibility age.)
But our conspiracy was bad. Her father (He was a state official. Hm, maybe they were Maria Putina and Putin? I don’t remember that man’s look at all.) He forcibly parted us.
So, the world died this way, because I had no dowry to make my financial state sane.
This repeated several times. Apparently, I was also very happily married (apparently, without state registration) to a K-12 math teacher and to a math professor (both much elder than me, but I considered them young because despite of me being then a teenager, 24 or so years old women are sometimes felt by me as somehow too young) – maybe two math professors (one a white Russian and another black, probably American), but my head was hit so badly that I don’t know the details.
An amateur discovered a theory that in a significant relevant sense is more general than group theory.
The amateur wrote a very long scientific article (~400 pages), put Creative Commons on it and then mis-published it (this time instead of publishing in a predatory journal, it was published in a Russian scientific site with no English UI to purchase).
So, the long article has very few downloads.
Nobody does research on this topic, because scientific priority tradition forbids publishing on others’ research topics.
To made things worse, it was also discovered discontinuous analysis that relies on this fundamental theory.
So the world almost fully lost both this foundational axiomatic theory and discontinuous analysis. This essentially means no future science.
If you were a politician with power to decide, what law would you set?
Canceling intellectual property laws seems not to help in this particular case: The long article is open access.
The main issue seems to be in it being amateurish. So, it looks like that the solution would be to remove the concept of being an amateur. It is equal to removing the concept of scientific degrees. So, should we ban the words like PhD? But somebody would invent another word, so I see no reason that banning word PhD would solve this problem.
Either provide details that can be analyzed or this thread will be closed. As it is, this looks like some crackpot lost his mind over the rejection of his misinformed ideas and is now whining big time. There’s NOTHING to discuss in this thread’s current form. Do better! 2
Either provide details that can be analyzed or this thread will be closed. As it is, this looks like some crackpot lost his mind over the rejection of his misinformed ideas and is now whining big time. There’s NOTHING to discuss in this thread’s current form. Do better!
Thank you for your reply, I am doing your request that is I am providing details:
(The article does not contain some of my newest discoveries that I decided to keep to myself because the extrapolation of what I said in the original post witnesses that publishing it further could make things worse.)
The thing that is (in a sense) more general than group theory is my definition of “funcoid” using small delta (see the above text). It is more general because it does not use functions (a second class object in ZF) but only sets and relations (first class objects in ZF). However, TBH, my definition has 4 axioms rather than 2 axioms of group theory.
Also, funcoid can be defined equivalently using one axiom (but with more high-level objects).
The above text misses my later discoveries: discontinuous analysis and “space in general” (well, not quite in general, but in general topology). (I was afraid to publish further because of extrapolating this ill-effect to my future publications.)
Another relevant fact is that I was essentially banned from arXiv after their moderators lying to me. (That is probably a result of them being uncareful.) The most relevant aspect of that ban is that they provided no explanation at all of the reason of their effective ban, so I have no idea if they think I am a crackpot or no, etc. Maybe the reason was just that I published too many articles in one day.
What else do you want to know?
Oh, one more relevant detail to simplify your validation of the facts:
Here a famous established expert professor claims (well, implies) that my concepts are mathematically correct:
Well, this professor does not value my discovery as a big one – opinions of different scientists on importance of some discovery may be different. I claim that he is very wrong in not considering my discovery as a big one and can give persuading arguments.
To make your task even easier, I will explain what the above referenced PDF file is:
It is absolutely usual research article on the topic of fundamental mathematics except of just two things:
It is unusually long.
It was put online about the end of 20th century, but it would be a typical 18-19 century text except of its length (no idea how scientists “succeed” to miss this research topic.)
On the other hand, one can build on an idea and reference the paper, which might raise its profile.
Yes, but the trouble is that nobody (except of Todd Trimble that wrote a short comment) and about two prospective PhDs that referred to me without any quotes and any reason to refer except to refer to somebody to increase the count of literature references in their theses, that doesn’t count.
To simplify your work further, I say:
To verify that I did a big scientific discovery, it’s enough to read the very beginning of the PDF, because it is enough to know that I did found a new simple axiomatic system. Discovering a new simple and “elegant” axiomatic system is a big discovery in any case: either if it was thoroughly and correctly researched further or not. I claim that my book researches it correctly (small errors are possible, but that does not invalidate the entire stuff in my book) and rather thoroughly, but that’s mostly irrelevant for the sake of this thread discussion.
By the way, I found also another simple axiomatic system: Oversimplifying my ideas, I found axioms for “finite and infinite formulas”. That’s the joke about an old lady (mathematicians) that saw everything except the glasses (formulas) but lost the glasses themselves sitting on her nose (not discovered axioms about formulas).
Yet another my discovery is that I am the first who put words “ordered semigroup actions” or “actions of ordered semigroups” (and researched the properties of this three-words phrase), while before me there were only two-words phases “ordered semigroups” and “semigroup actions”. That sounds funny, but putting these three words together is a big discovery (but more is that I found a connection between these three words and general topology).
You can check this my claim using Google.
Not to contribute to the discussion but to add some humor:
Scientist: What else research topic to think about?
Advisor: Think out of the box!
Scientist: Which box?
Advisor: You have some mathematical object D. Think out of the box D(x), instead apply it to D itself, so write the formula D(D).
Scientist: What D would be exactly?
Advisor: Think about as many different kinds of formulas as possible!
Me: formula(formula).
More humor:
Scientist: We have the definition of uniform space: A filter on a binary Cartesian product + some axioms. To make it more general, we should remove some axioms. We are investigating about last 50 years which axioms to remove.
Scientists: Consider limit of a function on an arbitrarily chosen (and impossible to be pointed concretely) ultrafilter except of the principal ultrafilter “near” given point. The result depends on this incomprehensible for finite creatures choice.
Me: Consider all limits of a function on all (ultra)filters (including the principal ultrafilter) “near” a given point.
Yet humor:
Scientists: The properties of operators on a normed space are similar to properties of topological spaces… Operators are actions of semigroup… This semigroup is ordered.
Me: Consider actions of ordered semigroups. That’s a common generalization of topological spaces and operators on a normed space.
Yet:
Scientists: There are several kinds of continuity, defined in different ways, having in common, well, the word “continuity”.
Me: All kinds of continuity are foa<=bof for semigroup elements f, a, b and its operation o.
And:
What is science development discontinued by unlimited idiotism?
When we lost generalized limit defined for every discontinuous function.
Yet:
Student: Defining Lipshitzs derivative is a complex topic.
Me: f'(x) = lim_{r->0}(h|->(f(x+rh)-f(x))/r)).
Yet:
Hawkings got Nobel prize for finding the only explanation of black holes preserving information.
Me: Another explanation (yet not mathematically checked, because I work alone).
Oh, a new thought I never had:
LHC scientific measurement system produces small black holes that accordingly Hawkings’s theory quickly burst and therefore don’t devour the Earth.
If not Hawkings’s but my explantion happens to be right… They most probably don’t burst at all… and devour the Earth. Edited June 2 by porton
Very little you’ve said aids any kind of meaningful discussion. You really need to focus on one little thing at a time, and be as clear as possible. THIS IS NOT A BLOG! We’re not going to discuss why your book didn’t get published. This is a science discussion forum.
[This is my letter to Victoria Amunga, who became a Voice of America journalist in order to speak so loudly that she would not hear my voice. Mad woman Victoria Amunga didn’t believe in the obvious truth that God will revenge that bastard woman by my prayer that I will receive a louder voice that her.] I told some of these things to Victoria. I got a phone to record our conversation as a video, but he hid behind a door. So I told her just some of the things I am writing here. Here I reprise our conversation and add more: (I married a Kenyan Victoria yesterday after paying her parents $800 + $200 debt bride price.) A wife is defined in the Bible as a suitable helper. You didn’t help me suitably. So you are a fake wife. Our marriage certificate is a fake document, so I am not going to deliver it to the Israel authorities to get you a visa as this would be illegal. And why would I do? It looks like that soon I could have a good work to hire a servant instead of you to do the homework. I asked you to write a short article for my blog explaining my idea about my recently invented technology “crypto reward courts” to save the world from poverty and underfinancing and probably even stop global warming. But you steadfastly served to your holy Baal-TV even refusing to speak to me. When you told you this, you answered: “Why should I work, don’t force me”. I replied: “If you had love, the love would force you to work”. She didn’t even reply to say whether she thinks if she has love. Bible says that a virtuous wife’s price is worth of sapphires. I think human body weight sapphire would cost trillions dollars. This is the estimation of the amount of good works a wife does. It would be a good work if you helped me with this project. The difference between a wife and a prostitute is that a wife is worth more. So if you are not worth a trillion dollars, so you are not a wife but a prostitute. You were a bad prostitute. I request your parents to return the price paid by me for the weight of sapphires, as it was fake that she is a Christian. If you don’t return the money for this fake merchandise, I am going to put you into a prison for selling a fake merchandise. She’s baptism is fake, as she does not have love. You asked why you should obey you. I answered: Sarah called her husband “master” (it means that she obeyed him). Bible calls Sarah a virtuous wife. So it logically follows that Sarah was worth many trillions dollars if to measure her “weight” in modern money. You are not worth the $800 I paid you, so you’d better stay on your knees before me because I do have love (both for the world and for Christ that is for mathematics) and you don’t. If you don’t love mathematics that is Christ, you are better to feel on your knees when you meet a mathematician like me. It is because like St. Paul I denied everything for the all-exceeding knowledge. You say “I do work.” meaning that you work for money. It implies that you hate God because Jesus taught that you can’t love two masters: God and money, if you love one you will hate another. I asked you what Moses or Elijah would do if saw that you serve to Baal-TV more than to God. Your heart was stone. No reply. You didn’t even agree for enough sex. She tried to speak with me as little as possible. Your claim that you love me was fake. Christians associate themselves with angels, you associate yourself with a woman of this world, so you are a sexual pervert. In short, Victoria is a typical Baptist serving to the mother Earth, our evil mother that I hate as Jesus said to hate our mother. That I have a divorce, is not a problem at all. I have zero reputation because I dedicated my life to God not to men. So my reputation can’t be harmed. And I yet have no fake money (dollars, I mean), so the divorce won’t harm my finances. I really don’t divorce a wife, I just made a mistake, slept with a prostitute. But even if I would divorce, I do not live by the law forbidding to divorce, as everybody who lives accordingly the law is under God’s anger.
Later addition: She is a believer in the fake science that math talent is measured by longevity of a sexual act. She also is a believer in the fake science that if a sexual act was once of a bad quality then both: a. it would kept to be of a bad quality if tried to be repeated; b. it is always because of a man, not for a woman who decided to do it in the worst dress she had and not even follow my plea to ogle for me and also has an extremely big vagina, what she essentially faked me to be of normal size.
Answer, a vile bastard: You are before the court of God. BTW, I cursed Kenya for you, Mercy Wafula Nekesa, and your lawyer Polycarp Tembpa for fire, earthquakes, and drough. Today I saw in TV a big part of Africa, apparently fully including Kenya fully in fire. You didn’t come to God, God came to you!
You fake Christian tried to force me to do what I want while I didn’t want to do what I want. Vile bastard, now I do what I want: I wanted to fire Kenya and I did as you wanted me to do what I want.
Certainly I do not enumerate all crimes of Israelis, but every of these is surely morally worth death penalty. (I do not claim that this punishment should be applied. Instead, I think it should be declared death penalty and amnested, because justice would require to execute every body who voted for these bastards.)
So the crimes I want to blame them in:
They prevent such things as food supply to poors and climate actions (in other words, they are doing a genocide – note that I do know that to think that government members are genocidaires is indecent). Their method to kill people (yes, they are maniac killers) is to assign high price for NGO (Amuta) registration in order to disinform each other that a given person does not do good deeds. (That’s scientifically called “a prohibitive tax for doing good deeds”.) They disinform international funds to prevent receipt grants and doing good things both in Israel and abroad. Well, they could be legally considered insane because they closed their ears: they hear only organizations rather than people and therefore cut off from themselves a part of information. Have you ever heard: Hear Israel! You are unable to hear even this little part of the Torah that says Hear! This also constitutes (clearly illegal) selling the right to have a voice.
They disinform robots (scientific databases and search engine indexes) what is investing into fake science that is a form of scientific fraud in order for robots to disinform people by such methods as caste sytem where to asses that a given person has scientific knowledge he/she needs to pay a high assessment price (for the thing called higher education). Again, a violation of Hear, Israel!
They for their financial interest disinform people that Messianic Jews are not reformed Judaists. Messianic Jews have all traits of reformed Judaist (such as reading Torah, beleiving in it, etc.) Well, they can choose to use their own criterion of belonging to their liked friends instead of enumerating the list of traits of belonging to a category, can’ they? This is a financial crime, because it controls only economical resources.
They prevented many people from studying Hebrew this way: They force to use Hebrew to get a good job, therefore people not knowing Hebrew well can’t afford advanced studing it.
They (particularly, former minister of Aliah and absorbtion Sofa Landver) are financial fraudsters: They said to me that Hebrew is easier than English. The fact is that Heebrew has order of 15 times more elementary grammatical classes than English. Hebrew seems for me not as easy as Enlgish but as difficult as e.g. Russian. I studied Russian from childhood and 12 years in a school, they lied that I can learn Hebrew well in just a few months. I (and many others) were deceived by these fraudsters wanting to raise their economy by more workers by lying abuout Hebrew complexity. That’s a again an economical fraud.
Personally Naftaili Bennentt is a bastard traitor: I informed him by email about this security vulnerability and he chose to ignore this awful notice, traiting his profession occupation, computer security, in other words choosing the side of a mental damage of humanity, that is of sin. Again, Bennentt is a proponent of mental illness, that’s equal to being a worker of Hitler.
They should have forced businesses at very least to label ecologically unsafe products and provide ecological alternatives (such as non-plastic packaging) but they would also force businesses to do this not as an alternative not to be criminals. So, they are like Hitler’s paid generals that don’t want to protect their victims against ecology and weather going worse.
They forced me an obviously (even without advanced psyhiatric knowledge that’s obvious after reading a little of psychiatric texts) wrong psychiatric healing, that among other things bringed me to receive a poor disability pension (read: bad food (more precisely, almost exclusively cheap pitas with phalaphel) and damge of health by going by foot long distances instead of taxi + damaging to my feelings living with a woman that did a big violence to me in the past and to keep hearing 24/7 loud delirium of her TV player + forcing me to work for my misanthroping brother who is a strong proponent of violence, etc.) instead of a high quafied programmer’s salary in two ways: 1. by healing me with drugs that caused me all time want to sleep (and no other effects on my psychological space, not counting side effects such as a probability of cancer) and therefore not being able to do work at my best; 2. apparently, they reported my (forged) diagnosis to employers (and didn’t provide me money to hire a lawyer to check if this is a fact) in order for employers to discriminate me. (I think so because of me having been unable to find any job, what could be exaplained by 100% of the employers committing the discrimination crime.) BTW, the diagnosis was forged indirectly caused by the reason of their fraud (see above) about Messianic Jews.
Israelis are criminal slaves of Russians: They confirmed the forged by Russians amount of money on my bank account, what consitutes forging financial documents. Russians (incuding high state officals including Yeltsin) in the most evil violent criminal ways violating all laws deprived me of confirming my univeristy study by an scientific degree and of other sources of monetary income than a scientific degree thus in effect forging a sum on my bank account and Israel and Jews use these forged monetary documents for their financial accounting. (In my opinion, the most just legal recompense of them to me would be them investing into my blockchain that sustains justice to everybody.) Also, Israel concealed crimes of Russians (including Yeltsin and his slaves such as Putin).
Avigdor Liberman advised to fine poor people for poverty (this kind of fine is called regressive tax, exactly the scientific term used by Liberman). I’d vote for putting Liberman into a mental hospital.
This situation is similar to the 30ths years story from an alternative quantum reality about Germany: Einstein was put into a death camp, survived (because a piece of paper money was brought onto him by a wind after his prayer for money), fled, but because of hunger he didn’t receive a scientific degree and because all the world was fascist was unable to publish relativity theory in the correct way (because of not having a scientific advisor who advises how to publish), so because of being deceived by “scholars” who mocked that common man for not having a degree, he by a mis-publication blocked development of science. In that quantum world Einstein was the Torah scholar who grasped the lost main principle of interpretation of Torah known only to pupils of the Rabi Gamaliel. But who speaks with Torah scholars? But Einstein succeeded to build a high traffic gazette, what’s next?
