By the way I am trying to destroy “ant philosophy”: for example, taxi drivers think that they are most important and being specialized in money cannot drive me for free if in occasion I may need it thinking that they have unchangeable destiny to be ants, premiers of Israel think that they are destined to be despisors and therefore are slaves of unchangeable desire to be “mad” (unwilling to speak).
That is both lower and upper class think that’s their social function and this cannot be changed. “Ant philosophy”, people become brutes. That’s the fruit of interbreeding Marxism with fatalism that controls not only left wing but right wing, too. Together thay are very strong in madness, this kind of stupidity survives very well.
The main(?) difference between a few tens years ago and now:
Tens years ago: Nash: “I am [literally: my time is] infinitely more important than you[rs].
Now: Everybody: “I am infinitely more important than you[rs].”
Compare Torah “Do not ill-treat a stranger or oppress him.”
But when people not just live in Capitalism but believe in Capitalism (now not Torah but Capitalism is the belief of Jews), then everybody ill-treats each other (What is to ill-treat? To consider on other conditions than somebody other. Now everybody of you except me considers others differently than yourself, that is you ill-treat others.)
Open Torah and know the consequences of your weird stupid belief that you should live accordingly Capitalism (not just take into account that now it’s Capitalism and you should take into account that you are now it’s Capitalism).
Disgusting bastard, my orientation is not sexual! I am oriented to mathematics. It seems I am the only man on the Earth that has non-sexual orientation, rewrite disgusting bastard orientation science textbooks.
Well, I am in a man’s body and my hardware does want a woman. Is there any woman with non-sexual orientation? I would probably marry you.
В либертарианстве и либерализме есть много хороших идей (см. любой либертарианский сайт).
Но к “рыбе” прилипла паразитическая “минога” – посторонний объект: мнение что каждый должен жить только для себя (не помогать другим).
Несмотря на то, что в научном определении либертарианства идеи “не помогать другим” нет, обычно, когда говорят “либертарианство”, имеют в виду именно это. Вместе с миногой рыба очень ядовита.
Думать так могут только дурачки.
Теорема: Либертарианство с “миногой” противоречиво.
Доказательство: Либертарианство существует для общественного блага. Сторонники миноги утверждают, что общественного блага не существует (математическая бессмыслица уже, но я продолжу опровергать). Следовательно, сторонники “миногного” либертариансва отрицают либертарианство.
First consider a hypothetical situation: What if we somehow lose group theory? Group theory is kinda half of mathematics. More precisely, it is kinda a foundation of kinda like half of modern mathematics. If you get any modern math research (or a serious textbook), the I estimated the probability of having something from group theory in it as about 75%.
So, if group theory disappeared, we would lose 75% of mathematics. We probably would with a big amount of hard work restore about 5-10% in the lost part. So, if group theory were lost, we would lose 65-75% of math. (The numbers are very imprecise, they are to illustrate the principle, not for an exact calculation.)
Because the science is based on math, we would lose half of the science.
The following is the well-agreed list of reasons why group theory is so much important:
Group theory is just a few very simple formulas.
Group theory nevertheless has many complex consequences.
Group theory is related (as a foundation of) with many other things in mathematics.
In my first year of university study (1998 year) I discovered the following system of axioms (X, Y, I, J, K are sets and is δ is a binary relation):
not ∅ δ Y
not X δ ∅
I∪J δ K ⇔ I δ K ∧ J δ K
K δ I∪J ⇔ K δ I ∧ K δ J
I will show that these four formulas (no formula less, no formula more) together are super-tough.
Four axioms versus 5 axioms of group theory. Simple formulas. Many complex consequences. (That’s a fact, I have already written hundreds of pages about this.) And it is related with general topology and therefore just like group theory related with most of mathematics.
So, it is as important as group theory? More likely, it is even more important, because group theory has just one (known) “fundamental” cryptomorphism and this system of axioms has several cryptomorphisms. Every serious expert in math agrees that having multiple cryptomorphisms is a sign of something being important. Also, I repeat, 4 instead of 5 axioms.
So, this my discovery is apparently (not with 100% but with like 90% confidence) more important than group theory.
Isaac Newton, who discovered continuous analysis
I did some other discoveries, several most fundamental like this and many less fundamental. They include, for example, discontinuous analysis. Without it, it’s impossible to fully resolve for example the philosophical question “What is the main reason?”
The laughable story of this big discovery is that I thought several months when I was a first year student, when I was very near to this result, my mother sent me out of the house to for being a Baptist, and finished the discovery after eating grass on the street for a launch.
As the result of Russian discriminatory hunger of real Baptists (fake are not), I was forced to leave the university without any degree. There is however a laughable Russian document about me having an education with no degree, and American bastards confirmed me having education with no degree. (So, logically, this is an official US’s government certificate telling “We are a fake science.”)
So, I got no:
right to receive a salary for my work
right to get money to be published
academic advisor (“advisor” is a scary word from the science of computer security, they call by this word when instead of turning off a circuit there is a text telling “Don’t press this dangerous button, please!”)
With no advise of advisor (advice is paid) I did a wrong thing: I mis-published my scientific research.
I wrote a too long (400 pages) scientific article, put on it a too generous copyright, and the world publication system choked by this (master)piece.
So, choked world is dying. Computer scientists call this kind of errors buffer overflow.
The sheep is mankind, the ring is me 🙂
So, now the science is like a building being built having a half of foundation or a car going with a missing wheel.
So, put figuratively: I discovered that our car (science) has a missing wheel, I tried to attach the wheel, but the wheel mount is so much bad that it broke, too.
It like as if in biology we knew millions of species but cat, cow, and wheat were discovered just recently. Nobody noticed that they need to be included into the classification. An we would say like “well, that plant that usually grows on fields… we need to measure its characteristics again”. “How to get rid of mouses? anyone?”; “The amount of seeds produced by this thing that grows on fields and the amount of nitrates needed to grow that thing that growth on fields are definitely related fields of science, a professor noticed in his book, however we are not sure what is the exact relation between them.”
Famous mathematicians such as Timothy Gowers and Terrence Tao, despite of being comparably clever to me, need a psychiatrist:
These hundreds-dollars salaries people seriously thought that the “revolt of mathematicians” that they tried to lead is about them, not about qualified amateurs (the world “amateur” means a human who has not enough money to buy the right to receive a salary for his/her work) who really can’t pay for publication.
So, Russians stole $50 trillion by religiously discriminating me.
Americans and other West stole by their national academies accumulating money and crushing their alleged competitors (These bastards think that all the world consists of competitors 🙂 No, me exists despite of their disbelief in my existence.)
It is attached my research (volume-1.pdf is a finished book manuscript, volume-3.pdf is more a partial work) in highly abstract pure mathematics.
It is not full track of my research. I also have more research on related topic and research on an unrelated topic (an axiomatization of finite and infinite formulas).
Please not that to the best of my knowledge, I am the only person in the History who discovered more than one (I discovered about three, dependently on how to count) new fundamental branches of mathematics. (Von Neummann discovered several, but they are not as fundamental as mine.)
In exceptional cases, the institution may submit a request to receive special permission. Requests should be addressed to israkeren@isf.org.il.
So, it is this special case:
I was forced out of a university after 5 years of study without any degree or diploma because of extreme hate to my religious and political views while long time almost dying of hunger.
In other words I now have not enough money to purchase the right to receive money for work (it’s called “higher education”).
Please trigger this special case and provide me personal funding. If you don’t, see block-science.pdf
The sneaky (do I need the word “sneaky” before the rest of the world) fascist at the other end decided to turn off his brain by hate and to ignore the information. (Almost no doubt: He did thought: Anti-discrimination laws in Israel? That does not matter: Legal system such as courts discriminates, too.)
So, “Hear, Israel!” was violated on the sum of $50 trillion. You are not Jews, you are not people, you are now animals, defined as these who cannot hear.
Everybody of my acquintances (and this includes Timothy Gowers and Terrence Tao) stole $50 trillion by their force to move money in wrong direction.
For me it means exceedingly more than $50 trillion of value. Only brain damaged people can value money that they can’t eat or put inside.
My response? I (like Elijah) attack Israel with magic! Can you judge me, death-penalty worth thieves?
It’s not only money! Math is used not only in economy but in politics, communication, education, etc., and even theology (You don’t do? I do.) You lost God.
Related Links
You to get disability in despising – the particular sin that triggered this security vulnerability (buffer overflow) of the civilization
In this article I consider a hypothetical situation when a scientist blocks research in a certain area instead of advancing it. Looks like that I found a possible loophole in modern science practices and ethics. Maybe this situation has come real?
For the example of the situation I will consider the real situation with my research. I can’t concisely enough prove that the situation with me is real (you may ask if my amateur research is a crackpottery and I can’t prove you otherwise except of forcing you to spend days reading many pages with formulas). But this does not matter for the scientific thesis (or rather hypothesis) of this article, because a similar enough situation obviously can happen (if not with me then with somebody other) because clearly the probability densities of the “coordinates” are not extremely low and there are not so many “coordinates”.
So, in the first year of the university study I discovered a new mathematical axiom that leads to a new big fundamental branch of mathematics. Later I was forced to be withdrawn from the university by religious discrimination (as a Protestant almost dying of hunger in Russia), not receiving any degree.
I withdrew from the degree obtaining, but not from the research. So after years I produced a hundreds of pages text with a new fundamental branch of mathematics. Now my discoveries include among other a generalization of limit for an arbitrary (even discontinuous) function at every point, so allowing to research discontinuous analysis, and a definition of “space in general” (I exaggerated: in fact, it encompasses just all these kinds spaces that are met in general topology, for example, topological spaces, uniform spaces, and metric spaces, locales, and frames.) and many other related things.
I did also another, unrelated, discovery: I discovered an algebraic axiomatic system for “formulas” or kinda theory of infinite formulas. Funny enough, mathematicians produced axiomatic theories for almost everything but like the babushka from a joke forgot to search the glasses on her own nose forgot to axiomatize formulas. In my personal opinion, this axiomatic theory is the base for the future electronics, probably.
Because I had not enough money to buy the right of my work to be paid (it is called “scientific degree”), I had no incentive to publish journal articles and published just one (I’d say of a mediocre scientific value) journal article [1] on a related topic.
So instead of writing articles I switched to a holistic approach of writing it as a long monograph, not doing the pseudo-scientific “surgery” of cutting this “living” book into parts.
Being misled by widespread claims that publishing open access would increase adoption of my work, I put Creative Commons on my book. As it turned out it does not apply to amateurs because the book publishers don’t publish open access work unless paid big money for and there is no way for an amateur to obtain funding except as by being unusually successful in running his own business. (I tell it as the world best expert in amateur science. :-).)
Later I succeeded to publish my monograph [2] (to be precise an old version of my book) with a Russian publisher INFRA-M. They published even despite it is open access.
When I send my article about generalized limit to a journal, the journals repeatedly “politely” say that it does not conform to their standards. I strongly guess that the real reason is: They realize that they need to obtain a copy from a Russian language site to check if my monograph to which I refer in the article to verify that I really published it and they don’t want to read my book to verify proofs in the article.
I also tried to publish in arXiv, but:
As not being affiliated with an institution, I had no default submission rights and so sought approval (being mostly ignored) from somebody already published for a long time to be allowed to be published.
I received approval after all and published my book and several shorter articles at arXiv. Shortly after publication they were removed. I asked the moderation why they were removed and received no explanation. Apparently they choose to train my brain by forcing me to guess their reasoning. Maybe the removal was because I submitted too many articles in a single day (I asked if it was the case, but they choose to ignore an undermensh.), maybe because they assumed that my claims are too grandiose to be likely true.
They told that I need to publish in a peer reviewed journal before publishing in arXiv.
Later I tried to submit again and it was again removed:
“Our moderators request that you limit your submissions to those that have already been published in mainstream conventional journals. Submissions that do not contain a journal reference and/or DOI (that resolves to a journal’s website) will be removed. If a significant number of your articles have been published over a reasonable period of time, we will reconsider this status.”
So, I’ve submitted an article published in a mainstream conventional journal with a reference to journal website. [1]
They decided that they should apply lying (see the quote from the email above) to mitigate undermenshes and removed this article, too.
Now scientific ethics comes to play:
I would possibly re-publish the book as several articles in journals, but scientific ethics forbids to publish in research journals results already published elsewhere and my book is published by INFRA-M. Moreover, to split it into parts and communicate with journals is much work and would possibly take years (while I also need to earn money). So, it is near to impossible to re-publish my book as journal articles.
Therefore it is greatly hindered to publish my (accordingly to the considered be it hypothetical or real situation, producing a big scientific revolution) articles in an “ethical” way.
I also tried to formalize my research in a proof assistant (a computer program that checks correctness of math proofs), among other reasons to publish it in their database of computer-checked proofs, but I found that not every genius is able to use such software in the state of hardness to use it has in this decade (even despite the fact that I was able to make several small new results in the fields of computer-assisted proofs research in the way of trying to rewrite my book in a computer language).
Funny? I may have blocked science development: I can’t publish on this topic and nobody other can publish on this topic because scientific ethics forbids to publish results discovered by others.
So, it looks like that a fundamental research topic (not only my research but also everything that would depend on it!) became non-publishable (to be precise non-reviewable) at all. It’s like genetics and cybernetics in Stalin’s USSR, but now the trouble covers the entire Earth.
Maybe this problem will incidentally resolve (for example, if I earn enough money to save the science to be blocked (for centuries?)), but it looks like the possibility that this problem or a similar problem (e.g. with another amateur researcher) may grow big. Maybe we already have past instances of similar problems of different size of impact on development of science with other researchers (not necessarily not finished education, they may for example just lose the diploma during a flight, or even deliberately block science).
As a possible solution I propose to create a site for re-publishing open access works (including books) of another publishers for free. Another important direction is helping me (and others) to receive a Bachelor degree in mathematics without spending money.
Please forgive me for being light-minded, I lightly assumed that the problem would likely “dissolve” by itself. Now you need to solve it if you have a university connection.
Bibliography
1: Victor Porton, Filters on Posets and Generalizations, 2012
2: Victor Porton, Algebraic General Topology. Volume 1, 2019
Certainly I do not enumerate all crimes of Israelis, but every of these is surely morally worth death penalty. (I do not claim that this punishment should be applied. Instead, I think it should be declared death penalty and amnested, because justice would require to execute every body who voted for these bastards.)
So the crimes I want to blame them in:
They prevent such things as food supply to poors and climate actions (in other words, they are doing a genocide – note that I do know that to think that government members are genocidaires is indecent). Their method to kill people (yes, they are maniac killers) is to assign high price for NGO (Amuta) registration in order to disinform each other that a given person does not do good deeds. (That’s scientifically called “a prohibitive tax for doing good deeds”.) They disinform international funds to prevent receipt grants and doing good things both in Israel and abroad. Well, they could be legally considered insane because they closed their ears: they hear only organizations rather than people and therefore cut off from themselves a part of information. Have you ever heard: Hear Israel! You are unable to hear even this little part of the Torah that says Hear! This also constitutes (clearly illegal) selling the right to have a voice.
They disinform robots (scientific databases and search engine indexes) what is investing into fake science that is a form of scientific fraud in order for robots to disinform people by such methods as caste sytem where to asses that a given person has scientific knowledge he/she needs to pay a high assessment price (for the thing called higher education). Again, a violation of Hear, Israel!
They for their financial interest disinform people that Messianic Jews are not reformed Judaists. Messianic Jews have all traits of reformed Judaist (such as reading Torah, beleiving in it, etc.) Well, they can choose to use their own criterion of belonging to their liked friends instead of enumerating the list of traits of belonging to a category, can’ they? This is a financial crime, because it controls only economical resources.
They prevented many people from studying Hebrew this way: They force to use Hebrew to get a good job, therefore people not knowing Hebrew well can’t afford advanced studing it.
They (particularly, former minister of Aliah and absorbtion Sofa Landver) are financial fraudsters: They said to me that Hebrew is easier than English. The fact is that Heebrew has order of 15 times more elementary grammatical classes than English. Hebrew seems for me not as easy as Enlgish but as difficult as e.g. Russian. I studied Russian from childhood and 12 years in a school, they lied that I can learn Hebrew well in just a few months. I (and many others) were deceived by these fraudsters wanting to raise their economy by more workers by lying abuout Hebrew complexity. That’s a again an economical fraud.
Personally Naftaili Bennentt is a bastard traitor: I informed him by email about this security vulnerability and he chose to ignore this awful notice, traiting his profession occupation, computer security, in other words choosing the side of a mental damage of humanity, that is of sin. Again, Bennentt is a proponent of mental illness, that’s equal to being a worker of Hitler.
They should have forced businesses at very least to label ecologically unsafe products and provide ecological alternatives (such as non-plastic packaging) but they would also force businesses to do this not as an alternative not to be criminals. So, they are like Hitler’s paid generals that don’t want to protect their victims against ecology and weather going worse.
They forced me an obviously (even without advanced psyhiatric knowledge that’s obvious after reading a little of psychiatric texts) wrong psychiatric healing, that among other things bringed me to receive a poor disability pension (read: bad food (more precisely, almost exclusively cheap pitas with phalaphel) and damge of health by going by foot long distances instead of taxi + damaging to my feelings living with a woman that did a big violence to me in the past and to keep hearing 24/7 loud delirium of her TV player + forcing me to work for my misanthroping brother who is a strong proponent of violence, etc.) instead of a high quafied programmer’s salary in two ways: 1. by healing me with drugs that caused me all time want to sleep (and no other effects on my psychological space, not counting side effects such as a probability of cancer) and therefore not being able to do work at my best; 2. apparently, they reported my (forged) diagnosis to employers (and didn’t provide me money to hire a lawyer to check if this is a fact) in order for employers to discriminate me. (I think so because of me having been unable to find any job, what could be exaplained by 100% of the employers committing the discrimination crime.) BTW, the diagnosis was forged indirectly caused by the reason of their fraud (see above) about Messianic Jews.
Israelis are criminal slaves of Russians: They confirmed the forged by Russians amount of money on my bank account, what consitutes forging financial documents. Russians (incuding high state officals including Yeltsin) in the most evil violent criminal ways violating all laws deprived me of confirming my univeristy study by an scientific degree and of other sources of monetary income than a scientific degree thus in effect forging a sum on my bank account and Israel and Jews use these forged monetary documents for their financial accounting. (In my opinion, the most just legal recompense of them to me would be them investing into my blockchain that sustains justice to everybody.) Also, Israel concealed crimes of Russians (including Yeltsin and his slaves such as Putin).
Avigdor Liberman advised to fine poor people for poverty (this kind of fine is called regressive tax, exactly the scientific term used by Liberman). I’d vote for putting Liberman into a mental hospital.
This situation is similar to the 30ths years story from an alternative quantum reality about Germany: Einstein was put into a death camp, survived (because a piece of paper money was brought onto him by a wind after his prayer for money), fled, but because of hunger he didn’t receive a scientific degree and because all the world was fascist was unable to publish relativity theory in the correct way (because of not having a scientific advisor who advises how to publish), so because of being deceived by “scholars” who mocked that common man for not having a degree, he by a mis-publication blocked development of science. In that quantum world Einstein was the Torah scholar who grasped the lost main principle of interpretation of Torah known only to pupils of the Rabi Gamaliel. But who speaks with Torah scholars? But Einstein succeeded to build a high traffic gazette, what’s next?
