Blog

One of the reasons why the world economy is slowly but quite confidently moving towards a catastrophe, the following two philosophical concepts that occupy most of the people together (except for the last idiots who have no philosophy at all):

1. A person thinks and is controlled only by the brain (atheists and some others).
2. The person thinks and is governed by the soul or spirit (classical forms of Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, etc.)

Each of these two concepts leads to a catastrophe, but each in its own way:

1. If a person is governed only by the brain, then there is no soul or spirit, there is no continuation of life, a person’s life is by and large meaningless, if there is any meaning, then it is to snatch as much as possible now, harming everyone else. Indifference, depression, greed, leading to theft and other crimes, can easily destroy the global economy.
2. If a person thinks or is governed by soul or spirit, life on Earth also does not make sense, there is no sense in taking care of your body and brain, there is no sense in developing an economy, there is no sense in treating yourself, making money, doing good on Earth. This, too, can easily destroy the global economy.

Moreover, both concepts contradict the facts:

• Thinking, feelings, and what is called “spirituality” of a person depends on the brain (and as a result, on other environmental and health conditions). If a person is hit on the head, his thoughts, feelings, character, change. The fact that a person thinks with some kind of “spirit” is unscientific and contradicts the ordinary human experience.
• That there is no supernatural revelation, “death experiences”, etc. also contradicts experience.

If a person is confused in the contradictions of science, his personal experience, and religious revelations, this can lead to even greater problems than each of these concepts separately, such as: apathy from not understanding what needs to be done, harsh, fanatical actions, despair, absurdities such as “rejection of death”, and sometimes suicide.

I offer a way out, a philosophical concept that better explains the world and, as far as I know, does not create such problems: the soul exists, but the soul is nothing but a backup copy (in the “computer” sense) of the brain or electromagnetic radiation of the brain that continues to exist in the universe.

This makes our material and spiritual life much more understandable: We can compare ourselves with what we know well, ordinary computers.

Nobody stops taking care of his computer just because he has a backup, because we know that the computer itself and its restoration from a backup copy are worth something. And we can not despair that in three years the computer will surely break and we will lose all our files, which would make all our work useless.

Similarly, if we accept this philosophical concept, we will neither neglect our health nor be depressed by the fear of death or dementia. We understand that nothing on Earth can truly harm us: we have a backup in the sky. Even if our thoughts and feelings deteriorate, we will be restored to heaven.

And, in my opinion, this new philosophical concept is in good agreement with the Bible. We are waiting for the resurrection of the dead – restoring from a backup with a new brain that will work without bugs, like a good computer.

If you do not promote this concept, the global economy will inevitably face a catastrophe. Like this post. Promote it.

Another post on this topic.

Christ in us is a dream (“hope” in most Bible translations) of glory (Col. 1:27). Christ lives in us as “something” and this something, it is nothing but a dream of glory. So the meaning of life in achieving glory, that is, hype on the heavenly Internet. Heavenly Internet is called Christ. Christ is the light of the world (John 8:12; 9:5; 12:46), that is, the electromagnetic radiation of the universe. Thus, all the electromagnetic radiation of the universe is a carrier of information, the cosmic Internet. But the glory of God is almost the same as Christ. Christ is mathematics: (John 1:1-3) “1 In the beginning was mathematics, and mathematics was with God, and mathematics was God. 2 It was in the beginning with God. 3 All through it began to be, and without it nothing began to be, that began to be.” That is, we are talking about the dream of mathematics, the dream of studying and realizing it. Christ is the most important thing in us, which means that this is the main purpose of life. We will endlessly travel like electromagnetic waves on the Internet space, looking for hype, that is tough mathematics.

So, the most important thing in us is the dream of fame.

(Rom. 8:24-25) “24 For we are saved in hope. Hope, when he sees, is not hope; for if anyone sees, then what shall he hope for? 25 But when we hope for that which we do not see, then we wait in patience.”

“We are saved in hope” means that our salvation consists of a dream just as a table can consist of wood. That is, our dreams will go to heaven. But I’m not about this now. When a person with a dream of glory already sees glory, this is no longer a dream, and therefore it is not Christ in us. Christ in us is only a dream of glory that is not yet visible.

So, our task is to give an opportunity to become famous, to those who dream but still do not see an opportunity to become famous.

For example, I have (among other things) the following three topics for PR (really cool news, by the way) for which I collect money:

•  Press release of a world news (living Google) (about how the Google’s big computer suddenly came to life and tried to make contact with people)
• Press release a world news to journalists (a missionary sold A mission to the devil) (how missionary sold the mission to the devil)
• Press release a world news to journalists (maddest fundraiser ever)
• Press release a world news to journalists (real superman) (a human was during a month a superman with computer brain)
• as well as advertising this blog

But I have no money at the moment to make these press releases.

I write about this well I understand that most of you do not care before Christ in me or in someone else. But you should care, you have to fulfill the dream of glory.

Bible says to have love. But “love” can also be translated from Greek as “charity” that is NGO (non-governmental organization) in modern language.

Isn’t the author of this blog post too radical? Isn’t love something great and NGO just a common thing?

Not quite so. It may be a very hard task to register an NGO following all rules and procedures without a formal violation of a law.

For example, the author faced the following problem: He wanted to do good but didn’t well understand how to do good. For example, he wanted to get profit to register an NGO, then he would like to get money from the project to register another NGO to do more good, etc. Needless to say, I was unable to invent how to fill the official documents on this topic. It turned be as hard as to fulfill the Gospel.

If you don’t have an NGO, your life is useless. Dot. (I don’t mean that the project necessary needs to be officially registered.) So says Bible:

(1Cor. 13) 1 Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal. 2 And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries, and all knowledge; and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing. 3 And though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and though I give my body to be burned, and have not charity, it profits me nothing.

It was nearly about me: I prayed tongues, had the gift of prophecy, understood many mysteries and am a great mathematician, I had great faith, following the letter of Bible especially thoroughly and fanatically, and produced real wonders. I did math research to profit people in a trillion dollars. I was not burned, but suffered hunger, beating, etc.

It “profited me nothing”: I was unable to do neither commerce nor charity. Having no good opportunities of a job, I almost died from hunger.

Later God taught me something (read my blog and books) and now I have NGOs (not yet officially registered though).

Want to start working for a charity? For a start consider this list of projects. It was very hard for me because of being a religious fanatic. But for you it can be much easier, just take today the decision to start work or donate for a nonprofit project today.

(1Cor. 13:13) “And now stays faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.”

(1Cor. 14:1) “Follow after charity, and desire spiritual gifts…”

(1Cor. 16:14) “Let all your things be done with charity.”

(Gal. 5:13) “For, brothers, you have been called to liberty; only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another.”

(Col. 3:14) “And above all these things put on charity, which is the bond of perfection.”

(1Th. 3:12) “And the Lord make you to increase and abound in love one toward another, and toward all men, even as we do toward you”

(1Pet. 4:8) “And above all things have fervent charity among yourselves…”

(1Jn. 4:7) “… for love is of God…”

By the way God is an NGO (1Jn. 4:16).

So the brothers and everyone else betrayed me.

Like Joseph from the Bible, it did more good than harm. My torment and offences led to the fact that (after torment, hunger, offences, blows by a frying pan to my head, huge losses for me and for many others) I corrected an important theological mistake (and this is much better than becoming a prime minister), because I was forced to a narrow path, being driven by other people to extremes.

So the people have fulfilled God’s will.

And, weidly enough, they did it on purpose so that I could correct the error, and not just like stupid puppets. There is nothing to blame them for: by large, they acted correctly and wisely.

Some of the arguments of the “clergy” (for example, Bishop Eduard Grabovenko) are understandable: they wanted God to experience the young minister by suffering. But to implement this “plan” there is only one way: to offend, betray, commit violations of the laws, stand in the battle on the same side as Satan. If we reformulate the arguments of the “churchmen”, what it is: the one who has more money (the “senior minister”) should cause damage to the one who has less money (the “junior minister”). Where this “principle” comes from is well understood – these are the principles of the US Republican Party (do not think that I am for the Democratic Party). It became a church doctrine, because many preachers are American Republicans.

Speaking of Republicans: I think their main principle is that if a person is poor, then he deserved it, it means that the rich should humiliate the poor so that they become even poorer. (At the place of Donald Trump, I would adopt an official resolution “we don’t anymore follow this principle, convicted in following this principle will be excluded from the party”.)

If someone has at least some intelligence, after reading this my sermon, he will never do that again. You did this to correct my mistake – a good deed, but a mistake can be fixed only once. That is why I called this sermon the “principle of the second time”. It is all the same, as if Joseph’s brothers, having learned that they had “made” him prime minister, would again betray their comrades saying “such is God’s will.” In other words, you will no longer pass the junior minister to the devil in order to “test” him: the test has already been passed and the error has already been corrected. Moreover, the younger brother can become a blogger and declare your sin to the whole world.

By the way, why did God have the clergy establish their “control” over all? It’s like a stretched thread, which, if overdone, breaks completely and will not be stretched anymore. So I came out completely out of control: why stay under control, if control prevents you from doing something useful. It is reasonable to come out of control. The control was established by God in order for me to go out from under it.

And what would I do in the place of Bishop Edward? I would leave the post if necessary (or maybe I would not leave), because anyway, someone else could take this post and join me. One of the reasons: God intercedes for the offended, and he seriously offended me in the past. Better not go against God. Has not God exalted you for this day?

And how exactly did Edward do his deed? After the blows with a frying pan, I can’t remember exactly (maybe specifically so that Edward could not be judged by an ordinary criminal court), but as I remember, he violated the signed contract by which I could preach in a certain church building, and using physical force forced me out of this building, as a result of which I lost my salary and almost died of starvation. Or was it not? Can’t remember exactly. Maybe he did it somehow differently, but the insult took place.