“all is conrolled by money”
(Ec. 10:19) “…money is the answer for everything.”
It is a well known mathematical fact [TODO: exact formulation and a reference] that “efficiency” [or non-effificiency?] of markets is equivalent to solvability of P=NP – answering all questions answers to that can be checked.
Also https://chatgpt.com/s/t_6952eddb96648191a0904a348d298e41 explains that the internal throughts of a subject, if we have no telepathy can be assessed only by his using of money (or a similar numberic values like tokens).
A Chrsitian can conclude from this that love is defined by a subject’s use of money, not for exampe by hugs or flattering words.
Love as the desire to grow. If wants and can, then does (axiom)
Jesus said that His disciples would rejoice hearing that He goes to the Father if loved Him. For Jesus, as the Son of God, going to the Father means spiritual growth (infinite becoming the same as the Father).
So, love means desiring somebody to become greater.
If you both want and can, you do. (This can be taken as an axiom defining “want” and “can”.) If you love somebody, you want (and possibly can) give him/her money (or something other measuable). Simple as that. If you don’t give, you don’t love.
Just as a criterion of salvation
The NT says that “unfair don’t inherit the kingdom of heaven.
To be just means to have the same measure for others’ success as for your own success. If the measure for player’s i success if v_i, then your measure needs to be modified to become f(v_0, …, v_n) where f is a symmetric (increasing) function. If you measure of success (“payoff function”) is something other, you don’t inherit the kingdom of heaven.
I don’t know the Trump’s internal measure whether it conforms to this our “procrustean bed” to enter the heaven), but many of his followers go to the hell with varaints of America first not conforming to this.
Christ vs Mammon. Not believing in money
In the heaven there are two burses: Mammon and Christ.
Our bank accounts are a part of Mammon. If we believe that the sum in the bank is true, then you serve to Mammon and can’t serve to Christ and are destined to the hell.
Infinite greed:
on advices
on subscriptions
Greed is the division of the sum people give to its social benefit.
People’s infinite greed (and any injustice, not just infinite one, is incompatible with salvation, as I wrote before) is manifested through:
- refusal to pay me for ordered semicategory actions (OSA) publication: a 1,000,000 greed
- refusing to give an advice for free, when the receiver can’t pay (infinity greed)
- refusing product subscription for free, when the potential subscriber can’t pay
Of course, it is not that simple: There may be no way to check whether a potential subscriber has enough money.
No mankind is in deadlock: I have an offense on every of you that you didn’t pay for my OSA publication and most, if not all, of you are to go to the hell.
Given the above, the only way to remove my offence is to pay my money. But you cannot because you have no intrinstic desire to pay, but only extrinsic desire to pay in order to avoid the hell for you, what as you know since Martin Luther does not work.
Family pride and overusing rights
Another set of principles closing entering to heaven, often framed as a famlly buiness, is taking every right that you have, not only these that you really need. This is often exposed in abuse of poor people, such as losing an employee (such as by death from hunger) contrary to your own benefit by not paying forward.
Leave a Reply