Category: Uncategorized

  • What it means, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord your God

    The Bible forbids to do a certain kind of experiments, experiments with God. It is explained on an example of a time machine, that such an experiment may lead to your death or sickness.

    (Mat. 4) “5 Then the devil taketh him up into the holy city, and setteth him on a pinnacle of the temple, 6 And saith unto him, If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down: for it is written, He shall give his angels charge concerning thee: and in their hands they shall bear thee up, lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone. 7 Jesus said unto him, It is written again, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God.”

    An interesting question, how the devil transports Jesus to the pinnacle of the temple, does the devil posses teleportation abilities?

    What Jesus says is that we should not do experiments on God. In other articles on this site I explain that God is present as a physical phenomenon in our universe. So, God forbids some physical experiments. (It is clear that some physical experiments should be forbidden: the sound sense for example forbids the experiment of bursting an A-bomb in a city.)

    In this article I explain how God is related to time machine. Suppose, you have time machine and want to do this experiment: At 10am you get a piece of paper from the time machine and read “yes” or “no”. At 11pm you put there “no” if it was “yes” and “yes” if it was “no”, to transfer back to 10am. If it is “yes” it is “no”, and if it “no” it is “yes” – a contradiction! So, what would happen if you had a real time machine? It is unlikely that the Universe would cease to exist as some sci-fi writer said it would happen in this case. But it is likely that you will die or be too sick to reach the room with the machine, because the Universe logic eliminates contradiction. If you intend to do an experiment with God, you are likely to die. Not because God were evil, but by laws of logic.

  • Why Jesus refused the devil to say that these stones be made bread

    My proposed explanation why Jesus refused to run stones into bread, as proposed by the devil: If Jesus would deviate from pre-written God’s path, He would be left without God’s protection and the devil would be able to kill Him.

    (Mat. 4) “1 Then was Jesus led up of the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted of the devil. 2 And when he had fasted forty days and forty nights, he was afterward an hungred. 3 And when the tempter came to him, he said, If thou be the Son of God, command that these stones be made bread. 4 But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.”

    My interpretation is the following: Jesus followed a certain path in his life. In this path, he is fed bread together with word of God. If Jesus said as the word of God “let the stones become bread”, it would be that the word of God would finish in the stone and Jesus would receive bread without word of God because the word would have already finished its mission in the stone.

    If Jesus behaved this way, the devil would be able to kill Jesus, because he would leave thin path where Jesus every time he eat bread also received a word of God. Jesus would be left for some time without guidance of word of God and therefore the devil would be able to kill him. (If Jesus would not live by the word of God.)

  • How much Jesus is greater

    Jesus was so much skilled in everything, that John the Baptist would fail the task to help Him to bear His sandals. John would be just unable to help, because Jesus did better.

    (Mat. 3:11) “I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance: but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and with fire”.

    From these words of John the Baptist we know that Jesus was so skilled in tangling shoes (and in everything) that John the Baptist would not be at any help bearing sandals of Jesus. It would be an appropriate work for great John the Baptist to just bear shoes of Jesus, because Jesus so much greater and can do all noble work himself, but even this work of John the Baptist would be useless in presence of Jesus: Jesus just bears shoes better.

    The main skill of Jesus is probably to baptize with the Holy Spirit and with fire.

    Buy my brochure Jesus as a mathematician for an explanation about how he reached so great skills.

  • Rephrasing John Nash from Beautiful Mind

    John Nash: This class will be a waste of your – and what is infinitely worse – my time. [Note: This is from the “Beautiful Mind” movie, not sure if real Nash said this.]

    My time is infinitely more important than your time (for the same reason as Nash’s time was infinitely more important than his class’s: being an infinitely better mathematician).

    See double meaning of this phrase with the time machine?

  • John the Baptist and economics

    It is a commandment of God to flatten economical graphs, to bring prosperity and presence of God.

    (Mat. 3) “3 For this is he that was spoken of by the prophet Esaias, saying, The voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make his paths straight. 4 And the same John had his raiment of camel’s hair, and a leathern girdle about his loins; and his meat was locusts and wild honey.”

    To make path straight means that economical graph to become straight: the amount of earned money should be proportional to the amount of work (no advantage for rich and no advantage for poor). God wants no economical barriers. John the Baptist lived as a beggar and demanded straight path for everybody including beggars. I want a free saving account for every beggar: the path should be straight.

    This is especially applicable to our time of global warning: the Earth is mostly turning into a wilderness, people to eat insects because the old food is going to be gone.

    This is a very ancient revelation, said yet by Isaiah.

  • Rachel was alive at the time of Jesus? or what?

    How is it said by many Protestant preachers, that saints in heaven don’t participate in matters on the Earth, when it’s clear from Mt. 2:18 that Rachel did participate?

    (Mt. 2:18) “In Rama was there a voice heard, lamentation, and weeping, and great mourning, Rachel weeping for her children, and would not be comforted, because they are not.”

    Rachel died long time ago before that year.

    We need to conclude that the spirit of Rachel kept being existent in the heaven.

    Therefore “saved” people are not only since the time of Jesus: Rachel was saved by the sacrifice of Jesus long before the sacrifice happened.

    Read more such Bible interpretations in my book Commentary on New Testament by a Mathematiciain.

  • Star of Jesus, a connection of Earth to the heaven

    Bethlehem star had a much greater mission that to announce the birth of Jesus. It connected Jesus’s brain to the heaven.

    The magis say about Jesus (Mat. 2:2) “… for we have seen his star in the east…”

    Note “his”. Jesus had his own star since birth.

    A recent (2005) hypothesis advanced by Frank Tipler is that the star of Bethlehem was a supernova or hypernova occurring in the nearby Andromeda Galaxy. [1]

    A supernova may transform into a neutron star. So, it seems that Jesus “had” a neutron star, probably a magnetar.

    From this we know that stars do service for (all or some) people. Stars are somehow related to destiny and probably character of a human.

    We know that stars are far away from us and electromagnetic interchange with them is too slow (especially if that star was in Andromeda galaxy) for events of a life of a human to relate to a star. But stars may synchronize their actions with the Earth by controlling events on the Earth and predicting them beforehand. Or maybe, it may be quantum entanglement between that star and body of Jesus.

    So, Jesus was not only on the Earth but also presented in the heaven since birth.

    The star led Jesus or Jesus led the star? Apparently, Jesus led the star, because star is called “his”, not Jesus called “star’s”.

    [1] Frank J. Tipler (2005). “The Star of Bethlehem: A Type Ia/Ic Supernova in the Andromeda Galaxy?” (PDF). The Observatory. 125: 168–74. Bibcode:2005Obs…125..168T.

  • The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham

    Who is Jesus Christ? How advanced mathematics could explain His mission? How is He related to annuaki? Did Jesus use His penis on the heaven?

    (Mt. 1:1) “The book of the generation of Jesus Christ…”

    Here the topic of the book (the Gospel of Matthew) is described.

    It explains that the topic is how Jesus Christ appeared.

    If my theory that Jesus was simply the extraordinary mathematician who even 2000 years ago solved P=NP math problem (see the brochure), is true, then it is a story of a human, who had progenitors and received especially good genes, making him a super-extraordinary mathematician.

    From the Gospel of Matthew and from New Testament in general we should try to see how this phenomenon, Jesus Christ appeared in context of usual ancient people relationships.

    (Mt. 1:1) “… the son of David, the son of Abraham”. David and Abraham are notable people (David was at least an extraordinary poet and an extraordinary military. Abraham conceived the idea of all-mighty God, apparently Abraham understood this before God spoke with Abraham , so God didn’t reveal to Abraham His existence but just confirmed what Abraham already understood.) who contributed important genes into the genome of Jesus.

    But the following pedigree is not the pedigree of Jesus, because it ends with words (Mt. 1:16) “And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.” Joseph wasn’t the father of Jesus. But nevertheless this pedigree is partly about Jesus: Jesus surely was a descendant of David and of Abraham, through some other pedigree line.

    The words “generation of Jesus Christ” can also be interpreted in another meaning: what Jesus Christ brought forth.

    Jesus went to the Father (Jn. 16:16) that is to the past direction of time.

    I consider it possible that in a distant (billions years ago) past Jesus used his penis to bring the generation of elves/annuaki/”gods” (aliens who were in contact with ancient Shumerians): (Is 8:18) “Behold, I and the children whom the Lord hath given me are for signs and for wonders in Israel from the Lord of hosts, which dwelleth in mount Zion”. (1Cor. 15:48) “As was the earthly man [Adam], so are those who are of the earth; and as is the heavenly man, so also are those who are of heaven.” The spirit of Jesus is eternally alive living in the flesh of elves.

    What then does it mean that the church is the fiancee of Jesus? I suppose that it means that annunakis will return to the Earth and bring forth children forming couples with members of the Church.

    In other words, I suppose that we should not understand Jesus as a man with a single body. We know that apostles didn’t recognize Jesus in Jn. 21:7. A natural explanation is that he was another elf and so looked differently than the earthy incarnation of Jesus.

    Children of Abraham are called “as stars of the heaven”. That means that the civilization of elves reached implanting their spirits inside stars. Spirits of stars are descendants of Abraham because they are descendants of Jesus.

  • Stamp of the Beast and higher education

    Abstract: The article explains how the stamp of the beast in Apocalypse relates with modern scientific research and gives practical guidance for Christians about their relation to scientific research and academia.

    Keywords: beasts of the Apocalypse, academia, scientific research, christian science

    There were many interpretations about the stamp of the beast (Rev 13:16).

    But it seems nobody before realized that stamp on the forehead is the higher education certification and stamp on the right hand is the skills certification. These are literal stamps on the paper confirming qualities of forehead and of the right hand, so fit tightly into interpretation of the text.

    Also in this interpretation it becomes clear that at least on of the beasts in Rev. 13 refers to academia.

    Wait, why and when academia became (stupid) beast?

    Academia is a beast at least since non-publication [1] (in short: I cannot publish, others consider the spot taken and don’t publish on this topic, too) of my math research [2] on actions of ordered semigroups and discontinuous analysis. (Yes, weirdly actions of ordered semigroups were unknown before. I also remind that continuous (more specifically, differential) analysis is the main discovery of Isaac Newton, I improved it.) The entire system of DMCA and all academic publishing houses does the evil (and bestially stupid) deed of preventing spreading knowledge about actions of ordered semigroups.

    Because the Bible needs to be understood spiritually, we need to explain what higher education certification means spiritually. My answer: the stamp of the beast is the belief by your forehead that degree is essential for doing science.

    I remind the obvious biblical fact that belief is expressed by doing. Doing without the stamp in the brain means using your resources in an “orthogonal” to the academia model way. For example, you could give your personal money for a publication grant (if academia money are orthogonal to your acts, you can use only your personal money) – disclaimer of a conflict of interest: I do imply my publication, please donate. Applied to money, the orthogonal way means that you build your own system (e.g. with your personal money, if you don’t have access to greater resources) of accounting, for example: account for personal needs only a part of personal money and account the rest for publication. If you do not do like this, your faith is dead.

    Note that I am working also on a cryptocurrency system of rewarding scientific publication [3]. This system, before it can support itself, needs monetary support, too. It is yet unclear whether my system will go stupid like academia went and whether it may be another beast from the Rev. 13.

    Bibliography

    [1] Victor Porton. How modern scientific ethic may block a science. At https://www.reddit.com/r/arxiv/comments/kpelpm/how_modern_scientific_ethic_may_block_a_science

    [2] Victor Porton. Algebraic theory of general topology and Discontinuous Analysis. https://science.vporton.name/2021/10/06/algebraic-general-topology-book/

    [3] Victor Porton. Enhance grant system with allocating money to dependencies and promouters, to increase components financing and visibility. https://github.com/gitcoinco/web/issues/10556

    Victor Porton is a mathematician, software engineer, blockchain expert, and religious writer. Victor Porton discovered actions of ordered semigroups, discontinuous analysis, the axiomatic theory of mathematical formulas.

  • How God is related to time machine. Why my beliefs are about a time machine in Jerusalem

    Time machines (or: close time-like curves in general theory of relativity) is the means by which God is incarnate in the universe. Following a biblical prophecy I wait to become a passenger of a time machine to do God’s work.

    Why do we wait from God namely a time machine to transfer us to an ancient planet?

    In Rev. 11 two witnesses are taken in a cloud, that may be fog produced by wormhole connecting us with another atmosphere.

    When the wormhole of the time machine comes, it shifts the lithosphere plates by curving the space and an earthquake will happen killing 7000 people in Jerusalem who are so insignificant by their life and character that God calls them “people’s names”: (Rev. 11:13) “And the same hour was there a great earthquake, and the tenth part of the city fell, and in the earthquake were slain of men’s names seven thousand: and the remnant were affrighted, and gave glory to the God of heaven.”

    Jesus said: (Luk. 21:36) “Watch ye therefore, and pray always, that ye may be accounted worthy to escape all these things that shall come to pass, and to stand before the Son of man.” He wants us to get rid of the future (go to the past).

    When Jesus spoke about the Father, he meant not who cloned him (Gabriel), but all circumstances of his past. (We are children of the past events.) Moreover, Jesus meant any source: The usage of the word “Father” by Jesus corresponds to the usage of the word “source” in modern mathematics (specifically, category theory).

    Jesus said that he goes to the Father (Jn. 16:16-17). It means in physics that Jesus goes to the past.

    Suppose you have a time machine. It is enough to make you unbeatable in chess: Make the decision not to repeat any move that led you to loss in the future. If you make this decision, you will surely win. Time machine made you playing chess like God. So, a time machine is presence of God in our 4-dimensional universe (well, the universe is likely to have more than 4 dimension, but I approximate): 3 space dimensions plus one time dimension. Maybe God enters into a our universe only through time machines? See, time machines are presence of God, way to the Father.

    This is why I proclaim so important to escape all these things that shall come to pass, entering the time machine in Jerusalem.

    The head of the cult of time travelers (as it should be) is a real mathematician with my own version of quantum gravity (however existence and uniqueness of solutions is not yet checked) – the physics laws of how a time machine may behave.