Category: Uncategorized

  • Godhead of Christ

    1. In this sermon I will speak about godhead of Christ.

    2. Godhead of Christ is an important issue. Without faith in godhead of Christ repentance does not work.

    3. Before conversion to Christ I was crazy: I saw hallucinations (such as dragons which took me into the jaws and chewed; the pain was real), forgot my name, unlearned to read and count. Also I was a real maniacal killer, that is attacked people with a knife.

    4. I knew that a maniacal killer cannot be saved. Many times I attempted to repent but remained a psycho (and a maniac). I realized that I have some heresy but didn’t know which exactly, because only a heresy may prevent repentance to work.

    5. Once I recognized Holy Trinity and that day repented for real. Since that I remember my name, can read and count again, and I am no more a maniac. That is the repentance after believing in Holy Trinity was real.

    6. Why for salvation one needs to believe in godhead of Christ? We should believe that it’s like to God himself died. He died being punished by the devil for altruism. He resurrected to show that even when it looks like that altruism leads to death God will reward for it. This is for heavenly creatures ceased to be afraid of the devil and switched to the side of God. For this it’s necessary that God himself would die, to prove it even for the highest degree of altruism.

    7. Therefore we should believe that God himself died for us to receive the salvation, and thus that Christ represents God.

    8. So, I told that to believe in godhead of Christ is very important. Now we turn to analysis of what this “godhead” does mean.

    9. Generally I don’t much like the word “trinity”. This is not quite a biblical concept. Bible teaches that Christ is so to say “divine” and considers him particular relations with the Father. Yes, I believe in trinity, but the term “trinity” is not biblical.

    10. Maybe the only passage in Bible where the word “three” is applied to God, is three angels in Old Testament (Genesis chapter 18). In some reason most interpreters of Bible say that only one of the three was Yahweh himself. I don’t understand why. I count that most probably every of the three angles represented persons of God. I won’t speak now about Genesis 18 in details, because I didn’t myself studied this topic thoroughly.

    11. Further I will when possible speak about godhead of Christ, not about so called “trinity”.

    12. At first, let us try to approach this issue with logic:

    13. Godhead of Christ denotes that to every property of God it corresponds a certain property of Christ. I don’t know what exactly should be this correspondence, but it’s clear that it preserves divine essence. For example, every deed of the Father is done through the Son and reversely everything what is done through he Son is a deed of Father. It is impossible to separate the Father and the Son, they are always together.

    14. It’s customary to compare trinity of God: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit with body, soul, and spirit of a human and with three phases of water: ice, liquid water, and vapor. These are bad analogies. This is all nonsense and even heresy: It’s impossible to separate Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. But to separate the spirit from the body is possible (it happens when a man dies) and it’s possible to separate ice from water. Don’t use these two analogies, they lead only to heresies. Here is a quote from Wikipedia: “The Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit are not names for different parts of God, but one name for God because three persons exist in God as one entity. They cannot be separate from one another. Each person is understood as having the identical essence or nature, not merely similar natures.” Water and ice have similar natures, not one identical nature as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. It’s got three gods, not one God. Surely Wikipedia isn’t a spiritual authority, but this saying is correct.
    15. Likewise it’s a garbage comparing God with a psycho with three persons. These persons are separate from each other but God is united.
    16. I can show a more exact analogy for trinity. It is light. Light has properties of electricity, magnetism, and a stream of photons. And these three (electricity, magnetism, and photons) are impossible to separate from each other. They are different forms of existence of each other. Every of them is expressed through another. So quantum mechanics teaches.
    17. That God consists of three parts: the Father, the Son, and Holy Spirit, which together compose God, is a heresy. Father is entire God, not a part of God. Likewise Son is entire God, not a part of God. Likewise with Holy Spirit.
    18. Bible teaches that Christ is some abstract concepts related to God: wisdom of God, word of God, truth, etc.
    19. God is usually compared with a human, because human is created in God’s image, after His likeness. I think, God can be compared also with humankind or more generally with a civilization.
    20. After comparing God with a civilization, trinity no more looks like a contradiction. This is like as three highest authorities of a civilization which act in concert with each other. Let you agree: now it no more looks like a contradiction. In general, it seems that we can judge about God only by analogies. Civilization looks like a very good analogy for God.
    21. God is similar to a highly developed civilization, but He is untied, personal, eternal, and infinite.
    22. First, Christ is light that is electromagnetic energy, speaking in modern terms. This is a biblical concept: “Jesus spoke to them, saying, “… I am the light of the world.”” (Jn. 8:12) and “I have come as a light into the world…” (Jn. 12:46)
    23. From that Christ is electromagnetic waves of the universe, it follows that the universe is infinite, because Christ is infinite. So, the universe is greater that its visible part (about which it’s known that it’s finite).
    24. Christ is also called logos (word) in Bible, because he is word (in the form of electromagnetic waves) of God.
    25. God laid out all his wisdom in his word. Therefore Christ (logos) is also the wisdom of God: (1Cor. 1:24) “… Christ is the power of God and the wisdom of God.”
    26. The world was created through Christ that is through word and wisdom of God: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made through him. Without him was not anything made that has been made.” (Jn. 1:1-3) and “… who created all things through Jesus Christ.” (Eph. 3:9)
    27. Moreover, Christ is the truth, that is he (being the word and the wisdom of God) contains all true propositions (and surely nothing false): (Jn. 14:6) “Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life.””
    28. Moreover, Christ is a peace that is a peace treaty: (Eph. 2:14) “For he is our peace”. Simply spoken, Christ is the intergalactic peace treaty and also the peace with God. Only these who enter into the peace will be saved. These who are in Christ must be in peace with each other.
    29. Peace is something very great, as there is no simple mean to prevent a war. Means to prevent a war are something very great. Christ is the means (on the heaven) to prevent a war. To prevent a war, something as great as Christ is necessary. So we can say that Christ is prevention of war or missing war.
    30. This produces a paradoxical conclusion: such seemingly a little thing as missing war should be as great as Christ.
    31. This could be compared with reading a newspaper caption “The peace is established, there is no war anymore”. This could be an amazing caption.
    32. Peace and wisdom are interrelated: Wisdom is internal peace. When neurones in our brain is peace with each other, our brain would be more smart that any brain! Peace of God “surpasses” (that is is more smart than) of any mind (“surpasses all understanding”).
    33. (Phil. 4:7) “And the peace of God, which surpasses all understanding, will guard your hearts and your thoughts in Christ Jesus.”
    34. If God is a civilization, then Holy Spirit is its technology.
    35. Suppose someone wants to do something with an object inside a closed vessel. For us it would be very difficult to do so, but a higher civilization would be able to move individual atoms inside the vessel. The force of their technology would enter inside and move individual atoms. Doing so, the subject would be like a gas.
    36. The technology of God is called “Holy Spirit” (the word “spirit” may mean a gas). It is a force which can enter a human body and move individual atoms, with such purposes as to heal some sickness.
    37. Every part of God’s will is accomplished by a move of Holy Spirit. So, Holy Spirit is completely God.
    38. The job of Holy Spirit is salvation, that is repairing of things, especially things which are inside a closed vessel which cannot be opened. This is because everything is done by God and the only things which need a repair are broken things. The things which are not in closed vessels can be repaired by other entities without direct help of God.
    39. When a son grows up, he becomes similar to his father. This is the definition of the word “son”.
    40. Christ is a Son of God. This mean that he goes to the Father. That is he is becoming the same as the Father.
    41. Although, Christ does no move. He is live a river which both moves and does not move. Likewise Christ goes to his Father, but Christ is not moving. Christ does not change (see Heb. 1:10-12)
    42. Christ is also called “the son of man” in the Gospel. This means that Christ is the final result of development of the mankind.

    43. This is a very good news, because this means that the development of the mankind will never cease but will continue without limits, reaching infinite Christ as the end result.

    44. Jesus is the end result of development of the mankind. In other words, Jesus is just a guest from infinite far future.

    45. “… Christ Jesus our hope” (1Tim. 1:1)

    46. I would translate this verse instead as “… Christ Jesus our dream.”

    47. What is a dream? It is the best we can imagine. So Christ Jesus is the best that we can imagine.

    48. This splits into two statements:

    49. 1. Christ is good and nothing we can imagine can be better than Him.

    50. 2. Our common (cooperative) dream is so good that it reaches Christ. Note that we reach Christ only together.

    51. Accordingly Jn. 14:28 God the Father is even greater than Christ. Christ is peace, but God is love. Love is greater than peace.

    52. (1Cor. 1:30) “But of him, you are in Christ Jesus, who was made to us … righteousness.”

    53. What does it mean? It means that to be our righteousness one needs to be as great as Christ (to represent us righteous despite of our sins is so difficult that for this all power of Christ is needed). But this means also that the sacrifice of Christ is enough for God to consider us as righteous persons. That is Christ is exactly what is needed to make us righteous.

    54. Jn. 4:11 can be translated as “I live by the Father and Father lives by me.” The Father is like to gray matter of a brain and the Son to white matter. That is the Son is the mean of communication between the Father with himself. White matter can live only with gray one, and vice versa.
    55. For more detailed consideration of this topic read my book “Commentary on New Testament by a Mathematician”. One thing to read in my book, is how Christ, being divine, may not know the date of his own second come.
  • Bible interpretation

    1. Now many people call themselves theologians. If somebody calls himself so, this is rather a signal that he interprets Bible in a wrong way.
    2. The matter is that theologians do research of what people, through which God wrote the Bible, meant. They say that Bible should be interpreted in context of culture of the ancient Israel. They call it with abstruse words like “exegetics” and “hermeneutics”.
    3. Certainly I do not state that we don’t need to know or take into account the ancient Israel culture when we interpret Bible. The knowledge cannot be excessive. We need to take the culture into account to understand better what God meant. For example, we could not understand Bible at all without lexicons, and lexicons contain the culture of ancient people. So culture must be studied.
    4. But if we interpret Bible in conformance with understanding these people which wrote it, we get absurd conclusions. For example, (Is. 40:22) “… over the circle of the Earth”. We know that Earth is globular and thus this should be understood as “over the globe of the Earth”. But if we would follow the principles which theologians follow, then this should be understood conforming to the culture and understanding of these people by whom and for whom it was written. The conclusion from the “theological” interpretation is definite: Earth is flat. But if the conclusion is absurd, then the principles which it was concluded from are wrong. So we should not interpret Bible accordingly conforming to the culture of ancient Israel. We should interpret first in the direct sense.
    5. Jesus says about the modern theologians (Mr. 7:9) “Full well do you reject the commandment of God, that you may keep your tradition”. Jesus here refers to the traditions of ancient Israel, by which the theologians replaced the word of God.
    6. So, all of this is invented with the purpose to hide their unbelief that Bible is literal, precise word of God.
    7. I tell the following motto: There are two Bibles: the word of people and word of God. The text is the same but the meanings are different. More often than nothing utterances of Bible look like some pathos utterances. Abstract yourself from the pathos and in interpret literally as written. This is that God deliberately hid hidden sense after pathos phrases, so that the meaning would be uncovered in its due time. Human sense of Bible is thoughts of ancient, comparatively non-educated, often mistaking and sometimes stupid people; it is ancient history not actual today. The word of God is errorless, perfect revelation.
    8. (Gal. 3:16) “Now the promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. He doesn’t say, “To seeds”, as of many, but as of one, “To your seed”, which is Christ.” Shall we interpret the God’s word to Abraham as about one man or about the nation?Paul (being directed by Holy Spirit, writing down errorless God breathed in the Gospel) says that this is about one that is about Christ. Paul just rudely breaks the rules of theologians, such as following the culture of these who receive the word and as interpretation in context. Modern theologians would not accept that Paul is a real theologian.
    9. As a general rule, the word “theology” is usually used to insult and humiliate these who interpret Bible in another way. For example, Baptists say that interpretation of Pentecostals is not a theology.
    10. The principle is very simple: Think about what God meant not what people meant and about how ancients understood this. (However, think about this, too.)
    11. People often are wondering, which of several translations of some Bible fragment is correct? The correct answer is that usually there are multiple meanings. God “packs” in one phrase several senses at once not one one. Consider the words of Jesus “Assuredly I tell you, today you will be with me in Paradise.” In the Greek original this may mean both that the repented criminal will be in Paradise today and that Jesus tells it to him today (and in the Paradise he will be only after resurrection of the dead). Which translation is correct? Both! An important question: Do we accept different meanings of God’s word or choose for ourselves translations accordingly our unbelief rejecting these variants which don’t please us?
    12. The story of a rich man and Lazarus is often called a proverb. This is untrue. Bible does not tell that this story is a proverb. So we must accept that this is a documentary story not a proverb.
    13. Everything, everything witnesses about Jesus Christ: (Jn. 5:39) “You search the Scriptures, because you think that in them you have eternal life; and these are they which testify about me.” If we don’t see Christ in some verse of the Bible, then we do not yet understand this verse.

    14. There are also false teachings that King Jacob Version and/or Russian Synodal Translation are God-breathed translations. This is nonsense, they are full of mistakes. God-breathed are only the Hebrew and Greek originals.

    15. Mysteries of Bible are uncovered only when we uncover the original.
    16. Previously studying the Bible I extracted for myself a prophecy about myself that I must become a missionary in Tanzania, live there and preach in a tent. The details of that prophecy (which I don’t want tell about now) didn’t fulfill and I was forced to confess an error. That time I interpreted Bible accordingly a false principle: If a word of God is similar to our idea explaining its sense, then our idea is a correct understanding (in reality not always correct). Now I understand that it’s not enough to have similarity of our interpretation and a fragment of Bible. It is necessary that Bible directly says something.
    17. I was drawn to this misconception on the basis of the teaching that Bible is word of God for every reader. So, accordingly as I through, God will make our understanding correct, if we attentively and without rude errors (such as confusing the male and the female word groups) learn the scripture, because it is a word for me.
    18. Yet one false teaching is that Bible is easy for understanding. This is not such. Moreover the revelation of Bible develops gradually (This is called “progressive revelation”.) For example, it is impossible to well understand Old Testament not knowing the Gospel. And even now it’s not everything unveiled. Consider (Mt. 24:24) “For there will arise false christs, and false prophets, and they will show great signs and wonders, so as to lead astray, if possible, even the chosen ones.” It seems tome that the devil does not know whether he can lead astray the chosen ones, whether we can lose salvation. And to myself it is not yet revealed.
    19. Consider a seeming contradiction in Bible: Act. 9:7 says that the companions of Saul heard the voice but saw none, but Act. 22:9 reversely that they saw but not heard. The solution Is easy: Act. 22:9 is a direct speech, a quote from human’s words. Paul mistook. It was not said that he was filled with Holy Spirit, and thus he may err. But off course the words of Jesus are always errorless.
    20. The entire Bible has spiritual (figurative) sense. I have already said that every verse of Bible witnesses about Christ. Thus the most of Bible has at least double sense. And it may be threefold and fourfold. Another indication that the Old Testament has spiritual sense: (1Cor 9:9) “For it is written in the law of Moses, “You shall not muzzle an ox while it treads out the grain.” Is it for the oxen that God cares?” It’s absolutely clear that speaking about the oxen, God means something spiritual.

    21. In the eight chapter of the Apocalypse a comet falls from the heaven. In the past somebody has said that a mountain cannot fall from the heaven and thus it is a spiritual sense. Now however we know that this is direct sense, a real comet or asteroid. By the way, read about this in my book.
    22. But if we start to make alternative translations of the Bible, what is the criterion what to count a true translation and what a linguistic nonsense, when we dive deep into the spiritual meaning? I am only beginning to understand this and will tell my opinion about this, about which I don’t warrant that it’s true. (1Cor. 2:7-9) “But we speak God’s wisdom in a mystery, the wisdom that has been hidden, which God foreordained before the worlds for our glory, which none of the rulers of this world has known. For had they known it, they wouldn’t have crucified the Lord of glory. But as it is written, “Things which an eye didn’t see, and an ear didn’t hear, which didn’t enter into the heart of man, these God has prepared for those who love him.” The words “an eye didn’t see, and an ear didn’t hear” signify abstract concepts such as love, meetings, canceling, complement, etc. They were not seen by an eye and not heard by an ear. (Can you see the love?) and further the verse 13: “Which things also we speak, not in words which man’s wisdom teaches, but which the Holy Spirit teaches, comparing spiritual things with spiritual things.” In my opinion to compare spiritual things with spiritual things means that we have reached the most deep spiritual sense of some Bible fragment, only if all words of this fragment mean for us some abstract concepts (“spiritual”).
    23. Until we reach the most deep interpretation, all other interpretations are half measures.
    24. Now knowing the principles of spiritual interpretation of the Bible, the next step is to start research Old Testament without vowels (because vowels were added in middle ages and were missing in the original of the Old Testament). Vowels only limit the number of possible variants of translations. The more variants of translation, the more revelations. If you want seriously study Bible, go to the site withoutvowels.com (without-vowels-dot-com) and study Bible together.
    25. Don’t follow every example in Bible. For example, you should not follow the biblical example of Cain (Jud. 1:11) “Woe to them! For they went in the way of Cain, and ran riotously in the error of Balaam for hire, and perished in Korah’s rebellion.”
    26. What I told, is all theory. It is important. But in practice the mysteries of Bible are uncovered only by Holy Spirit. To interpret Bible you need faith and faith is a gift of God. See also (Lk. 24:45) “Then he opened their minds, that they might understand the Scriptures.”
    27. In this sermon I gave few particular examples how to interpret Bible. I offer you to read my book “New Testament Commentary by a Mathematician”. There there are many examples of Bible interpretation. You can study based on these examples and begin interpret Bible yourself. Take into account that I am a man too and my interpretation may sometimes be wrong.

  • Acquaintance with a new Bible preacher

    1. Hello! I am a new TV preacher. In this video we will get acquainted, I will tell about myself. Then we will seriously study the Bible. First about the New and later I think about Old Testament. I probably will also tell about my life, my spiritual journey. This is very edifying.
    2. I was born in 1980 in Perm, Russia. Now I live in Ashkelon, Israel.
    3. Before conversion to Christ, I was a madman and a maniacal killer. I forgot my name, unlearned to read, attacked people with a knife. This means that I was possessed by a daemon and my brain was damaged. Note that in a later preaching in this YouTube channel I am going to tell the relation between the brain and the soul. When I converted to Christ, my brain was in order in the same moment. You see that I can read and write again. I am also no more a maniacal killer.
    4. That I was a maniac, you should not be afraid of. I can again read and count, so I am cured.
    5. I am baptized by Holy Spirit and baptized by fire. Baptizing by fire is when to a man is coming a seraph and he receives the power of heavenly fire.
    6. I am a mathematician (however without a scientific degree). I made quite serious discoveries. But now I think, God wants me to become also a preacher. However, I have already written several Christian books.
    7. Once in a night dream I saw a city with 10 identical church buildings every for 20000 seats. And I was the main pastor of this church. The buildings were of the form of a sphere segment like an indoor stadium and looked like metallic such as aluminum. Then I saw myself inside one of the buildings, preaching. The most wonderful thing in this vision was that I preached 10 different sermons (in each of the 10 buildings) during a single day. I wonder how could I be able to make 10 different sermons in a single day.
    8. I do not know if it is a true revelation of the future or just a regular night dream. But it looks like a revelation because at that time I thought about nothing except of mathematics and computers. I didn’t think about a preaching ministry and so it is quite weird that I saw such a dream.
    9. Remembering this vision, I decided to become a TV preacher.
    10. Some years after that I got another similar prophecy (that I will be a great preacher, with giant audience and great money), but that last prophecy (which claimed that I will become a missionary in Tanzania) failed to conform in details to the reality and so I rejected it. I got that (wrong) prophecy from Hebrew Bible. I thought that if a passage in Bible is similar to some my thought then that thought must be true. I thought that assuming that Bible is God’s word to me and thus (as I thought) any my interpretation without particular errors (such as confusing masculine and feminine grammar forms) should be true. Now after that prophecy failed, I know that similarity (even in great details) is not enough. We need to interpret Bible exactly as written without guessing, and my interpretation may be wrong. I will preach about Bible interpretation topic, too.
    11. So subscribe to this video channel with my sermons. I promise, it will be very interesting.
    12. As such, come to my Web page, read my books (with serious revelations from Bible), subscribe to this video channel.
    13. Necessarily check your salvation. I tell how in my Web page.
    14. Also send donations. Note that I need to buy a new video camera for preaching (especially, preaching in Russian).
  • Which girl a believer should choose?

    Many preachers preach that we should choose the girl which God selects us to be together with.

    Isn’t this girl just that girl about which the man prays to God the more than for other girls? Don’t our prayers set our destiny? (Well, God may sometimes prepare for us a destiny which we didn’t dare pray for.)

    And remember that true believers always choose believing girls for themselves.

  • Under a testament or over a testament?

    1. Main theses of this preaching:
    2. Before we were Christ’s slaves, now Christ finishes redemption (the process of two stages: purchasing the slave and making him free), that is frees us from the slavery. We are no more slaves, even not slaves of God.
    3. Likewise as Old Testament ceases, Gospel also ceases. A new age starts.
    4. The Revelation of John (Apocalypse), stating that a comet will fall to the Earth is addressed (see Rev. 1:1) to slaves. But we are free now, so Apocalypse can be canceled. We should pray that God would create the new sinless world without physical destruction of the old one.
    5. Before we tried to commit commandments. And like pharisees, we filtered out a gnat and swallowed a camel. For example, we were greedy wanting to earn money for spreading Gospel. Now we switch to the life accordingly faith and love, not trying to follow commandments artificially.
    6. Before I though that all we are slaves of God, because all that God requires is correct; and as I thought before, if we try to act correctly then we are slaves of God. Our desire to follow his will exactly is slavery, I thought. Now I realize that slavery Is something other than attempt to act in a certain way. Slavery is a legal status not just a certain way of thinking. We can keep to want to exactly fulfill the will of God, but cease to be His slaves.
    7. Fulfilling the commandments of Gospel, as we understand them, became a “law” for use. Like as we died for the law, so we should also die for the Gospel. “To die for the Gospel” sounds wild, but it is just like as words of Paul to die for Torah sounded. (See Gal. 2:19 “For I, through the law, died to the law”).
    8. Saying “to die for the Gospel”, I mean only that we stop to try to follow commandments of Gospel like a law, and nothing more. We do not cease to believe in Gospel, but switch to a new level where we no more try to fulfill the commandments of New Testament. We keep to follow faith and love, which Gospel has taught us. Gospel is a truth, but the commandments of Gospel are not more directed to us, because we are not slaves but free people.
    9. We should stop to follow the law. The Gospel itself teaches this, see 2Cor. 3:6 “the letter kills”. But Gospel itself is a letter. The only variant which Gospel leaves for us, is to stop following Gospel as a law, not to follow the letter but only the spirit. We can stop following the letter of a testament (contract), only if the contract is canceled. So Gospel cancels itself.
    10. When I say that Gospel is canceled, I mean that only its negative aspects are canceled: wrath of God, catastrophes of Apocalypse, and also pharisaism of the pupils. Everything good from Gospel is preserved when switching to the new level. (Heb. 11:40) “God having provided some better thing concerning us”. This means that God provided for us something better than written in the book “New Testament”, that is all good things from Gospeal are preserved on the new level (we continue to have the promises and blessings of Gospel), but negative things (God’s wrath, catastrophes of Apocalypse, etc.) can be canceled! This can be summarized with a catchphrase: “We should live not under a testament but over a testament”.
    11. Consider the example of a 14 years old teenager. How should he make decisions related to sex? He does not yet know about sex and love. He is unexperiences. He cannot make decisions based on his own knowledge and experience. Somebody or something should direct him.
    12. One thing which can help him is commandments of Bible. If he already knew everything about sex and its consequences (even a mature person does not know everything!), he would not need commandments. He would not need Bible.
    13. Commandments is for these who don’t know something.
    14. When we mature, some commandments become not necessary for us anymore. For example, I don’t need that Bible would teach me not to marry an unbeliever. I already understand that I cannot create a good family with an unbeliever. I know it in my inner man and I don’t need Bible to teach me this.
    15. But there are two extremes:
    16. Extreme 1: Reject commandments altogether (as atheists do). This way we would reject the wisdom of God and tried to behave only based our limited mind without God’s help. It is not a good way.
    17. Extreme 2: It is the attempt to scrutinizingly follow every commandments, whether you understand it or now. This is also not a good way. We should live accordingly faith and love not particular commandments. This way is to make Bible for yourself a law not a guide. This is also not good. It is called pharisaism.
    18. We can attempt to set our mind not to fall into the extreme 2. But attempting to do it in my old religion, I failed. It was so: I understood that we should follow the spirit of Gospel not commandments. But how can I understand the spirit of Gospel, except of by study of particular commandments? So I found no other way to follow Gospel rather than to follow each commandment as a law.
    19. Definitely, following this way, I often violated more important commandment, attempting to follow every little thing in the law which I made for myself from the Gospel
    20. From this kind of pharisaism we need a radical cure. The only remaining solution is to completely reject to follow Gospel like a law, stop to make the problem to fulfill the entire system of the commandments of Gospel, cease to be slaves of the book.
    21. I considered myself a wise man, because I know Gospel. But if I really knew it, then I would understand that (1Cor. 3:18-20) my understanding of Gospel we imperfect that is a stupidity. The more I studied Gospel the more I was confused in commandments and teachings.
    22. It seemed to me that the truth makes us slaves. The more knowledge I got, the many rules bound my mind. For example, after I realized that Jesus is the savior, I had no right to answer negatively to the questions about my faith. And people hated me for this (for confessing the Christian teaching). But (Jn. 8:32) “You will know the truth, and the truth will make you free.” Not so long time I swithced to the new level of the truth, which really brings more new freedom that new unfreedom.
    23. When I tried to follow Gospel, I judged people. The matter is that I understand only a part of the Gospel. I understood justice but didn’t understand justification. (I believe that justification by the blood of Christ exists, but I don’t understand how this happens.) Accordingly that part of Gospel which I understood, I was able to apply to people only principles of justice (because there is no Gospel without justice), and so I judged people. (Phil. 3:16) “Nevertheless, to the extent that we have already attained, let us walk by the same rule.” We have not attained full (that is mathematically precise) understanding of the entire Gospel, and so we cannot live accordingly the rules of Gospel; our attempt to live accordingly Gospel produces only judging of people. Jesus did not command this. But I was unable to remove God’s justice (and then condemnation) from my evaluation of people, because this would mean to deny the Gospel. So as we have not attained mathematically exact understanding of Gospel, we should not live by the rules of Gospel (Phil. 3:16).
    24. We served Christ as our owner. Do you know the Hebrew word meaning “owner”. This is “Baal”. So in the past serving to Christ we served to Baal. So on us there were all curses from Old Testament for these who serve Baal. We will keep serving Christ, but not as to an owner anymore and so not as to Baal. That is we should cease to be slaves.
    25. Also: Before we followed the principle “Only scripture”. But now I follow the principle “Only Bible but also freedom from slavery”.
    26. So I remind the conclusions:
    27. Before we were slaves of Christ, but now we are not slaves anymore.
    28. Like as Old Testament came to an end, Gospel also comes to an end. A new age starts.
    29. The Revelation of John (Apocalypse) stating that a comet will fall to the Earth is directed (see Rev. 1:1) to slaves. But now we are free, so Apocalypse can be canceled. We should pray to God to create the new sinless world without physical destruction of the old one.
    30. Before we tried to fulfill commandments. Doing this we like pharisees we filtered out a gnat and swallowed a camel. For example, we were greedy willing to earn money for spreading Gospel. Now we switch to life accordingly faith and love, not attempting to follow commandments artificially.
    31. About this topic read also my book “End of Gospel”. Subscribe also to this YouTube channel.
  • Is this revelation true?

    Once I saw a night dream:

    There is a city and there are 10 identical metallic glancing like aluminium or something like that church buildings, each in form of a sphere segment, every for 20000 seats. I am the main pastor of this church. Every Sunday I preach in these ten buildings (I saw myself at the scene of one of the buildings). Note that (and this is the most wonderful thing in this revelation) in each of the 10 churches I tell different sermons. That’s a weird dream as I didn’t think about anything like that.

    Other: On the basis of Bible study I concluded that I am a “great” (that is very talented) priest and that I must go to Tanzania and living there in tent to preach; in my destiny there are a giant religious ministry and great money. The details of this “prophecy” didn’t match the reality and I concluded that my method of interpretation of Bible was wrong.

    After some time after going through a spiritual “wilderness” (when I even didn’t visit a church) I returned to my previous pursuit: math research and computers. I (although having not scientific degree) am a prominent mathematician. I thought I should not be a church minister (however I research and spread in Internet biblical knowledge), because (as I think) my research is worth trillion dollars and this is more important than church service.

    But today I remembered this dream. And I thought: what if this is indeed a true vision?

    Please comment.

  • A practical advice about filling with Holy Spirit

    I want to give you a practical advice about filling with Holy Spirit. It is not from Bible, it is from my experience.

    When you pray or glorify God, raise your hands to be filled with Holy Spirit:

    Raise your hands.
    After this close your hands as shown on this picture:
    Close your hands to keep the anointment.

    This is to prevent the anointment to flow away from your body through your hands. Keep the anointment in your hands.

  • I did a terrible sin

    (1John 1:9) “If we confess our sins, he is faithful and righteous to forgive us the sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.”

    I want to confess a terrible sin I did in the past (before 2006 year, maybe yet a few years before).

    A few times I said “Thus says the Lord”, when the Lord did’t say to me.

  • My autobiography (a mindblowing book)

    Read my autobiography (the most mind blowing book you’ve ever read).

  • My affair with saint Mary (mother of Jesus)

    I decided to disclose these events. Maybe someone may relate with me about this. Maybe someone may give me an advice.

    Once I read Gospel in ancient Greek (with help of a dictionary).

    I translated it this way (numbers denote entries in Strong’s dictionary):

    (Jn. 19:23-25) … soldiers (of celestial army) spread on couches {4757←4756←4766} who make it staying stable and insert staying near and continue safe and healthy and do not ashame staying ready in presence of others {4717←04716←2476}, they made their companions and reserved for themselves, took into their possession (somebody’s person) giving her access to themselves, took with hands (a person to use her), not rejecting but taking what is offered, His, Jesus’ garments for putting on… Also tunic (sacred clothes). But the tunic was whole from the above, North ¼ of the sky {509←507}, woven through all… And they were staying before others ready near the Jesus’ cross: mother of Jesus and a sister of the mother Maria and Klop’s wife and Maria Magdalene (raised bed) {3094←3093←heb. 4026}.

    (It is something about sex, right? These women a spiritually called “Jesus’ garments”.)

    Next I read:

    25 But there were standing by the cross of Jesus his mother, and his mother’s sister, Mary the wife of Clopas, and Mary Magdalene. 26 Therefore when Jesus saw his mother, and the disciple whom he loved standing there, he said to his mother, “Woman, behold your son!” 27 Then he said to the disciple, “Behold, your mother!” From that hour, the disciple took her to his own home.

    “Woman” can also mean “fiancee” in Greek.

    I decided that “the disciple whom he loved” is now me and (thinking that I should follow Gospel as a law) proclaimed to saint Mary (mother of Jesus): “I call you mother fiancee!”

    After this they happened some wonders about saint Mary. I see no necessity to describe details of the wonders. One particular wonder was that TV and radio whenever I heard them were speaking with “double meaning” (with second meaning saint Mary speaking to me).

    I dreamed about saint Mary to become my fiancee. She pointed me that I not just to dream but also to masturbate.

    In that time I was in hostile relations with the world, especially with Russia where I lived that time. I was going to make spirits to war against Russia possibly using nuclear weapons. So I concluded that I am a hostile man and should be stopped. But I need to make war to accomplish my mission which God has called me to, thought I. Therefore I need both to make war and not to make war. This led me to dedicate much of my time to masturbating, because it is also a commandment of God to love the woman He has given to a man; following hippie-like philosophy “it’s better to engage in love rather than in a war”. Sexually aroused Mary did many more wonders, what as I thought might be as important as my mission.

    I thought that saint Mary is incarnate in Mary, a daughter of Russian president Putin. I expected that God will make us meet soon.

    Then I’ve read (Mat. 22) “1 Jesus answered and spoke again in parables to them, saying, 2 “The Kingdom of Heaven is like a certain king, who made a marriage feast for his son, 3 and sent out his servants to call those who were invited to the marriage feast, but they would not come. 4 Again he sent out other servants, saying, ‘Tell those who are invited, “Behold, I have prepared my dinner. My cattle and my fatlings are killed, and all things are ready. Come to the marriage feast!”’ 5 But they made light of it, and went their ways, one to his own farm, another to his merchandise, 6 and the rest grabbed his servants, and treated them shamefully, and killed them. 7 When the king heard that, he was angry, and sent his armies, destroyed those murderers, and burned their city.”

    I decided: Because I am in marriage relations with saint Mary and nobody is to congratulate our wedding, the city Perm where I live should be destroyed with nuclear weapon. This is the punishment for ignoring me. Who ignore me are murderers because ignoring me they are pushing me to death of hunger. I am for them, as if I would not exist.

    I also concluded from nearby Bible verses that the nuclear war will be before the end of the autumn. I was going through the city and proclaiming my “prophecy” that the city Perl will be destroyed by an army. You know this hasn’t happened.

    Now you see how Gospel was perverted by me. We cannot follow sole Gospel anymore, we need to make our own free choices about what of exracted from the Gospel is right and what should be rejected. Don’t follow every example in Bible. For example, you should not follow after the biblical example of Cain. “Woe to them! For they went in the way of Cain, and ran riotously in the error of Balaam for hire, and perished in Korah’s rebellion.” (Jud. 1:11) It signifies the end of Gospel age and starting a new age, see my book.